You're a complete moron if you bet on the giants in any game. They are complete garbage
And you are who's agent? Oh sorry you must have a crystal ball.Those Bears don't look much better when Marshall is sidelined and Forte is getting stood up at the line.There you go Ditka
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bear_Down74:
You're a complete moron if you bet on the giants in any game. They are complete garbage
And you are who's agent? Oh sorry you must have a crystal ball.Those Bears don't look much better when Marshall is sidelined and Forte is getting stood up at the line.There you go Ditka
Yes, but you have to play the teams on your schedule, and who line up against you. It's not the Cowboys fault those teams aren't exactly the cream of the crop.
Actually it is, the schedule is made up from there record from last season.S.O.S strength of schedule from previous season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ed-Collins:
Yes, but you have to play the teams on your schedule, and who line up against you. It's not the Cowboys fault those teams aren't exactly the cream of the crop.
Actually it is, the schedule is made up from there record from last season.S.O.S strength of schedule from previous season.
Trends favor the Giants, but Dallas is a more complete team. Giants will be up for this one but I think they are outmatched on both sides of the ball. Where's the advantage? I think the Cowboys offensive line is the difference this year. Don't think the Boys will letdown because this is a divisional game.
0
Trends favor the Giants, but Dallas is a more complete team. Giants will be up for this one but I think they are outmatched on both sides of the ball. Where's the advantage? I think the Cowboys offensive line is the difference this year. Don't think the Boys will letdown because this is a divisional game.
Actually it is, the schedule is made up from there record from last season.S.O.S strength of schedule from previous season.
Yes, but you're missing the point.
I often read things like, "Yea, that team has a good record but they haven't beaten a strong team yet" or "Yea, they are winning but look who they played."
The inference is that the team is not as good as their record. And when EasyFBaby posted the (poor) records of the Cowboys opponents, he was doing just exactly that.
But not beating weak teams doesn't indicate a team isn't good... it means you don't know how good they are! They MIGHT be very, very good! He was implying they were not, and that's incorrect.
If Team X and Y and Z are known to be terrible, and Team A beats all three of them, is Team A a strong team? If you say no because "they haven't beaten anyone good yet" you had better be careful. Actually, you don't know how good Team A is. Team A could turn out to be great!
Those who underestimate a team based upon the record of the teams they've beaten do so at their own peril.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rubiconpilot05:
Actually it is, the schedule is made up from there record from last season.S.O.S strength of schedule from previous season.
Yes, but you're missing the point.
I often read things like, "Yea, that team has a good record but they haven't beaten a strong team yet" or "Yea, they are winning but look who they played."
The inference is that the team is not as good as their record. And when EasyFBaby posted the (poor) records of the Cowboys opponents, he was doing just exactly that.
But not beating weak teams doesn't indicate a team isn't good... it means you don't know how good they are! They MIGHT be very, very good! He was implying they were not, and that's incorrect.
If Team X and Y and Z are known to be terrible, and Team A beats all three of them, is Team A a strong team? If you say no because "they haven't beaten anyone good yet" you had better be careful. Actually, you don't know how good Team A is. Team A could turn out to be great!
Those who underestimate a team based upon the record of the teams they've beaten do so at their own peril.
I get the reverse angle- So this where vegas sets up the public because the Giants got pounded by the Eagles and the Cowboys went into Seattle and beat the best team in the league in the most hostile stadium last week.
NOT TO MENTION THROW IN VICTOR CRUZ IS OUT THE GIANTS #1 OFFENSIVE WEAPON.
So.... having said that, everyone sees an easy Dallas win here $ will flow in on Dallas
everyone gets duped into taking them and SURPRISE! shocker Giants win everyone gets fooled!
0
ok let me take a wild guess here..
I get the reverse angle- So this where vegas sets up the public because the Giants got pounded by the Eagles and the Cowboys went into Seattle and beat the best team in the league in the most hostile stadium last week.
NOT TO MENTION THROW IN VICTOR CRUZ IS OUT THE GIANTS #1 OFFENSIVE WEAPON.
So.... having said that, everyone sees an easy Dallas win here $ will flow in on Dallas
everyone gets duped into taking them and SURPRISE! shocker Giants win everyone gets fooled!
how retarded are you people? You people are the reason vegas makes money. HILARIOUS!!!! THE GIANTS FING SUCK. THEY ARE HORRIBLE AND DALLAS WILL GIVE THEM A SPANKING...its good for me keep betting the horrible teams and over thinking these games you idiots
0
how retarded are you people? You people are the reason vegas makes money. HILARIOUS!!!! THE GIANTS FING SUCK. THEY ARE HORRIBLE AND DALLAS WILL GIVE THEM A SPANKING...its good for me keep betting the horrible teams and over thinking these games you idiots
And you are who's agent? Oh sorry you must have a crystal ball.Those Bears don't look much better when Marshall is sidelined and Forte is getting stood up at the line.There you go Ditka
You make no sense moron
0
Quote Originally Posted by rubiconpilot05:
And you are who's agent? Oh sorry you must have a crystal ball.Those Bears don't look much better when Marshall is sidelined and Forte is getting stood up at the line.There you go Ditka
Michael Irving says they're the best team in the NFL 
ManLine +240. 
Hot Forum Topics
