Don't waste your time yyep. This guy doesn't exactly have a "great football mind."
LOL,,so if I don't agree than I don't have a great football mind? No need to measure each others dick here but......
FYI...you should be worry cause Vikes are 0-2 L2 ATS..looks like they are on a tail slide vs. covering ATS earlier this season. In the sportsbetting world, we used the terms "chasing" so good luck to your Vikes.
Don't waste your time yyep. This guy doesn't exactly have a "great football mind."
Don't waste your time yyep. This guy doesn't exactly have a "great football mind."
The one thing i see is Jared Allen making a huge contribution to this game, I think Vikes have about 5 or 6 sacks. On the flip side, that "damn" Rodgers has been sacked 25 times this season and they are still winning games. I think Rodgers get the calls and Packers winthis one.
Packers 34
Vikes 27
choioi, so lemme get this straight... You are betting the Packers ML because Minnesota lost (even though they outplayed) to the Steelers, the Packers have blown out two straight in Lambeau, and a revenge factor? Is that your rationale? If so, BOL with your bet...
Like I have said before, the Vikings are a better, more complete football team than the Packers ON ALL ASPECTS with the exception at CB since Winfield is hurt.
jesron - Is your lady bathing in a sink??? WTF>
choioi, so lemme get this straight... You are betting the Packers ML because Minnesota lost (even though they outplayed) to the Steelers, the Packers have blown out two straight in Lambeau, and a revenge factor? Is that your rationale? If so, BOL with your bet...
Like I have said before, the Vikings are a better, more complete football team than the Packers ON ALL ASPECTS with the exception at CB since Winfield is hurt.
jesron - Is your lady bathing in a sink??? WTF>
Dude you can say that the patriots were better that the fukn Giants on all aspects, "and what happened"?
We shall see, I do pretty damn well with my logic. These are grown men, they are going to go head to head with nofear against each other. GB will prevail.
Go ahead and look at "old" data bud, my logic are future predictions that have not been written in codes yet.
BOL
LOL, with all due respect, your a Vikes fan...so go ahead and bet this game with your heart. 7out of 10 times, you will contribute to my winning funds as money will be exchange from your pocket to the books back to my account.
It's hilarious how some of you guys are coming into this thread and the ones that disagree are mostly Vikes fans. I love it.....keep them coming cause you guys are all drinking that Bret Farve Kool Aid.
LOL, with all due respect, your a Vikes fan...so go ahead and bet this game with your heart. 7out of 10 times, you will contribute to my winning funds as money will be exchange from your pocket to the books back to my account.
It's hilarious how some of you guys are coming into this thread and the ones that disagree are mostly Vikes fans. I love it.....keep them coming cause you guys are all drinking that Bret Farve Kool Aid.
First off, welcome to covers.com...
We gave the game to the Steelers on a silver platter and they took advantage, plain and simple. TOs are part of the game, I am not arguing that. And yes, I will blame the pick on CT because it was a nicely throw ball that went off his fingertips. The Vikings run that play a lot and 9/10 times that gets them 7 plus yards. The Vikings drove down the Steelers throat most of the second half and they shut down the Steelers "potent" offense. Favre played pretty well IMHO. He made some great decisions where in the past he would have thrown more bonehead throws. You can also say the the Steelers couldn't do jack and that the Wallace tuddie was a fluke since we completely dominated your offense the ENTIRE game. There are a ton of wouldas and couldas, point is we lost and I am impressed with Favre's play.
I'm impressed with a defense that can take 2 turnovers some 60 or 70 yards for touchdowns.
Reminds me of last years Super Bowl, Warner/Farve a couple of washed up QB'S that shit the bed when the games on the LINE.
I like GB and the young man Aaron Rodgers.
Cause I am really liking the Packers ML at home here. Could be the biggest bet of the week for me. I've seen good teams lose back/back games all the time....look at GMEN, they were a perfect 5-0 til Saints, Zona mopped them up.
I know BF is playing in his old backyard but I can see GB beating them by a TD at home. This will be a grudge match IMHO. GB have gotten better by the week even though they are playing cupcakes but they have shut down their opponennts. I've chalk GB against Detroit/Cleveland and cashed nicely so I am looking to continue the bandwagon here.
Should I get off their bandwagon???
Any thoughts???
NOTHIN IS CERTAIN EVEN SUCH A GOOD TEAM LIKE VIKINGS CAN LOSE BACK 2 BACK GAMES..DEPENDING ON THEIR SCHEDULE..AS A MATTER A FACT TEAMS AFTER GOIN ON A BIG STREAK SOMEHOW FIND A WAY 2 GO DOWNHILL (JUST LOOK AT TITANS) THATS THE MOST COMMON WAY IN SPORTS..LIKE IN GAMBLING..ITS ALL BOUT LUCK..MOSTLY..AND INCHES..LIKE BIG AL SAID..WHEN THERE IS NOT MUCH SEPERATIN TEAMS..AND THIS IS HUGE REVENGE GAME, BUT WHO CAN BET AGINST BRETT!?
I'm impressed with a defense that can take 2 turnovers some 60 or 70 yards for touchdowns.
Reminds me of last years Super Bowl, Warner/Farve a couple of washed up QB'S that shit the bed when the games on the LINE.
I like GB and the young man Aaron Rodgers.
You're right man. Favre has no fourth quarter comebacks this year and Warner is just plain crap. Easily said, you are a fuckin' moron and are awarded no points. Thanks for playing dipshit 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
