All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

***AFC & NFC Championship Games***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 16647
Posts: 113
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 20937
Posted: #26
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 106
Posted: #27
i like GB in this one, but i really like the Over.
 
it keeps going down too. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 13368
Posted: #28
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by NYstarks03:

I agree.  It was exactly the same with the GB game last week with Rush taking the under and GB.  I like to roll where I have a chance to win both bets, not somewhat hedge one bet with the other.  In my estimation, if you are laying more than 10, you can't realistically take the under unless its Baltimore or Miami, which SD is certainly not. 

What happened the week before when I took San Diego and the under....I do not see this game going San Diego and over and if I do split I have no problem w/ it just like last week w/ Green Bay and the under...sports gambling is a long term acquisition and there is nothing wrong w/ hedging or giving yourself a better chance of not losing especially when there is limited games to choose from during the playoffs.  If both sides do cover(which I obviously feel like there is a pretty good chance of that happening) then it is a little added bonus..in this particular case I feel very strongly that I will not lose both plays...gl this weekend

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2798
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by rush:

I do not see San Diego's offense scoring more than 14 points...the only thing that could get me would be a special teams or defensive TD, but I am willing to risk that not happening....it is going to be very tough for this offense in Foxborough under very cold conditions w/ their 3 best offensive players banged up...it looks like Rivers and Gates may not even play and if they do they will be very limited and LT isn't 100%.







Well if San Diego scores 14 points, the Pats must score between 28-33 points  and usually its either going to be 28 or 31.

Would you lean more towards New England -13.5 or the Under 47.5 if you were only to have 1 play  on this game?  Love the Giants pick.  I actually see them winning straight up.



Rush.


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by dynamite140:



Well if San Diego scores 14 points, the Pats must score between 28-33 points  and usually its either going to be 28 or 31.

Would you lean more towards New England -13.5 or the Under 47.5 if you were only to have 1 play  on this game?  Love the Giants pick.  I actually see them winning straight up.



Rush.


 

New England -13.5

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #32
My thoughts exactly, Rush! On both.. Will also be on Giants ML+270 once again!!  Rivers hasn't practiced the last couple of days.. He's banged up real bad.. and Tomlinson(refuse to call him LT...there is only 1  LT out there!! tired of that) is banged up..we'll see how effective he'll be...Pats shut him down earlier in the yr.. For the Giants, RUN, RUN, RUN!! Hopefully, it'll set up the pass for Eli   It'll be a war out there.. That D must apply pressure.. only 15 sacks on the yr on Favre so I don't expect the Giants to sack him much, but hurrying to throw the ball will be key...We saw that in the 4th Qtr with Romo. I am AMPED!!! Lets win that

GMEN
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by rush:

What happened the week before when I took San Diego and the under....I do not see this game going San Diego and over and if I do split I have no problem w/ it just like last week w/ Green Bay and the under...sports gambling is a long term acquisition and there is nothing wrong w/ hedging or giving yourself a better chance of not losing especially when there is limited games to choose from during the playoffs.  If both sides do cover(which I obviously feel like there is a pretty good chance of that happening) then it is a little added bonus..in this particular case I feel very strongly that I will not lose both plays...gl this weekend

Should read: investment

Should read: both side and total

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 13368
Posted: #34
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #35
LOVEEEE the Pats this wk... I see that being the snoozer and the Giants game will be a dogfight.. With Kampman accusing  Sean O'Hara of dirty play..and other packers players saying the same... it's going to get chippy out there.... CANT WAIT..

GMEN
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2798
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by rush:

 

New England -13.5

 

 



had a feeling you were going to say that.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #37
Rush, have you started drinking already...? looks it! hah.. I've already started partying since last night
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #38
actually.. i've been partying since 00:00 of the Giants/Cowboys gm
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 1264
Posted: #39
Remember the name....Ahmad Bradshaw...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2061
Posted: #40
Hell Yeah!!!!!!!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 543
Posted: #41
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 2497
Posted: #42
Finally you are taking the Giants - GO GMEN!!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 517
Posted: #43
same as the touts...all have NE and NYG dont know if thats good or bad bro.....GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1723
Posted: #44
 
gl bro
 
love the picks 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 8290
Posted: #45
    GL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 1284
Posted: #46
wooohooo  GMEN!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2300
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by chillery:

    GL

???, you are a Giants and Pats hater all over this board and now you support Giants pats action by RUSH  after bashing both teams on every conceivable Giants and Pats thread on this board??  I must say you are the typical Cowgirls fan and either just a kiss ass here or a flip flop.  I'd venture to say both. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #48
Greenbay
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2262
Posted: #49
Love the New England play but, on the other side with the Packers. GL with your plays.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 389
Posted: #50
100% with the rush
 
 
Good luck
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.