All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

***AFC & NFC Championship Games***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 16647
Posts: 113
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #1
3-4 last week...8-6 so far in the playoffs...this is what I have so far for Sunday:
 
 
 
 
New England -13.5 (-110)
 
N.Y. Giants +7.5 (-110)
 
 
 
 
good luck
 
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42643
Posted: #2
I'm with you on New England. Good luck, Rush!  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 13492
Posted: #3
GL.... my book just came off the 14 and went to 13.5... Jints still at 7 but +100.
 
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 13464
Posted: #4
Love the Giants this week....best of luck rush
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 589
Posted: #5
with ya on both rush everybody is on GB just dont get it.
BOL
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 16954
Posted: #6
With you on one, against you on one, BOL!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 2000
Posted: #7

Thats how I would do it.  GL 

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1330
Posted: #8
those are very gutsy picks now im all confused, i think your the best a capping NCAAF not so much with the NFL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1005
Posted: #9
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 14055
Posted: #10
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 1191
Posted: #11
GL this weekend rush -- I have made some good $ following your picks this year - especially last nights NCAAB Tennessee game! Love the Giants covering but im gonna roll with my Chargers - All the best  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 263
Posted: #12
Rush-Any thoughts on the totals?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 13368
Posted: #13
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by jinkazama0619:

those are very gutsy picks now im all confused, i think your the best a capping NCAAF not so much with the NFL

I can just about guarantee you my record this year in the NFL is better than my NCAAF record.

 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by HateChalk:

Rush-Any thoughts on the totals?

Lean to both unders...may have a play or two later on the totals.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 1194
Posted: #16
Perfect! 
 
And just like the great capper you are you got the best numbers (-13.5, +7.5!)
 
And I'm guessing it's just a matter of time until you post UNDER on both games as well!
 
Not like it matters but I love both your plays and will also be on both unders too!
 
BOL on a profitable weekend RUSH, and everyone else!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 1194
Posted: #17
I didn't see that last post when I put mine up, it was just 19 sec. earlier. NOW I look like an idiot! Shit!
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #18

adding:

 

 

San Diego/New England "under" 47.5 (-115)

 

 

good luck

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2485
Posted: #19
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 1315
Posted: #20
BOL on the unders, and on 1 of your sides.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 2798
Posted: #21
Rush you only see San Diego scoring a max of 14 points right?  Only way we can we both bets is if San Diego scoring 14 and New England scoring 28-34.  The max the chargers can score is 16 but New England would need to score EXACTLY 30 OR 31.  I know your probably considered this already. 

Do you see New England winning something like 31-13 or 34-13?  This is similar to you 2 weeks ago taking San Diego -10 and taking the under 43 i think and i really think we are being restricted since we cannot have the Pats score too much and San Diego scoring more than 14.


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 57
Posted: #22
I agree.  It was exactly the same with the GB game last week with Rush taking the under and GB.  I like to roll where I have a chance to win both bets, not somewhat hedge one bet with the other.  In my estimation, if you are laying more than 10, you can't realistically take the under unless its Baltimore or Miami, which SD is certainly not. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by dynamite140:

Rush you only see San Diego scoring a max of 14 points right?  Only way we can we both bets is if San Diego scoring 14 and New England scoring 28-34.  The max the chargers can score is 16 but New England would need to score EXACTLY 30 OR 31.  I know your probably considered this already. 

Do you see New England winning something like 31-13 or 34-13?  This is similar to you 2 weeks ago taking San Diego -10 and taking the under 43 i think and i really think we are being restricted since we cannot have the Pats score too much and San Diego scoring more than 14.


I do not see San Diego's offense scoring more than 14 points...the only thing that could get me would be a special teams or defensive TD, but I am willing to risk that not happening....it is going to be very tough for this offense in Foxborough under very cold conditions w/ their 3 best offensive players banged up...it looks like Rivers and Gates may not even play and if they do they will be very limited and LT isn't 100%.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2300
Posted: #24
beautiful! i felt all by myself on these 2, loving that extra 1/2 point for Gmen 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 522
Posted: #25
I was on these games before I saw you post. Now, I know I am good.  Best of luck to you.
 
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.