All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

21-2 ATS trend in play for Sunday 10/16

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 42687
Posts: 270
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 2260
Posted: #126
Quote Originally Posted by Yavapai:

this is the UGLY PIG angle from marc lawrence's black book.

the actual angle is play on any 0-4 team the remainder of the season if they are a dog coming in off a su loss.

rams, dolphins, vikings and colts are in this role.

The colts are a play this week also along with the rams and the dolphins.

Yavapanocha,  Have you checked those high lighted how they did?  Last year those 0- 4 teams ( Carolina , Buffalo) went 4-3-1 and 3-7 ATS remainder of season if they are dog coming in off a su loss. But both covered coming out of bye week which this thread is all about.  So with this fact , yes you are too gullible/lazy to think information on internet is all based on fact without checking it yourself.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 18306
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by elow4sho305:

-------------ur going to lose that------------5,000 on PACKERS-15 -16 -17 --------there at home ----enough said---2 touchdowns each quarter---


-5,000 on PACKERS



-5,500 on PACKERS
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #128
nice work!
tough to take those points with such a crumby offense.

maybe STL pulls something together here, GB can look past it and not come out 100% if your lucky!!

GL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #129
Rams down to +14 at bookmaker................
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #130
Knew the line would move this way, just thought it would come later
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3164
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Listen kid, I've been around a lot longer than you and I have forgotten more about betting on football than you currently know. Bet what you want I really don't give  a snot. I'm just here trying to help people.

Every year I post strong trends that hit and every year know it alls like you fail to come back after the game is over.

Here is just one more example:

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100923314&page=1

What have you brought to this site? Get lost


BigNiner,
Keep putting out the info.  What people do with it is their business.  It's not being a douche to place an opinion against it.  But it is a douche who just won't shut the f--- up about it.  Enough already guys and girls.  Trash his input, fade his suggestion, and get the f--- out
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 78
Posted: #132
to me those stats mean nothing because what does that mean going into this particular game, what does that stat have to do with how the packers are doing this year and how the rams are this year, absolutely nothing! i just don't get that logic
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 1072
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by bakergreg41:

to me those stats mean nothing because what does that mean going into this particular game, what does that stat have to do with how the packers are doing this year and how the rams are this year, absolutely nothing! i just don't get that logic


AGREED!!  A trend that has been manufactured over the last 20 years by teams and players that have absolutely NOTHING to do with this game!!  This is what bad cappers reach for IMO.  Have fun cheering for the Rams this weekend.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 610
Posted: #134
BigNiner; What makes this tread even more interesting is not just the 21-2 record but the fact that every one hates it. My local has it +15 1/2 and i'm a packer loyalist but i'll bite on it for the above reasons.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 12
Posted: #135
Guys. -_- Rams contributed to Eagles' only win.

They lost to the Eagles DD... 18 to be exact..

what makes you think they won't lose to GB at 14?! I just don't understand this logic.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #136

Quote Originally Posted by bakergreg41:

to me those stats mean nothing because what does that mean going into this particular game, what does that stat have to do with how the packers are doing this year and how the rams are this year, absolutely nothing! i just don't get that logic

That's the problem with people like you. You just don't get it.

Say what you will, but trends do matter. The sooner you realize that, the bigger advantage you'll have in picking winners.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 13343
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by Hummus:

Guys. -_- Rams contributed to Eagles' only win.

They lost to the Eagles DD... 18 to be exact..

what makes you think they won't lose to GB at 14?! I just don't understand this logic.


How many people thought the Seahawks would win outright last week? It happens when you dont expect it..........now in no way am I saying the Rams will win outright because I dont see it happening but they may get a back door cover...........
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1562
Posted: #138
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

That's the problem with people like you. You just don't get it.

Say what you will, but trends do matter. The sooner you realize that, the bigger advantage you'll have in picking winners.



I hope this play hits.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by drivetime:



AGREED!!  A trend that has been manufactured over the last 20 years by teams and players that have absolutely NOTHING to do with this game!!  This is what bad cappers reach for IMO.  Have fun cheering for the Rams this weekend.

Now I'm a bad capper, says the guy who has been here for a few months.

See my post above. If you think trends mean nothing, you know nothing. Once upon a time and many years ago I thought like you and after I repeatedly ignoring trends, I opened my eyes....and haven't looked back.

I am going to have a GREAT TIME cheering for the Rams on Sunday!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #140

Quote Originally Posted by Hummus:

Guys. -_- Rams contributed to Eagles' only win.

They lost to the Eagles DD... 18 to be exact..

what makes you think they won't lose to GB at 14?! I just don't understand this logic.

Because in the NFL --EVERYONE contributes to everyone's losses fool.

This is why you can't say team A beat team B who beat team C....so team A should have no problem beating team C.

Wouldn't that make handicapping games simple? Or is that the way you already pick them?

That wouldn't surprise me either, given your circular logic.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 166
Posted: #141
Tbh I don't understand why BigNiner and PrimeTimeBoys try to persuade other people when the argument they get in contrary is "OMG LOL Green Bay is Green Bay!!! They are good!!! And Rams are what, Rams? They bad!11". Well, when it comes to bets, BigNiner and PrimeTimeBoys are Green Bay (knowledge, experience, mental power) and that simplicity of playstyle (always bet the better team!!1) is more of Rams. That still doesn't mean Green Bay always wins, but you get the idea.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1506
Posted: #142
no way in fuck packers lose this lol

GL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 6903
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by JeromeBender:

no way in fuck packers lose this lol

GL

The question isn't will the Rams win. It's will the Rams cover the spread.

GL

Rams look good this weekend

Any thoughts on the Browns? Big injuries up front on their offensive line but can they make do?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1538
Posted: #144
Simple question BigNiner, do you think the Rams can outright win? And my question is in no way disrespectful, i am a trend capper myselfl, i'm just curious because i have the Packers in a big 10 point teaser and after reading about this trend it kinda made me doubt.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 253
Posted: #145
sorry, St. Louis will be lucky to score a touchdown in this game.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #146

Quote Originally Posted by paradox:

Simple question BigNiner, do you think the Rams can outright win? And my question is in no way disrespectful, i am a trend capper myselfl, i'm just curious because i have the Packers in a big 10 point teaser and after reading about this trend it kinda made me doubt.

Paradox - It is a fair question. With this trend, nearly half of the ATS wins have also been SU wins. For example, last year Buffalo the 14 point dog, was a fumble in OT away from winning outright. 2 years ago Tampa beat Green Bay by 10 as 9.5 dogs.

Put it this way - I am not expecting St. Louis to win the game; but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if it did happen. I am playing this game from the spread angle, but one cannot discount that nearly half of the big dogs win SU or that the only 2 losses in this trend were by a total of 1 point each.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #147

Quote Originally Posted by bpbeelen:

sorry, St. Louis will be lucky to score a touchdown in this game.

bpbeelen - I just want to say how much of a supporter I am of yours. I look forward to your post every three months

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1538
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:

Paradox - It is a fair question. With this trend, nearly half of the ATS wins have also been SU wins. For example, last year Buffalo the 14 point dog, was a fumble in OT away from winning outright. 2 years ago Tampa beat Green Bay by 10 as 9.5 dogs.

Put it this way - I am not expecting St. Louis to win the game; but I certainly wouldn't be surprised if it did happen. I am playing this game from the spread angle, but one cannot discount that nearly half of the big dogs win SU or that the only 2 losses in this trend were by a total of 1 point each.



Fuck, NOW i'm scared
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 15689
Posted: #149

With the Pack at 14 here, but good luck on your play....

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 8229
Posted: #150
Quote Originally Posted by jay10:

With the Pack at 14 here, but good luck on your play....

You too bud

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.