• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets

    «First Previous 697071 ... 354355356 Next Last»
    fubah2
    Macwestie1
    Zeus4par
    KellyM_1964
    vanzack
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 302183
    Posts: 8878
    «First Previous 697071 ... 354355356 Next Last»
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 9, 2023 - 7:26 PM ET #1701

    Quote Originally Posted by mandy1:

    Great job Fubah an_praise

    THANK YOU, Mandy!

    BoL with your bets! clover

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by mandy1:

    Great job Fubah an_praise

    THANK YOU, Mandy!

    BoL with your bets! clover

     
    Macwestie1
    Macwestie1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 171148
    Posted: Oct. 9, 2023 - 7:31 PM ET #1702

    BOL clovertonight @fubah2peace_5

     

    What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion player with a beeper!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    BOL clovertonight @fubah2peace_5

     

     
    Zeus4par
    Zeus4par
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2021
    Posts: 6070
    Posted: Oct. 9, 2023 - 8:44 PM ET #1703

    @Macwestie1

     GL Macwestie1  an_cheers

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @Macwestie1

     GL Macwestie1  an_cheers

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 2:35 AM ET #1704

    Fubah's  high risk NFL bets, WEEK 6:

     

    an_lightThis is the spot (last yr) where I began posting my epic 100 - 39 run!
    So, do I feel a repeat coming?!?!       Naahhhhh...   unlikely....
                     I NEVER suggest anyone tail my bets. Proceed at your own risk.

    CHIEFS -3.5 -300 alt
    Ravens -175
    FALCONS -135
    SF Niners -220
    TEXANS +3 -150 alt
    JAGUARS -200
    DOLPHINS -6.5-300 alt
    TAMPA +7.5-240 alt
    LA RAMS -264
    BUFFY -6.5 -334 alt
    NY JETS +8 -163 alt

     

    *May upgrade a bet or two to *BB status later...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Fubah's  high risk NFL bets, WEEK 6:

     

    an_lightThis is the spot (last yr) where I began posting my epic 100 - 39 run!
    So, do I feel a repeat coming?!?!       Naahhhhh...   unlikely....
                     I NEVER suggest anyone tail my bets. Proceed at your own risk.

    CHIEFS -3.5 -300 alt
    Ravens -175
    FALCONS -135
    SF Niners -220
    TEXANS +3 -150 alt
    JAGUARS -200
    DOLPHINS -6.5-300 alt
    TAMPA +7.5-240 alt
    LA RAMS -264
    BUFFY -6.5 -334 alt
    NY JETS +8 -163 alt

     

    *May upgrade a bet or two to *BB status later...

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 4:37 PM ET #1705

    @fubah2

     an_cheers

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    @fubah2

     an_cheers

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 5:05 PM ET #1706

    What an epic thread.

    Have a great season Fubah.

    peace_5

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    What an epic thread.

    Have a great season Fubah.

    peace_5

     
    Zeus4par
    Zeus4par
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2021
    Posts: 6070
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 6:10 PM ET #1707

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    FINAL STATS for buying pts down on a heavy fav of -7.5 and higher:

     

    I am 40 - 3 when the juice I am staking is -270 and higher.

    But specifically for moneyline bets of -270 and higher I am  19 - 1

     

    Here are my results when I bought pts to improve a "select" *HOME* FAV's of -7.5 and up chances of covering at a significantly lower number:

    bought pts down to -6.5 .... 0 - 1 -332 (Eagles fail cover by 1 pt)
    bought pts down to -6.0 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.5 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.0 .... 2 - 0 - 1
    bought pts down to -2.5 .. 10 - 0    (mean avg stake is -322)
    bought pts down to -1.5 .... 3 - 0

    = 17 - 1   when buying pts,  despite heavy chalk! an_light

     

    *See notes in above post #836

    @fubah2  

    I will be curious to see how well your point buys works in 2023

    I seriously doubt it will be repeated anywhere close

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    FINAL STATS for buying pts down on a heavy fav of -7.5 and higher:

     

    I am 40 - 3 when the juice I am staking is -270 and higher.

    But specifically for moneyline bets of -270 and higher I am  19 - 1

     

    Here are my results when I bought pts to improve a "select" *HOME* FAV's of -7.5 and up chances of covering at a significantly lower number:

    bought pts down to -6.5 .... 0 - 1 -332 (Eagles fail cover by 1 pt)
    bought pts down to -6.0 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.5 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.0 .... 2 - 0 - 1
    bought pts down to -2.5 .. 10 - 0    (mean avg stake is -322)
    bought pts down to -1.5 .... 3 - 0

    = 17 - 1   when buying pts,  despite heavy chalk! an_light

     

    *See notes in above post #836

    @fubah2  

    I will be curious to see how well your point buys works in 2023

    I seriously doubt it will be repeated anywhere close

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 10:34 PM ET #1708

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

    FINAL STATS for buying pts down on a heavy fav of -7.5 and higher:

     

    I am 40 - 3 when the juice I am staking is -270 and higher.

    But specifically for moneyline bets of -270 and higher I am  19 - 1

     

    Here are my results when I bought pts to improve a "select" *HOME* FAV's of -7.5 and up chances of covering at a significantly lower number:

    bought pts down to -6.5 .... 0 - 1 -332 (Eagles fail cover by 1 pt)
    bought pts down to -6.0 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.5 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.0 .... 2 - 0 - 1
    bought pts down to -2.5 .. 10 - 0    (mean avg stake is -322)
    bought pts down to -1.5 .... 3 - 0

    = 17 - 1    when buying pts,  despite heavy chalk! an_light

     

    *See notes in above post #836

     

     

    @fubah2   I will be curious to see how well your point buys works in 2023  I seriously doubt it will be repeated anywhere close

    @Zeus4par

    OK, so??  Maybe it won't, but I will try to think positively, and work toward at least reasonable profits in both CFB and NFL again this season.

    BoL with your bets this week clover

    Reply
    Quote Post
    1
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

    FINAL STATS for buying pts down on a heavy fav of -7.5 and higher:

     

    I am 40 - 3 when the juice I am staking is -270 and higher.

    But specifically for moneyline bets of -270 and higher I am  19 - 1

     

    Here are my results when I bought pts to improve a "select" *HOME* FAV's of -7.5 and up chances of covering at a significantly lower number:

    bought pts down to -6.5 .... 0 - 1 -332 (Eagles fail cover by 1 pt)
    bought pts down to -6.0 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.5 .... 1 - 0
    bought pts down to -3.0 .... 2 - 0 - 1
    bought pts down to -2.5 .. 10 - 0    (mean avg stake is -322)
    bought pts down to -1.5 .... 3 - 0

    = 17 - 1    when buying pts,  despite heavy chalk! an_light

     

    *See notes in above post #836

     

     

    @fubah2   I will be curious to see how well your point buys works in 2023  I seriously doubt it will be repeated anywhere close

    @Zeus4par

    OK, so??  Maybe it won't, but I will try to think positively, and work toward at least reasonable profits in both CFB and NFL again this season.

    BoL with your bets this week clover

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 11:11 PM ET #1709

    Tough call coming up next MNF

    K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week.

    Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Tough call coming up next MNF

    K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week.

    Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 10, 2023 - 11:47 PM ET #1710

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy

    Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy

    Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner!

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 1:06 AM ET #1711

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner!

    Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF  paint_help

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner!

    Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF  paint_help

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1712

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1713

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1714

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1715

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1716

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1717

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1718

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:24 AM ET #1719

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    MNF: My ratings have PACKERS ahead of daaaa Raaayduuhhs - WITH Watson at receiver but even without Aaron Jones at RB.  That's the case tonight. PACKERS got an embarrassing beatdown in LAMBEAU in front of their adoring hometown fans, to a very good division rival that has completely erased their "loser" past.  But how would YOU expect proud teams typically respond after a homefield embarrassment like that when going on the road to face a slightly weaker opponent? An opp that has the league leading WR who used to play for Green Bay. PACKERS OLine was patchwork but is healing fast. Sure, LOVE can scramble.....and he just may have to do a lot of that tonight.  That may be be a good thing though if he fully utilizes the "Patrick Mahommes" style within him..... OR, he could be sacked multiple times, ending crucial drives. Coin-flip on that questionmark.... In PACKERS only 2 road games thus far (week's 1 and 2) the PACKERS whacked the Bears then narrowly lost a one-pointer in Atlanta to a mediocre team rated higher than Raiders.  So, an 18 point victory and a single pt loss. They will be getting +2 tonight at LV... AND their last game was 11 days ago on TNF.  They've had more days to heal (esp the OLine) and prepare for MNF than Raiders. Meanwhile, daaaa Raaaayduuuhhs are a mystery to me.  Two weeks ago they were in prime spot AT HOME  to whack the VERY LUCKY Steelers (rated about dead even with GreenBay) but were being outplayed and losing 23 - 7 until "garbage time" midway through the final Q - when they still lost by 5.  HOME FIELD!   Tonight they are again on homefield facing an equally rated opp (Packers) to those "luckyass" Steelers, but with starters Hobbs and Bennett OUT of the Raiders secondary and backup LONG will be forced in with an ankle injury.   I favor taking the points .... but will not......not yet.....I need to see how things are sorting themselves out early in the contest and will look for LIVE BET opps....
    its a good thing u backed off  pack r now worse than LV  who is weak

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:54 AM ET #1720

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

      What an epic thread!

    Have a great season Fubah! peace_5

    Thanks! and BoL with all your bets this year! clover

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

      What an epic thread!

    Have a great season Fubah! peace_5

    Thanks! and BoL with all your bets this year! clover

     

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:55 AM ET #1721

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:55 AM ET #1722

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

     
    KellyM_1964
    KellyM_1964
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 16741
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:55 AM ET #1723

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

    "I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

    Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Tough call coming up next MNF K'Boys coming off a major beatdown.....the rested CHARGERS, AT HOME, coming off a bye week. Dallas on paper is the better team, but just lost their STAR linebacker...Chargers getting healthiy Dallas already without DIGGS at corner, have now also lost at GOODWIN at corner! Now RW is reporting that Dallas Safety Donovan Wilson sustained an injury that makes him Q for MNF
    cowboys secondary definitely in trouble against the pass happy chargers

     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:56 AM ET #1724

    Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

    BOLclover tonight @fubah2peace_5

    THANKS!  and BoL with your bets this week! thumbs_up

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

    BOLclover tonight @fubah2peace_5

    THANKS!  and BoL with your bets this week! thumbs_up

     
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53043
    Posted: Oct. 11, 2023 - 2:58 AM ET #1725

    Quote Originally Posted by mandy1:

    Great job Fubah

    Thank you sir!

    BoL with all your bets this week! an_cheers

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by mandy1:

    Great job Fubah

    Thank you sir!

    BoL with all your bets this week! an_cheers

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 697071 ... 354355356 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,944 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 751 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,929 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 97,817 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 2,566 Covers arrow
    • Dumb Political Statements 12,954 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 4,923 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 189 Covers arrow
    • The TRUTH if you can take it!! 21,046 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 20,783 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.