ur telling me that dunk was impressive...it was a joke...he pushed off his teamates back and got his ball sack all over his head...not even close to impressive
are you telling me Nate's first dunk in the finals was impressive??? NO! it sucked shit!
but the fact is, Nate won the dunk contest with his FIRST dunk, because the people voting never got to see Demar's first dunk....... so Demar got only 1 dunk vs. 2 for Nate.......
it doesn't matter if the dunk was better or not......... it was at least close, but because it wasn't shown, Derozan only got credit for 1 dunk.........
don't argue shit that there is no argument for!
0
Quote Originally Posted by jrdwade12345:
ur telling me that dunk was impressive...it was a joke...he pushed off his teamates back and got his ball sack all over his head...not even close to impressive
are you telling me Nate's first dunk in the finals was impressive??? NO! it sucked shit!
but the fact is, Nate won the dunk contest with his FIRST dunk, because the people voting never got to see Demar's first dunk....... so Demar got only 1 dunk vs. 2 for Nate.......
it doesn't matter if the dunk was better or not......... it was at least close, but because it wasn't shown, Derozan only got credit for 1 dunk.........
this is the bottom-line as i see it....... and this is very important point!
Nate Robinson was going for a record 3rd straight slam dunk title........ there is no way he should be given that 3rd title (making him a better dunker than Michael Jordan, Dominique Wilkins and Dr. J!!!)......... unless he just absolutely blew away the competition.......
the fact that they gave a record 3rd straight dunk title to a guy that won the most pathetic dunk contest ever, means they have forever invalidated not only this contest, but the entire history of the dunk contest........
Nate looked like complete SHIT! no way in hell he should have been given a 3rd straight title for that performance........ he should have lost by default......
0
this is the bottom-line as i see it....... and this is very important point!
Nate Robinson was going for a record 3rd straight slam dunk title........ there is no way he should be given that 3rd title (making him a better dunker than Michael Jordan, Dominique Wilkins and Dr. J!!!)......... unless he just absolutely blew away the competition.......
the fact that they gave a record 3rd straight dunk title to a guy that won the most pathetic dunk contest ever, means they have forever invalidated not only this contest, but the entire history of the dunk contest........
Nate looked like complete SHIT! no way in hell he should have been given a 3rd straight title for that performance........ he should have lost by default......
The truth is all the dunks sucked except the last one for Nate and the one with the side of the board for Derozan. the two 50s. nothing else was impressive.
I think I've been spoiled by dwight howard.
Spoiled by Howard?
0
Quote Originally Posted by IronPicks:
The truth is all the dunks sucked except the last one for Nate and the one with the side of the board for Derozan. the two 50s. nothing else was impressive.
Derozan was robbed. Midget Man Robinson can't even start for the pathetic Knicks. Barely played all season, and now he comes in and wins the Dunk Contest. Who really cares about this loser. Then he goes and thanks God for his talent? Really? Go thank God for all the pine stuck on your ass for sitting on the Bench. This years all-star weekend sucks!
0
Derozan was robbed. Midget Man Robinson can't even start for the pathetic Knicks. Barely played all season, and now he comes in and wins the Dunk Contest. Who really cares about this loser. Then he goes and thanks God for his talent? Really? Go thank God for all the pine stuck on your ass for sitting on the Bench. This years all-star weekend sucks!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.