What are you SMOKIN?
Must be crack! ![]()
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
Did the Celtics face the Lakers with Pau Gasol this season? ![]()
![]()
On the road in the playoffs: Lakers 4-3 (vs. better competition), Celtics 2-7 ![]()
Oh, and don't forget 8-0 at home! ![]()
Did the Celtics face the Lakers with Pau Gasol this season? ![]()
![]()
On the road in the playoffs: Lakers 4-3 (vs. better competition), Celtics 2-7 ![]()
Oh, and don't forget 8-0 at home! ![]()
Did the Celtics face the Lakers with Pau Gasol this season? ![]()
![]()
On the road in the playoffs: Lakers 4-3 (vs. better competition), Celtics 2-7 ![]()
Oh, and don't forget 8-0 at home! ![]()
Did the Celtics face the Lakers with Pau Gasol this season? ![]()
![]()
On the road in the playoffs: Lakers 4-3 (vs. better competition), Celtics 2-7 ![]()
Oh, and don't forget 8-0 at home! ![]()
Pau did not have a great series against the tough physical defense of the SAS. Playing agaist the Celtics and Perkins is not the same as playing against the pourous Denver defense or against the flat footed Okur. Pau spent half the games vs. SAS complaining to refs about pervieved non-calls. Physical defense really takes him out of his game.
On offense, If Kobe is on Allen and Radmonivich is on Pierce, that would be a dream come true for Pierce. Kobe will be running all over the court chasing Allen, which will be to the advantage of the Celtics. I'm not sure how those match-ups favor the Lakers. On defense, Pierce will surely be on Kobe.
Generally, the Celtics are quick enough on their rotations to neutralize an effective three-point attack. Like I said, Kobe will get his 20+ points, but that doesn't always lead to Lakers victories. The Celtics Defense has more than enough to shut down everyone else.
Walton is NOT solid. Are we watching the same games? Why do you think Kobe is yelling at him all the time? He gets lost on offense and defense regularly. Posey is tough on defense and offense. He will OWN Sasha.
When Sasha is in the game (which I think he will get some more minutes this series then Radmonivich at least thats what I would do if I was coaching the Lakers) he will more then likely be on ray allen and kobe will be on pierce. Kobe is quicker then PP so he should be able to stay in front of him. If Paul is hitting those fade away jump shots he is going to get his. Now on defense Kobe will go for 30+ every night, not 20+. Pau has a few inches on Perkins so I think hes going to be able to do much better then he did against the spurs who were real physical with him. I'll be really interested in seeing how the matchups do go. No way can Paul Pierce guard Kobe. I think you could see a couple of different matchups along the series, but in the end I don't see anyway that the Celtics can win this series.
Also a big key is what the linemakes have opened this series as. Now I know the lakers are big public team, but you can't act like the Celtics haven't gotten a lot of public love this year. I mean name wise they got 3 of the biggest names from the past 10 years on one team. The line opened up at -3.5 for the Celtics with the public hitting them a slightly higher clip then the lakers and the line has dropped at almost all sites. Now I do think the Celtics might win game one, but after that I think the lakers take the next 4 in a row. League might do some fishy things to get this series to go 7, but the series prices also say that the lakers win. They are favoring a team that doesn't have homecourt vs a team thats only lost one game on its home floor this postseason and had the best road record in the regular season. All these things just point to a Lakers win
Pau did not have a great series against the tough physical defense of the SAS. Playing agaist the Celtics and Perkins is not the same as playing against the pourous Denver defense or against the flat footed Okur. Pau spent half the games vs. SAS complaining to refs about pervieved non-calls. Physical defense really takes him out of his game.
On offense, If Kobe is on Allen and Radmonivich is on Pierce, that would be a dream come true for Pierce. Kobe will be running all over the court chasing Allen, which will be to the advantage of the Celtics. I'm not sure how those match-ups favor the Lakers. On defense, Pierce will surely be on Kobe.
Generally, the Celtics are quick enough on their rotations to neutralize an effective three-point attack. Like I said, Kobe will get his 20+ points, but that doesn't always lead to Lakers victories. The Celtics Defense has more than enough to shut down everyone else.
Walton is NOT solid. Are we watching the same games? Why do you think Kobe is yelling at him all the time? He gets lost on offense and defense regularly. Posey is tough on defense and offense. He will OWN Sasha.
When Sasha is in the game (which I think he will get some more minutes this series then Radmonivich at least thats what I would do if I was coaching the Lakers) he will more then likely be on ray allen and kobe will be on pierce. Kobe is quicker then PP so he should be able to stay in front of him. If Paul is hitting those fade away jump shots he is going to get his. Now on defense Kobe will go for 30+ every night, not 20+. Pau has a few inches on Perkins so I think hes going to be able to do much better then he did against the spurs who were real physical with him. I'll be really interested in seeing how the matchups do go. No way can Paul Pierce guard Kobe. I think you could see a couple of different matchups along the series, but in the end I don't see anyway that the Celtics can win this series.
Also a big key is what the linemakes have opened this series as. Now I know the lakers are big public team, but you can't act like the Celtics haven't gotten a lot of public love this year. I mean name wise they got 3 of the biggest names from the past 10 years on one team. The line opened up at -3.5 for the Celtics with the public hitting them a slightly higher clip then the lakers and the line has dropped at almost all sites. Now I do think the Celtics might win game one, but after that I think the lakers take the next 4 in a row. League might do some fishy things to get this series to go 7, but the series prices also say that the lakers win. They are favoring a team that doesn't have homecourt vs a team thats only lost one game on its home floor this postseason and had the best road record in the regular season. All these things just point to a Lakers win
Gasol won't matter??? Are you serious? Do you know the Lakers record with Gasol in the lineup?
I'll help you out with this.....
LAKERS w/Gasol: 34 WINS
7 LOSSES
(and one loss where Gasol only played 2 minutes because he left the game due to injury)
So are you sure Gasol doesn't matter??? ![]()
Gasol won't matter??? Are you serious? Do you know the Lakers record with Gasol in the lineup?
I'll help you out with this.....
LAKERS w/Gasol: 34 WINS
7 LOSSES
(and one loss where Gasol only played 2 minutes because he left the game due to injury)
So are you sure Gasol doesn't matter??? ![]()
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
You tell me. Then why are all your Laker buddies bringing it up all the time.
When you have to keep asking for "respect", that shows insecurity. Anyone saying anything about the Lakers was labeled "non-believer" or a "hater".
L8kersfan74, I "respect" your opinion as opposed to most other Laker fans because you are very objective in your analysis. You just don't say the Lakers are going to win and cover every single game.
The bottom line is both teams got to the finals.
I could say, even though the West is "loaded" the Lakers had an easy road. Denver is so weak, Utah horrible road team and as all Laker fans noted throughout the series time and time again, very overrated, and finally SA, old and tired.
Then you are going to come back and say how the Celtics struggled against Atl on the road (which they did) and Clev the whole series going 7.
Quite a few people felt the Celtics struggles against the lesser teams would be their downfall against the mighty "Stones". The Celtics had an easier time against Detroit.which was hard to figure.
Now that they both have reached the finals, do you really think anything that happened in the previous series' is really going to determine who wins the championship? All the previous stuff doesn't mean squat and I wouldn't hang your hat on it. Both teams made the finals because they are the 2 best teams. The Celtics never played against Gasol on the Lakers is hardly a reason to go by.
Every game is different and may the best team win.
Just trying to be objective and not look thru purple and gold colored glasses all the time.
I am a Celtics fan but I am not going to predict a sweep or that the C's are going to crush the Lakers. Do I have concerns? Sure I do.
I am not going to say the Lakers are going to win because the Celtics suck on the road. They were the best road team during the regular season. They sucked on the road in rounds 1 and 2. Just because they won 2 games on the road against Detroit doesn't mean their worries are over.
I hate the 2,3,2 finals format. I think it favors the Lakers.
Would I be shocked if the Lakers win the championship. No.
But I feel the Celtics will win the series in, why not, 7 games.
From an objective fan, the Lakers have my respect. May the best team bring home the trophy.
Best of Luck
That's understandable, BUT, I guess steamrolling through the loaded Western Conference wasn't enough to earn any respect? ![]()
You tell me. Then why are all your Laker buddies bringing it up all the time.
When you have to keep asking for "respect", that shows insecurity. Anyone saying anything about the Lakers was labeled "non-believer" or a "hater".
L8kersfan74, I "respect" your opinion as opposed to most other Laker fans because you are very objective in your analysis. You just don't say the Lakers are going to win and cover every single game.
The bottom line is both teams got to the finals.
I could say, even though the West is "loaded" the Lakers had an easy road. Denver is so weak, Utah horrible road team and as all Laker fans noted throughout the series time and time again, very overrated, and finally SA, old and tired.
Then you are going to come back and say how the Celtics struggled against Atl on the road (which they did) and Clev the whole series going 7.
Quite a few people felt the Celtics struggles against the lesser teams would be their downfall against the mighty "Stones". The Celtics had an easier time against Detroit.which was hard to figure.
Now that they both have reached the finals, do you really think anything that happened in the previous series' is really going to determine who wins the championship? All the previous stuff doesn't mean squat and I wouldn't hang your hat on it. Both teams made the finals because they are the 2 best teams. The Celtics never played against Gasol on the Lakers is hardly a reason to go by.
Every game is different and may the best team win.
Just trying to be objective and not look thru purple and gold colored glasses all the time.
I am a Celtics fan but I am not going to predict a sweep or that the C's are going to crush the Lakers. Do I have concerns? Sure I do.
I am not going to say the Lakers are going to win because the Celtics suck on the road. They were the best road team during the regular season. They sucked on the road in rounds 1 and 2. Just because they won 2 games on the road against Detroit doesn't mean their worries are over.
I hate the 2,3,2 finals format. I think it favors the Lakers.
Would I be shocked if the Lakers win the championship. No.
But I feel the Celtics will win the series in, why not, 7 games.
From an objective fan, the Lakers have my respect. May the best team bring home the trophy.
Best of Luck
Boston is favoured to win game 1. If they win, like they're supposed to, why would the line change a bunch? You see large swings in series prices when ROAD teams win.
The best chance to bet Boston will be after LA takes 1 of the first 2 games on the road...
Boston is favoured to win game 1. If they win, like they're supposed to, why would the line change a bunch? You see large swings in series prices when ROAD teams win.
The best chance to bet Boston will be after LA takes 1 of the first 2 games on the road...
I completely agree, and I'm not just saying that as a Laker fan. As an NBA fan in general this should be a VERY entertaining Finals. No boring Spurs or Pistons, and no mockery of the game of basketball with the Cavs...watching one man try to win it by himself. This year we truly have two very entertaining TEAMS who play TEAM basketball, and they're both fun to watch. ![]()
I completely agree, and I'm not just saying that as a Laker fan. As an NBA fan in general this should be a VERY entertaining Finals. No boring Spurs or Pistons, and no mockery of the game of basketball with the Cavs...watching one man try to win it by himself. This year we truly have two very entertaining TEAMS who play TEAM basketball, and they're both fun to watch. ![]()
Just one thing you shouldn't forget.....the Lakers are 4-3 on the road in the playoffs (vs. better competition) while the Celtics are just 2-7 (including a combined 0-6 to the Hawks and Cavs). ![]()
Just one thing you shouldn't forget.....the Lakers are 4-3 on the road in the playoffs (vs. better competition) while the Celtics are just 2-7 (including a combined 0-6 to the Hawks and Cavs). ![]()
I completely agree, and I'm not just saying that as a Laker fan. As an NBA fan in general this should be a VERY entertaining Finals. No boring Spurs or Pistons, and no mockery of the game of basketball with the Cavs...watching one man try to win it by himself. This year we truly have two very entertaining TEAMS who play TEAM basketball, and they're both fun to watch. ![]()
Although it would be nice if the Lakers won
That would just be a great ending to the season for my man Kobe.
I completely agree, and I'm not just saying that as a Laker fan. As an NBA fan in general this should be a VERY entertaining Finals. No boring Spurs or Pistons, and no mockery of the game of basketball with the Cavs...watching one man try to win it by himself. This year we truly have two very entertaining TEAMS who play TEAM basketball, and they're both fun to watch. ![]()
Although it would be nice if the Lakers won
That would just be a great ending to the season for my man Kobe.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.