Normally, I stay out of the discussion when it comes to final results sniping. But, in the POD that lost, there was no scoring in the last 43 seconds of the game. A made basket (two or trey) would have possibly put the game over the total. Orlando would have been in fouling mode that would have inflated the score beyond the 187 total. You can make a case for luck being on the side of the under players in this game.
The Boston game was a lucky win. Overtime caused it to go over. When you''re on a roll like kk, luck will not only find you, but reward you like it did in this game.
Knicks score 45 by themselves in what turned out to be a 72 point fourth quarter, pushing the game over the total. A lot of points but they needed a combined 45 in the fourth to cover the totalr so it was a normal type of NBA game.
For those that won or stayed away from the losing POD, congratulations. Your luck/wisdom saved or won you money. It was a 1-1-1 night for the POD's. One unlucky loss, one lucky win and one outright win. kk goes 2-1 on the POD's and cashes for a seventh straight night. He could have had two lucky wins and finished 3-0 for the night. Yes, that Celtic game could have/should have gone under resulting in a 1-2 night. Rather be lucky that good applies in this situation So goes it in the world of risk taking.. 
Absolutely correct
Don't tell anyone here that you don't care. You care a lot but in the most pathetic way. You come into people's threads as soon as they start losing, you insult them and then you act like you're doing the rest of the board a favor. Guess what, no one needs your advice and no one will ever ask for it. Guys like you are completely useless to a forum because negativity is all you have to offer, nothing else. Absolutely pathetic!
Another correct, this guy (Delfino) he a hater 
Another correct, this guy (Delfino) he a hater
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
