Completely irrelevant to the thread but what are your thoughts if any on the Rays tonight. They have caught my eye as a best bet tonight on the diamond. Thanks
It turns out the Spurs are pretty tough coming off a loss, too
Completely irrelevant to the thread but what are your thoughts if any on the Rays tonight. They have caught my eye as a best bet tonight on the diamond. Thanks
Completely irrelevant to the thread but what are your thoughts if any on the Rays tonight. They have caught my eye as a best bet tonight on the diamond. Thanks
I meant this years playoffs.
Anytime a team challenged the Heat trying to take the series lead after game1, any team can have 1 bad game but the better, stronger teams will have at least 2 strong games in the 1st 3.
The Heat responded with a double digit win each time. winning by 37, 10, 18 11 and 23 pts.
5 wins by double digits with a 19.8 ave per game...............................good luck fading the Heat tonight.....................................![]()
I meant this years playoffs.
Anytime a team challenged the Heat trying to take the series lead after game1, any team can have 1 bad game but the better, stronger teams will have at least 2 strong games in the 1st 3.
The Heat responded with a double digit win each time. winning by 37, 10, 18 11 and 23 pts.
5 wins by double digits with a 19.8 ave per game...............................good luck fading the Heat tonight.....................................![]()
How do you figure Miami's the one who got lucky ?
The Spurs have won 1 of 8 quarters, that being the 4th when the Heat players claimed to be fatigued from the 7 game Pacer series, when there is some history that supports teams losing game 1 off 7 game series.
The Heat own the most effiecent offense of any team to make the finals since 1974 when the league started tracking TO'S to detrmine that.
What the Heat did to the Spurs was hardly luck, it was done by the most effiecent offense possibly the league has ever seen in the finals, just the facts boys...................................................![]()
Good luck if you have plans to fade the Heat in game 3.............................................![]()
How do you figure Miami's the one who got lucky ?
The Spurs have won 1 of 8 quarters, that being the 4th when the Heat players claimed to be fatigued from the 7 game Pacer series, when there is some history that supports teams losing game 1 off 7 game series.
The Heat own the most effiecent offense of any team to make the finals since 1974 when the league started tracking TO'S to detrmine that.
What the Heat did to the Spurs was hardly luck, it was done by the most effiecent offense possibly the league has ever seen in the finals, just the facts boys...................................................![]()
Good luck if you have plans to fade the Heat in game 3.............................................![]()
How do you figure Miami's the one who got lucky ?
The Spurs have won 1 of 8 quarters, that being the 4th when the Heat players claimed to be fatigued from the 7 game Pacer series, when there is some history that supports teams losing game 1 off 7 game series.
The Heat own the most effiecent offense of any team to make the finals since 1974 when the league started tracking TO'S to detrmine that.
What the Heat did to the Spurs was hardly luck, it was done by the most effiecent offense possibly the league has ever seen in the finals, just the facts boys...................................................![]()
Good luck if you have plans to fade the Heat in game 3.............................................![]()
How do you figure Miami's the one who got lucky ?
The Spurs have won 1 of 8 quarters, that being the 4th when the Heat players claimed to be fatigued from the 7 game Pacer series, when there is some history that supports teams losing game 1 off 7 game series.
The Heat own the most effiecent offense of any team to make the finals since 1974 when the league started tracking TO'S to detrmine that.
What the Heat did to the Spurs was hardly luck, it was done by the most effiecent offense possibly the league has ever seen in the finals, just the facts boys...................................................![]()
Good luck if you have plans to fade the Heat in game 3.............................................![]()
GL tonight. I now have more doubts than ever about the MIA's chances tonight.
Im playing SAS 1h and teaser MIA+6/over 183
GL tonight. I now have more doubts than ever about the MIA's chances tonight.
Im playing SAS 1h and teaser MIA+6/over 183
IMO Spurs has to take Chalmers as another mission. This guy, we have to admit, has been second best next to Lebron this Playoffs. I can live with Wade and Bosh , they're on and off, but if you take Chalmers out of the game , Lebron might not have another player next to him that can make himself a shot. In addition, I think that SOME adjustments has to be made regarding the Heat's 3 point shooting.
Interesting, you are basically saying everyone is a scoring threat and needs to be guarded. You do realize Wade and Bosh can easily score if left open also.
IMO Spurs has to take Chalmers as another mission. This guy, we have to admit, has been second best next to Lebron this Playoffs. I can live with Wade and Bosh , they're on and off, but if you take Chalmers out of the game , Lebron might not have another player next to him that can make himself a shot. In addition, I think that SOME adjustments has to be made regarding the Heat's 3 point shooting.
Interesting, you are basically saying everyone is a scoring threat and needs to be guarded. You do realize Wade and Bosh can easily score if left open also.
please refrain from name calling. very childish and immature, especially when you were wrong about the game.
In reality, I was smiling after your dismissive, i know better than you, attitude prior to game 2. you really thought the spurs would be up 2-0 heading home didn't you?
please refrain from name calling. very childish and immature, especially when you were wrong about the game.
In reality, I was smiling after your dismissive, i know better than you, attitude prior to game 2. you really thought the spurs would be up 2-0 heading home didn't you?
lol. i just read your post calling me a b*tch and saying i need a tissue because im crying.
please refrain from name calling. very childish and immature, especially when you were wrong about the game.
In reality, I was smiling after your dismissive, i know better than you, attitude prior to game 2. you really thought the spurs would be up 2-0 heading home didn't you?
lol. i just read your post calling me a b*tch and saying i need a tissue because im crying.
please refrain from name calling. very childish and immature, especially when you were wrong about the game.
In reality, I was smiling after your dismissive, i know better than you, attitude prior to game 2. you really thought the spurs would be up 2-0 heading home didn't you?
They have a great record looking at just about every angle. I think it is even more significant given the West conf is up and down much tougher to get through.
Spurs win handily tonight. I am intrigued what happens with Miami off a loss after tonight's game in a second road game.
They have a great record looking at just about every angle. I think it is even more significant given the West conf is up and down much tougher to get through.
Spurs win handily tonight. I am intrigued what happens with Miami off a loss after tonight's game in a second road game.
I hope we can be friends moving forward. It was immature of me to start a thread calling you out after Game 2, and I'm sorry about that.
If SAS lose tonight, you might get a chance to right your wrong (if it was a wrong). The series price for SAS will probably be around +200 if they are down 2-1.
I too despise MIA, but do my best to keep it from clouding my judgement. They are the Yankees of basketball.
I hope we can be friends moving forward. It was immature of me to start a thread calling you out after Game 2, and I'm sorry about that.
If SAS lose tonight, you might get a chance to right your wrong (if it was a wrong). The series price for SAS will probably be around +200 if they are down 2-1.
I too despise MIA, but do my best to keep it from clouding my judgement. They are the Yankees of basketball.
Wow, that makes almost no sense. Either way you will win your Spurs bets or your Miami series and look like a winner. ![]()
Wow, that makes almost no sense. Either way you will win your Spurs bets or your Miami series and look like a winner. ![]()
Great back-story MrBator.
I hope we can be friends moving forward. It was immature of me to start a thread calling you out after Game 2, and I'm sorry about that.
If SAS lose tonight, you might get a chance to right your wrong (if it was a wrong). The series price for SAS will probably be around +200 if they are down 2-1.
Great back-story MrBator.
I hope we can be friends moving forward. It was immature of me to start a thread calling you out after Game 2, and I'm sorry about that.
If SAS lose tonight, you might get a chance to right your wrong (if it was a wrong). The series price for SAS will probably be around +200 if they are down 2-1.
So excluding the last month of the regular season, that's 5 wins by a combined 90 points for the Spurs as a rested team following a double-digit loss.
Oh, you found the "Start New Topic" option? Ha, rarity.
Good sh!t ...
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted. A 2H play might be in order however.
Best of luck! Hope you hit, brother...
So excluding the last month of the regular season, that's 5 wins by a combined 90 points for the Spurs as a rested team following a double-digit loss.
Oh, you found the "Start New Topic" option? Ha, rarity.
Good sh!t ...
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted. A 2H play might be in order however.
Best of luck! Hope you hit, brother...
bator why not throw a few dimes on spurs +155 if you think your Heat series bet is dead in the water?
bator why not throw a few dimes on spurs +155 if you think your Heat series bet is dead in the water?
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted.
You mean for the 1st halves?
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted.
You mean for the 1st halves?
Da Spurs....large play I assume?
(Indians and Royals?)
Thks for posting
gl
I haven't placed any bets yet, but, yes, I intend to go large on the Spurs and I will definitely ride the Royals again. Other sides I'm liking in baseball as of right now are the Rays over the Red Sox, Flubs over the Reds, Indians over the Rangers, and Braves over the Padres.
HiHoldem, sorry for burying you (and me) on the Spurs moneyline on Sunday.
Da Spurs....large play I assume?
(Indians and Royals?)
Thks for posting
gl
I haven't placed any bets yet, but, yes, I intend to go large on the Spurs and I will definitely ride the Royals again. Other sides I'm liking in baseball as of right now are the Rays over the Red Sox, Flubs over the Reds, Indians over the Rangers, and Braves over the Padres.
HiHoldem, sorry for burying you (and me) on the Spurs moneyline on Sunday.
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted. A 2H play might be in order however.
You mean for 1st halves?
Yeah...1st Halves.
Insane situational numbers and records. Kudos on the research, Bates. First half info seems solid too, but the Pacers presented a similar schematic going home after a loss and it didn't present as history would have predicted. A 2H play might be in order however.
You mean for 1st halves?
Yeah...1st Halves.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,555
- Sunday 11/01/2026 474
- PART DEUX 213
- NFL LOCKED IN! 111,739
- Week 9 Money 16,106
- NCAA WEEK 9 (( 151 )) 9,605
- 76ers / Hornets OVER 212 1,421
- Sunday NFL 4,643
- ***Macwesties * Thur. Oct. 29 * Sun. Nov. 01, 2026 * NFL * Week #8 * Football Plays*** 7,894
- *EdgeHunter Sunday wk8 Browns VS Steelers!* 2,881
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
