Hey man , don't stop posting your picks...just because there are some jealous losers in here doesn't mean that there aren't some players out here appreciating the geniusness of your picks...I'm in a big hole right now ($450, idk for me that's big and it's now limiting my ability to place these picks you make. It fucking sucks ) but I'm tailing in hopes of getting out of this rut I'm in...U da man...![]()
![]()
Hornets/76ers parlay +278 odds
Hey man , don't stop posting your picks...just because there are some jealous losers in here doesn't mean that there aren't some players out here appreciating the geniusness of your picks...I'm in a big hole right now ($450, idk for me that's big and it's now limiting my ability to place these picks you make. It fucking sucks ) but I'm tailing in hopes of getting out of this rut I'm in...U da man...![]()
![]()
I do think your goal is possible as there are a few offshores that won't limit you and will take large bets (not millions though). You'll have to spread it out over numerous accounts, but nobody is going to give you liquidity.
I think you could do it now using multiple VPS, high quality proxies (or real IP's) and withdrawing using BTC.
I do think your goal is possible as there are a few offshores that won't limit you and will take large bets (not millions though). You'll have to spread it out over numerous accounts, but nobody is going to give you liquidity.
I think you could do it now using multiple VPS, high quality proxies (or real IP's) and withdrawing using BTC.
Hey man , don't stop posting your picks...just because there are some jealous losers in here doesn't mean that there aren't some players out here appreciating the geniusness of your picks...I'm in a big hole right now ($450, idk for me that's big and it's now limiting my ability to place these picks you make. It friggin sucks ) but I'm tailing in hopes of getting out of this rut I'm in...U da man...![]()
![]()
Hey man , don't stop posting your picks...just because there are some jealous losers in here doesn't mean that there aren't some players out here appreciating the geniusness of your picks...I'm in a big hole right now ($450, idk for me that's big and it's now limiting my ability to place these picks you make. It friggin sucks ) but I'm tailing in hopes of getting out of this rut I'm in...U da man...![]()
![]()
If Oklahoma City was a guaranteed win, do you not think I would have added them to the parlay today? If I had strong connections for the Lakers and then found connections for the Thunder that are enough to make me not want to bet the Lakers, yet I also do not bet the Thunder, one would consider this to be "undecided", correct? So many people want to ask, ask, ask, last time I checked not a single person has given me anything. I owe nobody anything. If I am not betting on a team, why do you want my prediction? I obviously do not have one if I am not betting on the game. After the Clippers win tomorrow I might not even post any more picks. My goal was to launch a sports betting hedge fund, and that is seeming to be impossible in 2019, there is no way for me to place millions of dollars worth of bets each day, Casinos do not like to lose money, they like to limit winners. Since no decentralized, censorship-free sports betting exchange exists, with liquidity, I don't see how a massive hedge fund could even work. That goal is the only reason why I give out my own personal bets each day.
dude....no need to get your panties in a bunch...i CLEARLY wished you the best and expressed appreciation for sharing..wasnt being un-neccesarily harsh at all....only took issue with the use of the word "impossible" in sports....well,actually with damn near anything in life..funnily enough,im sure youve had folk tell you its "impossible" to find the key to life/the universe within numbers but you must know that to be un-true from your own perspective.
sooooooo,i havent dug into this but do certainly find it extremely interesting and do not dismiss it out of hand by any stretch...have read some intriguing stuff in other parts of the web...was just wondering if you can explain to me the mandela effect and what is causing it and how??as it pertains to what you study......if you dont know what im talking about thats cool.
in any case,please continue to share..no-one here is against you..![]()
If Oklahoma City was a guaranteed win, do you not think I would have added them to the parlay today? If I had strong connections for the Lakers and then found connections for the Thunder that are enough to make me not want to bet the Lakers, yet I also do not bet the Thunder, one would consider this to be "undecided", correct? So many people want to ask, ask, ask, last time I checked not a single person has given me anything. I owe nobody anything. If I am not betting on a team, why do you want my prediction? I obviously do not have one if I am not betting on the game. After the Clippers win tomorrow I might not even post any more picks. My goal was to launch a sports betting hedge fund, and that is seeming to be impossible in 2019, there is no way for me to place millions of dollars worth of bets each day, Casinos do not like to lose money, they like to limit winners. Since no decentralized, censorship-free sports betting exchange exists, with liquidity, I don't see how a massive hedge fund could even work. That goal is the only reason why I give out my own personal bets each day.
dude....no need to get your panties in a bunch...i CLEARLY wished you the best and expressed appreciation for sharing..wasnt being un-neccesarily harsh at all....only took issue with the use of the word "impossible" in sports....well,actually with damn near anything in life..funnily enough,im sure youve had folk tell you its "impossible" to find the key to life/the universe within numbers but you must know that to be un-true from your own perspective.
sooooooo,i havent dug into this but do certainly find it extremely interesting and do not dismiss it out of hand by any stretch...have read some intriguing stuff in other parts of the web...was just wondering if you can explain to me the mandela effect and what is causing it and how??as it pertains to what you study......if you dont know what im talking about thats cool.
in any case,please continue to share..no-one here is against you..![]()
Hey ninja, I'm not talking about you...im a fan
Hey ninja, I'm not talking about you...im a fan
Hey ninja, I'm not talking about you...im a fan
all we did was say that the use of the word impossible was inappropriate/inaccurate...because it was...always has been and always will be in sports..now how in the actual fuqq does that make someone a jealous loser to simply point that out???i was nothing but supportive of the dude in sharing whatever he has no matter how he comes to those conclusions..maybe ya just need to stop being a delicate,sensitive,little flower...hmmm?
Hey ninja, I'm not talking about you...im a fan
all we did was say that the use of the word impossible was inappropriate/inaccurate...because it was...always has been and always will be in sports..now how in the actual fuqq does that make someone a jealous loser to simply point that out???i was nothing but supportive of the dude in sharing whatever he has no matter how he comes to those conclusions..maybe ya just need to stop being a delicate,sensitive,little flower...hmmm?
Saying that a Lakers win was impossible was clearly an error on his part. I don’t even know why he would risk his credibility on such strong language but to each their own.
Then he tries back track by saying thunder moneyline wasn’t an official pick therefore no gaurentee. As if all his official picks are gaurentees.
Saying that a Lakers win was impossible was clearly an error on his part. I don’t even know why he would risk his credibility on such strong language but to each their own.
Then he tries back track by saying thunder moneyline wasn’t an official pick therefore no gaurentee. As if all his official picks are gaurentees.
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said.
A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said.
A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said.
A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said.
A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
been tailing you for a few days now, amazing picks. keep up the good work and ignore the trolls
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
been tailing you for a few days now, amazing picks. keep up the good work and ignore the trolls
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
there you go again...its not knocking you at all,obviously in a short sample size youve been brilliant and a great asset to the community here and im sure everyone can agree on that...but to say that a team in a given game has 0% to lose is stupid,its ludicrous..not sure if you are even serious or not at this point....they could win by 60 points tommorow and that still doesnt change the fact that it is patently false to make such a claim pre-game...but whatever,keep using such terminology and all you will do is attract the idiocy and negativity which you should be trying to avoid....good luck as always,no ill-will meant from me...i hope that every single bet posted cashes so im not tryna bring anyone down at all.![]()
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
there you go again...its not knocking you at all,obviously in a short sample size youve been brilliant and a great asset to the community here and im sure everyone can agree on that...but to say that a team in a given game has 0% to lose is stupid,its ludicrous..not sure if you are even serious or not at this point....they could win by 60 points tommorow and that still doesnt change the fact that it is patently false to make such a claim pre-game...but whatever,keep using such terminology and all you will do is attract the idiocy and negativity which you should be trying to avoid....good luck as always,no ill-will meant from me...i hope that every single bet posted cashes so im not tryna bring anyone down at all.![]()
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed.
I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose.
Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed.
I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose.
Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
cool,like i keep saying i wish nothing but the best for any play you have...but being a fan of numbers you know that theres no such thing as 0% in sports till the game is finished...but i will be cheering the clippers on hard,make no mistake.
sooooo...can you help me out with the mandela effect??simulation is a very,very popular theory so i guess that must be right up your alley as explaining it all easily then??you are aware of it and know it is legit??
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
cool,like i keep saying i wish nothing but the best for any play you have...but being a fan of numbers you know that theres no such thing as 0% in sports till the game is finished...but i will be cheering the clippers on hard,make no mistake.
sooooo...can you help me out with the mandela effect??simulation is a very,very popular theory so i guess that must be right up your alley as explaining it all easily then??you are aware of it and know it is legit??
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
I know of it but I have no comment on it.
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
I know of it but I have no comment on it.
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
oh,nothing??please,i would appreciate any opinion or thought .....so you wont even say if you feel this is real??i know its real,theres thousands and thousands out there that are awake and know its real...something fuqqy is going on,we can all feel it...not a chance in hell this is all simultaneous "bad memory".................anyhow,keep on winning..i'll look out for your plays...good luck,dude.![]()
Sample size is subjective, I have tested and back-tested my system before ever wagering. The sample size you are referring to is the sample you have witnessed. I know my system, the Clippers are one of the strongest bets my system has generated. Too many connections for it to lose. Reality is not what you think it is, we live in a simulation. So I can make any kind of claim that my system allows.
oh,nothing??please,i would appreciate any opinion or thought .....so you wont even say if you feel this is real??i know its real,theres thousands and thousands out there that are awake and know its real...something fuqqy is going on,we can all feel it...not a chance in hell this is all simultaneous "bad memory".................anyhow,keep on winning..i'll look out for your plays...good luck,dude.![]()
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
You have already lost two "risk-free, 0% to lose" bets, so let's just say "very slim chance to lose" or "great +ev" or something about those bets
I like most of your picks and also this one, but have nothing to do with numerology and matrix worlds
Ask people what I bet on today and if that bet won. Enough said. A +694 parlay followed by a -116 parlay followed by a +278 parlay followed by the Clippers +205 tomorrow which has a 0% chance to lose? I don't care what anyone else is betting on, these are my bets.
You have already lost two "risk-free, 0% to lose" bets, so let's just say "very slim chance to lose" or "great +ev" or something about those bets
I like most of your picks and also this one, but have nothing to do with numerology and matrix worlds
The Clippers have a -10% of losing today.
The Clippers have a -10% of losing today.
The Clippers have a -10% of losing today.
Obv he bet the maximum on previous sure games, so now he's rebuilding bankroll (on a very good pace I admit)
The Clippers have a -10% of losing today.
Obv he bet the maximum on previous sure games, so now he's rebuilding bankroll (on a very good pace I admit)
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,806
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
256,969
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,126
-
9/12 🔥🔥??????
3,944
-
Saturday 09/12/2026
807
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,626
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
96,329
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,879
-
Buckeyes/Longhorns in game
1,011
-
***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 12, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #2 * College Football Plays***
4,568
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
