seems like too many boys playing with their panties and running their lips waaaaay tooo much... So what Britman riding Hawks... who cares... get over it...
by the line..many people taking Det + 7.5 so I feel Atl will win by 10 in the end... just a thought
0
seems like too many boys playing with their panties and running their lips waaaaay tooo much... So what Britman riding Hawks... who cares... get over it...
by the line..many people taking Det + 7.5 so I feel Atl will win by 10 in the end... just a thought
glad the Hawks won, doubled up in-game and got them at -4.5, was looking like a very close cover til the last 3mins, so not the blowout u predicted britman but glad we got the cover all the same, $$$
0
glad the Hawks won, doubled up in-game and got them at -4.5, was looking like a very close cover til the last 3mins, so not the blowout u predicted britman but glad we got the cover all the same, $$$
ahole coach leaves the worst player out there greg monroe with no drummond and no jennings
give me a break
You do know "luck" is an infantile term used by those ignorant of the randomness and predictability of certain outcomes?
You're looking at the negative side of the spectrum. You say "lucky" because some supposed random variable (coach deciding to leave out the worst players 'in your opinion'), which you saw in game, giving the hawks the opportunity to pull off.
On the positive side of the spectrum, a guy who bet hawks -7.5, makes his bet, then comes back 3-4 hours later, to see that he covered +3.5. He sees nothing about "luck" because he did not witness the random variables that occurred in game and all he sees is a RESULT.
You guys gotta stop putting this wall of ignorance over your heads, because it's hindering your progress. There is no such thing as luck. The math is everything. There is only results. That happen randomly, or with some level of predictability.
0
Quote Originally Posted by whatisthid:
lucky cover
ahole coach leaves the worst player out there greg monroe with no drummond and no jennings
give me a break
You do know "luck" is an infantile term used by those ignorant of the randomness and predictability of certain outcomes?
You're looking at the negative side of the spectrum. You say "lucky" because some supposed random variable (coach deciding to leave out the worst players 'in your opinion'), which you saw in game, giving the hawks the opportunity to pull off.
On the positive side of the spectrum, a guy who bet hawks -7.5, makes his bet, then comes back 3-4 hours later, to see that he covered +3.5. He sees nothing about "luck" because he did not witness the random variables that occurred in game and all he sees is a RESULT.
You guys gotta stop putting this wall of ignorance over your heads, because it's hindering your progress. There is no such thing as luck. The math is everything. There is only results. That happen randomly, or with some level of predictability.
Hot Forum Topics
