To tell you the truth, I really don't give a krap. Don't need an embellished resume
![]()
To tell you the truth, I really don't give a krap. Don't need an embellished resume
![]()
hahahaha
u guys spend wayyyyyy to much time on covers.
Oh, what? Now you're better than us? You're here every day, too, ya schmuck. Give me a break. Fuck you.
hahahaha
u guys spend wayyyyyy to much time on covers.
Oh, what? Now you're better than us? You're here every day, too, ya schmuck. Give me a break. Fuck you.
Oh, what? Now you're better than us? You're here every day, too, ya schmuck. Give me a break. Fuck you.
i have no problem with ya.....nothing could possibly bother me or get me worked up over a fucking computer
but i stick by what i said earlier....it would be 1 thing if i was the only one who said or thinks that....i have seen 3 other people say the exact same thing about u in threads u posted in.....its not just me so its obviously not just coming from left field
good luck in the future
Oh, what? Now you're better than us? You're here every day, too, ya schmuck. Give me a break. Fuck you.
i have no problem with ya.....nothing could possibly bother me or get me worked up over a fucking computer
but i stick by what i said earlier....it would be 1 thing if i was the only one who said or thinks that....i have seen 3 other people say the exact same thing about u in threads u posted in.....its not just me so its obviously not just coming from left field
good luck in the future
Come to think of it, can you cite any other examples in the last two weeks, or two months, or whatever - where I bought out of a play? Because off the top of my head, I can't remember. But if you can jog my memory, I'm sure I can explain exactly what happened and why I did it. You know, if that would ease your mind and make you more comfortable with what I'm doing.
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
Come to think of it, can you cite any other examples in the last two weeks, or two months, or whatever - where I bought out of a play? Because off the top of my head, I can't remember. But if you can jog my memory, I'm sure I can explain exactly what happened and why I did it. You know, if that would ease your mind and make you more comfortable with what I'm doing.
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
willneverstop, I'd like to thank you for spurring me on to risk almost twice the amount on that game than I originally intended. You're a pal.
willneverstop, I'd like to thank you for spurring me on to risk almost twice the amount on that game than I originally intended. You're a pal.
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
Changed my mind. Cashed in big. It was awesome! I'm grateful to the New York Jets.
![]()
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
Changed my mind. Cashed in big. It was awesome! I'm grateful to the New York Jets.
![]()
willneverstop, I'd like to thank you for spurring me on to risk almost twice the amount on that game than I originally intended. You're a pal.
willneverstop, I'd like to thank you for spurring me on to risk almost twice the amount on that game than I originally intended. You're a pal.
Whatever, willywagtail. Why are you commenting on my money management? Do you know how much I have in my bankroll? No, you don't. So how would you know if almost doubling my wager on the Bulls is overbetting?
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
Whatever, willywagtail. Why are you commenting on my money management? Do you know how much I have in my bankroll? No, you don't. So how would you know if almost doubling my wager on the Bulls is overbetting?
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
Wow, that's deep.
Wow, that's deep.
Changed my mind. Cashed in big. It was awesome! I'm grateful to the New York Jets.
![]()
Changed my mind. Cashed in big. It was awesome! I'm grateful to the New York Jets.
![]()
Whatever, willywagtail. Why are you commenting on my money management? Do you know how much I have in my bankroll? No, you don't. So how would you know if almost doubling my wager on the Bulls is overbetting?
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
Whatever, willywagtail. Why are you commenting on my money management? Do you know how much I have in my bankroll? No, you don't. So how would you know if almost doubling my wager on the Bulls is overbetting?
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
Your nitpicking is getting tiresome. You make a lot of assumptions about me while having very little information about how I work. Go find another professor to teach you how to bet on sports.
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
Bator's a big boy. He certainly doesn't need my pea brain to defend him (I say pea brain in comparison to people in the real world, not this forum), but...
Talk about piecing words together to change the context of meaning...
I'll defer to the post below because I vividly remember the discussion recently , which happened to take place more than 4 hours before kickoff of the aforementioned game.
See post #6 below
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100951444
I am not going to look for the thread, because it isn't that important to me, but MrBator was CLEARLY on the Jets before the start of the game. Willywagtail: I don't recommend pursuing a career in research, but I do implore to continue to ignore facts and reality and continue to live in your ignorant, blissful world.
The real story of what this ridiculous thread has turned into is that bettors who are incapable of abandoning prior thoughts or initial leans and hold steadfast onto those beliefs are ultimately destined for failure. This may help to explain some of the disdain demonstrated in this thread. This may also help to explain why these same said individuals bashing are perennial losers.
How did the bitching in this thread turn out for everyone anyway?
I think he's probably talking about the Jets/Pats game where you said the following sentences.
'Play the Jets at your own risk, guys. I won't.'
'I have no action on the game. I probably would've taken the Jets but they just wouldn't shut up and I would never bet on a team that's taunting the quietly vindictive Patriots.'
And then a conflicting statement.
'Jets +10 -118 and +9.5 +107 look fabulous. My Jets moneyline action.......uh, doesn't exist (shit). Jets +9.5 in the 2nd half looks great. Bears/Pats teasers are doomed.'
Bator's a big boy. He certainly doesn't need my pea brain to defend him (I say pea brain in comparison to people in the real world, not this forum), but...
Talk about piecing words together to change the context of meaning...
I'll defer to the post below because I vividly remember the discussion recently , which happened to take place more than 4 hours before kickoff of the aforementioned game.
See post #6 below
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100951444
I am not going to look for the thread, because it isn't that important to me, but MrBator was CLEARLY on the Jets before the start of the game. Willywagtail: I don't recommend pursuing a career in research, but I do implore to continue to ignore facts and reality and continue to live in your ignorant, blissful world.
The real story of what this ridiculous thread has turned into is that bettors who are incapable of abandoning prior thoughts or initial leans and hold steadfast onto those beliefs are ultimately destined for failure. This may help to explain some of the disdain demonstrated in this thread. This may also help to explain why these same said individuals bashing are perennial losers.
How did the bitching in this thread turn out for everyone anyway?
See post #6 below
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100951444
I am not going to look for the thread, because it isn't that important to me, but MrBator was CLEARLY on the Jets before the start of the game. Willywagtail: I don't recommend pursuing a career in research, but I do implore to continue to ignore facts and reality and continue to live in your ignorant, blissful world.
See post #6 below
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=100951444
I am not going to look for the thread, because it isn't that important to me, but MrBator was CLEARLY on the Jets before the start of the game. Willywagtail: I don't recommend pursuing a career in research, but I do implore to continue to ignore facts and reality and continue to live in your ignorant, blissful world.
Wow, that's deep.
Wow, that's deep.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.