This System has hit 21 in a row

Looks like a parlay Toronto/San Diego????

There should be 2 solid plays today.

Fading Angels

Fading Rangers

I do not think the Mets qualified as a play yesterday and I do not think MJ will count it as a play. But to be fair, he did not count Arizona as a play a couple weeks ago.

I do believe that both plays today easily qualify.

My plan is to bet on Toronto, if they win, I will bet the Padres. If Toronto loses, I'm out. 

I'll stay on board until I personally lose one. Whenever that happens, I'm out.

Good luck today, whatever u decide.

Falcon Sports 

@MITM

 Been a incredible run. I was thinking the same on the early game and playing late if the streak continues.

Good luck all today.

@MITM

 Clearly going to be a struggle today as they are getting to Berrios early. 5 hits, 2 walks in just the 3rd inning. Only a 1 run so far but cannot keep them down much longer with all these base runners.

Need some Blue Jays offense and to get to Anderson.

@witswits

 LAA has scored first every game in the series. Toronto been doing their damage later

I'm in on Toronto also but if they lose. I'm done, if they win, ill ride Padres. 

Knew we lost when I seen them bring in Garcia as they shoulda left Jackson in to pitch another. 

But on a great note, What a great run and profit is profit.

It was an unbelievable run.

My COLD BATS ended at 25 straight losses yesterday, when the Nationals smoked the Mets.

Had a feeling it would happen today to the Blue Jays and put some on LAA.

Either way, glad you made the thread and let everyone know. Isn't that what the forum is supposed to be about?

You did good work!

this all said, this system may or may not be something of value.  one can look at just about any period of time, and trial 100 systems, and one is going to look unbeatable.  does it hold up for the long run?  this is where you need to  look at type I errors, etc but even then it is distored because there was "cherry picking"  

again, like a few others commented or implied.

just be cautious.  the people who set the lines generally do not make mistakes.  I would be shocked if this system held up over hundreds of games.

it is probably break even (lose the juice) like so many other quick fix systems.

dont mean to rain on anybody's parade

[Quote: Originally Posted by MrBator]Play against a road dog of greater than +150 if they scored 2 runs or less in each of their last two games....That's the system. It's undefeated this season with the first victim being the Tigers on April 22nd who lost 5-1 in Baltimore as a +155 dog.

Outstanding system my brother, you're as solid as solid comes

later

Fade Rockies tonight

@JDollazz

 they won yesterday

It doesn't matter whether the qualifying "play against" team won or lost either or both of its last two games. All that matters is that they scored less than 3 runs in each one and are now a road dog of greater than +150.

@MrBator

 my bad jdollaz  i thought it was 2 or more Ls and 2 or less runs. thanks MB

What's the play ml or spread against the rockies?

Fade the road team if they have scored two or fewer runs in 2 straight games, while on the road and are at least a (+150) dog tonight.

Fade Rocky Balboa again I guess.

8/8:  Fade Rockies, take the Brewers ML. 

Fade Rockies once again tonight

No one can argue about this system,but if a newbie is just catching on for tonight's play,wouldn't it be better to take the Dodgers on the RL @-137 than the ML @ -310?

@collectNOW

 Had anyone looked to see if the RL was as profitable as the ML? All plays are  -150 favorites or higher, but it would be interesting to know what the RL produced profit.

@witswits

 I actually think the run line -1 1/2 is a better bet when the dog is +200 or higher....favorite wins by exactly 1 run about 25% of the time, but the payback is usually twice as much on run line (i.e. -137 vs -310 in dodger game today) so in the long run better off with r/l....this is better when big favorite is on the road since 1 run in extra innings by home team ends the game

stros rl

guardians ml

The angle isn't for the run line. When you have something that works you stick with what is working, you change the formula it may work it may not but it's not likely to be as good, a lot of games end in 1 run victories that's why the run line is 1.5

This angle is fading a road team and the home team if they are up 1 they don't bat in the 9th, if they are up 2 they will gladly let 1 run score to record an out. So i don't need to look anything up to know it doesn't work as well.

Isn't 25 wins in a row enough for you? Don't get greedy.

One reason most guys are lifetime losers is they won't just play one game and leave it at that, they won't take short prices on a single game they have to do parlays of 3 big favorites and that's not gonna work most of the time one lets you down.

Dude, this thread is tracking a specific angle, why are you posting your picks in it that have nothing to do with the trend? Please start your own thread.

Most likely only Colorado fits the fade spot on Sunday and they're like -390