Posted:
#126
Why isn't Milwaukee a play also? Even? 
0
The one and only MLB System!!!
Impatient people = gamblers.
Posted:
#129
Quote Originally Posted by duby:
I dont want to bash but something doesnt add up....
Since playing this and no other sports betting whatsoever since 2005 I have profited somewhere in the $70 000 - $80 000 neighborhood. I wager $50 on all qualified plays no more no less
By doing math $70 000/6 seasons/50$ units = 233 units
Which means you would have made an avg of +233 units per year??!!??!!
Am I missing something here
Best of luck this season
0
Posted:
#130
Guys, I cant believe ya!
This system is tony stoffo's worthless, bs underdog system. It doesnt work. You will end season breakeven or loss. Dont believe in 70k hoax!
also, even if you're using system, you can't start now because top20 list is not available. (last season's list is available) you should wait at least every starter has 3 games under belt.
0
if you want
Posted:
#132
The books clearly know about this system. Though I've never heard of it before today, apparently it's all over the internet.
Go a head and check for yourself...
Just type in "Baseball Underdog System" into Google and just look at all the articles and forum threads - not far off from this thread as well - that feature this "system".
You'd think with a system this widely known, more people would make money off it and more of us would have heard of it before. But that doesn't seem to be the case.
I'm not implying anything, just saying...
Tread carefully with this.
0
Posted:
#133
I don't have time to figure out the underdog part of the system so if i were to play the under system tomomorows plays would be.......
Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) - Under 7 -125
San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Under 7 -115
Boston (Lester) vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105
Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) Under 6.5 -115
That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works
0
Posted:
#135
First...he said dont play anything that opens above +150...if you were going to try it now...hers a suggestion for a couple of weeks and should be relatively easy to decipher...don't make a play is the pitcher could legitimately be a top twenty pitcher in two to three weeks...Safe plays for a pre system tommorrow would be....Cleveland...KC...San Fran.
0
Posted:
#136
Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) TOP TWENTY STUD NO PLAY(you gotta know that)- Under 7 -125 NO PLAY
San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Could be top twenty but I don't think so.Under 7 -115 I'd PLAY
Boston (Lester) STUD..HELLO.vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105 HELL TO THE NAW
Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) STUD!!!!Under 6.5 -115 HELLLLLLLLL NO
That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works
0
Posted:
#142
Quote Originally Posted by zlajci:
I ve made some math,
regarding the 50$ stake and 70k of profit.
If Maglio has made 10% return of his investment, which is great yield, he needed 14000 of picks.
For 15% roi, which is fantastic, he needed 9334 picks.
For 20% roi, which is almost unbelievable, he still needed 7000 picks.
I ve made some math,
regarding the 50$ stake and 70k of profit.
If Maglio has made 10% return of his investment, which is great yield, he needed 14000 of picks.
For 15% roi, which is fantastic, he needed 9334 picks.
For 20% roi, which is almost unbelievable, he still needed 7000 picks.
Haha guys you really can't be that retarded lol! He said he has made this amount since 2005. lol Try to keep up and actually read the whole thread because this has been covered over four times!!!
0
Posted:
#144
Quote Originally Posted by juveunits:
I don't have time to figure out the underdog part of the system so if i were to play the under system tomomorows plays would be.......
Houston (Myers) vs. Philly (Halladay) - Under 7 -125
San Fran (Sanchez) vs. LA (Billingsley) Under 7 -115
Boston (Lester) vs. Texas (wilson) Under 8.5 +105
Seaatle (Hernandez) vs Oakland (Cahill) Under 6.5 -115
That's according to last years ratings. I think it's only those 4 games. Lets see how well it works
0
Posted:
#145
Quote Originally Posted by JoshLewis:
Guys, I cant believe ya!
Guys, I cant believe ya!
This system is tony stoffo's worthless, bs underdog system. It doesnt work. You will end season breakeven or loss. Dont believe in 70k hoax!
also, even if you're using system, you can't start now because top20 list is not available. (last season's list is available) you should wait at least every starter has 3 games under belt.
thats what i been saying, carlos silva and ubaldo had under 1.0 era after 3 starts in 2010. both of them had their era rise. so in theory if carlos and ubaldo met on game four we would know what to do/not do, its just the first damn GAME. haha
you cant use this theory/method the first week or 2nd week unless your basing it off of last years stats.
0
Posted:
#146
Quote Originally Posted by She7154:
i think it's a solid system. i think timing is everything here. i would say 2-3 weeks into the season thru the all star break would be most profitable. (in my opinion.)
i think it's a solid system. i think timing is everything here. i would say 2-3 weeks into the season thru the all star break would be most profitable. (in my opinion.)
i'll definitely be following this system and possibly even tweeking it at little bit. i'll post as much as possible, but i'm sure if i don't others will.. or people can just figure it all out on their own. shouldn't take more than 15 minutes.
thanks for your input.
there's a detailed outline of this system with proof that it works here
this article is exactly the same system.. if you don't understand what the poster has said the you must read this.
thanks she7154
0
Hot Forum Topics
