Reading your previous posts, sounds like you know just about everything.(which I highly doubt).You just sound to me like a loser venting
I def. do not know everything, first of all.
Secondly, if this guy won that much money off this simple system, then why wouldn't he have simply raised his units, and made more?
And lastly, just like KineProfessor did over in the CBB forum, once his system was let out, it started doing bad, maybe vegas caught on, maybe they didn't, but it wouldn't be smart to let out a profitable system.
Why the attack?
0
Quote Originally Posted by mrenigma:
Reading your previous posts, sounds like you know just about everything.(which I highly doubt).You just sound to me like a loser venting
I def. do not know everything, first of all.
Secondly, if this guy won that much money off this simple system, then why wouldn't he have simply raised his units, and made more?
And lastly, just like KineProfessor did over in the CBB forum, once his system was let out, it started doing bad, maybe vegas caught on, maybe they didn't, but it wouldn't be smart to let out a profitable system.
Secondly, if this guy won that much money off this simple system, then why wouldn't he have simply raised his units, and made more?
And lastly, just like KineProfessor did over in the CBB forum, once his system was let out, it started doing bad, maybe vegas caught on, maybe they didn't, but it wouldn't be smart to let out a profitable system.
Why the attack?
I respect your opinion here.I sense alot of negativity here from you but I understand your reservations.
This as like most sports betting or any good money investment is a long term investment. I wager what I am comfortable betting and no more.You see you never know when a dry spell (losing streak) will present itself and believe me it will. And this is going to sound really weird and but although I know this system works I still remain leery and uncertain. This is why I refuse to raise my bets. The ultra conservative side in me I guess. Although it hasn't yet I'm still waiting for the system to fail so to speak. I started with a $1000 bankroll back in 05 and if there were any point in which I would have had to replug my account to fund this system I would have quit immediately.
0
Quote Originally Posted by drose1:
I def. do not know everything, first of all.
Secondly, if this guy won that much money off this simple system, then why wouldn't he have simply raised his units, and made more?
And lastly, just like KineProfessor did over in the CBB forum, once his system was let out, it started doing bad, maybe vegas caught on, maybe they didn't, but it wouldn't be smart to let out a profitable system.
Why the attack?
I respect your opinion here.I sense alot of negativity here from you but I understand your reservations.
This as like most sports betting or any good money investment is a long term investment. I wager what I am comfortable betting and no more.You see you never know when a dry spell (losing streak) will present itself and believe me it will. And this is going to sound really weird and but although I know this system works I still remain leery and uncertain. This is why I refuse to raise my bets. The ultra conservative side in me I guess. Although it hasn't yet I'm still waiting for the system to fail so to speak. I started with a $1000 bankroll back in 05 and if there were any point in which I would have had to replug my account to fund this system I would have quit immediately.
played this system 2 yrs ago from a post on vegas insider yes it did work into about 1/2 the season. And it was easy 15 minutes a day easy money then it went south and so did I. But going to go after it again this year may tweak it. Mark down all the dogs under 150 then look at the starting pitchers no going against top 20 ( i stretch that at times) then look at win and losing streaks.I put 4 percent of bank roll so when it builds bigger bets that was when It went south then gave up. When you hit a dog getting 125-150 that is a good win adds up.Remenmber the worst team last yr pitts still won over 35 percent of their gms, you get oods with those wins
0
played this system 2 yrs ago from a post on vegas insider yes it did work into about 1/2 the season. And it was easy 15 minutes a day easy money then it went south and so did I. But going to go after it again this year may tweak it. Mark down all the dogs under 150 then look at the starting pitchers no going against top 20 ( i stretch that at times) then look at win and losing streaks.I put 4 percent of bank roll so when it builds bigger bets that was when It went south then gave up. When you hit a dog getting 125-150 that is a good win adds up.Remenmber the worst team last yr pitts still won over 35 percent of their gms, you get oods with those wins
Maglio, there r certain people on covers that dispute everything,people like drose1 .You laid out your system perfectly and if they dont believe it so what .I would not respond to people like drose1 whatever u say they will dispute.Thanks for the system input its definitely worth a try.
0
Maglio, there r certain people on covers that dispute everything,people like drose1 .You laid out your system perfectly and if they dont believe it so what .I would not respond to people like drose1 whatever u say they will dispute.Thanks for the system input its definitely worth a try.
I frequent the boards here but don't post. Anyhow I currently bet on baseball almost as a full time profession. If I didn't love my job so much I would bet on baseball only. I met someone about 7-8 years ago and he told me about this system and I've been playing it ever since.
Since playing this and no other sports betting whatsoever since 2005 I have profited somewhere in the $70 000 - $80 000 neighborhood. I wager $50 on all qualified plays no more no less no matter how much I may love or not love the pick (very important imo). I don't even really watch that much baseball. I simply see which games qualify wager on them and come back the next morning to do it all over again.
On top of discipline and money management there are 3 very easy keys to follow to make this work as history has proven.
Just a heads up all wagers are bets on the underdog moneyline.
1. Don't bet against any 3 game streakswhether it be losing or winning streaks.
2. Do no bet any underdog which opens at more than +150.
3. Eliminate all games going up against top 20 pitchers according to ERA.
On a decent day there should be anywhere from 2-8 games that qualify.
Best of luck!
? do you use top 20era from each league or top 20 in baseball. appreciate your response.
thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by Maglio:
I frequent the boards here but don't post. Anyhow I currently bet on baseball almost as a full time profession. If I didn't love my job so much I would bet on baseball only. I met someone about 7-8 years ago and he told me about this system and I've been playing it ever since.
Since playing this and no other sports betting whatsoever since 2005 I have profited somewhere in the $70 000 - $80 000 neighborhood. I wager $50 on all qualified plays no more no less no matter how much I may love or not love the pick (very important imo). I don't even really watch that much baseball. I simply see which games qualify wager on them and come back the next morning to do it all over again.
On top of discipline and money management there are 3 very easy keys to follow to make this work as history has proven.
Just a heads up all wagers are bets on the underdog moneyline.
1. Don't bet against any 3 game streakswhether it be losing or winning streaks.
2. Do no bet any underdog which opens at more than +150.
3. Eliminate all games going up against top 20 pitchers according to ERA.
On a decent day there should be anywhere from 2-8 games that qualify.
Best of luck!
? do you use top 20era from each league or top 20 in baseball. appreciate your response.
played this system 2 yrs ago from a post on vegas insider yes it did work into about 1/2 the season. And it was easy 15 minutes a day easy money then it went south and so did I. But going to go after it again this year may tweak it. Mark down all the dogs under 150 then look at the starting pitchers no going against top 20 ( i stretch that at times) then look at win and losing streaks.I put 4 percent of bank roll so when it builds bigger bets that was when It went south then gave up. When you hit a dog getting 125-150 that is a good win adds up.Remenmber the worst team last yr pitts still won over 35 percent of their gms, you get oods with those wins
bigger bets is insane.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mynameken:
played this system 2 yrs ago from a post on vegas insider yes it did work into about 1/2 the season. And it was easy 15 minutes a day easy money then it went south and so did I. But going to go after it again this year may tweak it. Mark down all the dogs under 150 then look at the starting pitchers no going against top 20 ( i stretch that at times) then look at win and losing streaks.I put 4 percent of bank roll so when it builds bigger bets that was when It went south then gave up. When you hit a dog getting 125-150 that is a good win adds up.Remenmber the worst team last yr pitts still won over 35 percent of their gms, you get oods with those wins
Maglio....Thanks for sharing this jewel with us...No matter how much us Cappers try to help each other out, remember there's always a Hater in the mix....Some one out there always wants to see you fail!!....Let's get this $$ this Season buddy!!...Thanks again....
Death To ALL Haters, Bashers and all you other squarez hating on FREE INFORMATION!!!......Chuuuch.....Oh yea, go get that new Snoop Album "Doggumentary"
0
Maglio....Thanks for sharing this jewel with us...No matter how much us Cappers try to help each other out, remember there's always a Hater in the mix....Some one out there always wants to see you fail!!....Let's get this $$ this Season buddy!!...Thanks again....
Death To ALL Haters, Bashers and all you other squarez hating on FREE INFORMATION!!!......Chuuuch.....Oh yea, go get that new Snoop Album "Doggumentary"
sir , maglio...u r a man...this is in fact a proven METHOD,systems are fallible..methods are better ....this is strong as mule pisss....and it behooves the disciplined gambler....for degenerates it will not sho much -/+ either way,......I love that u know the 3in a row rule.....the ud opening at over +150 is very interesting,ive seen it with any dog, in this case i trust u and will listen explicitlly to these instructions...whew that wasnt ez to spit out....my thought was with drose in that wow this idiot tell everyone....but it is a WINNinG method, i wont call it a system...i will do this starting tomorrow. are there any little details u mightv forgotten? sound ez enough. thx for sharing...thx. big poo.
bigFnPOO
0
sir , maglio...u r a man...this is in fact a proven METHOD,systems are fallible..methods are better ....this is strong as mule pisss....and it behooves the disciplined gambler....for degenerates it will not sho much -/+ either way,......I love that u know the 3in a row rule.....the ud opening at over +150 is very interesting,ive seen it with any dog, in this case i trust u and will listen explicitlly to these instructions...whew that wasnt ez to spit out....my thought was with drose in that wow this idiot tell everyone....but it is a WINNinG method, i wont call it a system...i will do this starting tomorrow. are there any little details u mightv forgotten? sound ez enough. thx for sharing...thx. big poo.
I am using a Labby line playing MLB underdogs in a similar system. Only playing one game at a time though so it's a little different than identifying 6-8 games and betting them all.
Best of luck this year to everyone.
0
I am using a Labby line playing MLB underdogs in a similar system. Only playing one game at a time though so it's a little different than identifying 6-8 games and betting them all.
I have used this method myself last few years and it is solid. It basically is an easy way to derive value from an MLB line. I used it with the Top 20 Pitcher in MLB past few years.
Do you filter out games according to Top 20 pitcher in NL and AL or MLB overall? Would limit the games but might be better way of finding even better value.
0
I have used this method myself last few years and it is solid. It basically is an easy way to derive value from an MLB line. I used it with the Top 20 Pitcher in MLB past few years.
Do you filter out games according to Top 20 pitcher in NL and AL or MLB overall? Would limit the games but might be better way of finding even better value.
In order to have a system that works and correctly predicts the future...you first must understand why it works. Can someone explain in detail why this works without using back fed results?
0
In order to have a system that works and correctly predicts the future...you first must understand why it works. Can someone explain in detail why this works without using back fed results?
Hot Forum Topics
