Hornets 1Q ![]()
Knicks 1Q (Game was in Chicago so no play- misread it earlier)
Clippers 4Q ![]()
Rockets 4Q ![]()
That's more like it!!!![]()
Hornets 1Q ![]()
Knicks 1Q (Game was in Chicago so no play- misread it earlier)
Clippers 4Q ![]()
Rockets 4Q ![]()
That's more like it!!!![]()
Sunday Quarters Information:
Clippers 4Q (9-2 home) vs Raptors (5-7 road)
Thunder 1Q (9-3 home) vs Pacers (4-7 road)
Knicks 1Q (7-0 at MSG) vs Nuggets (5-9 road)
Lakers 1Q (10-2 at home) vs Jazz (4-5 road)
Magic 1Q (3-7 on road) vs Suns (1-6 home)
Not sure what games I will play...probably see what info on these games comes in from the guys with real skills.
Sunday Quarters Information:
Clippers 4Q (9-2 home) vs Raptors (5-7 road)
Thunder 1Q (9-3 home) vs Pacers (4-7 road)
Knicks 1Q (7-0 at MSG) vs Nuggets (5-9 road)
Lakers 1Q (10-2 at home) vs Jazz (4-5 road)
Magic 1Q (3-7 on road) vs Suns (1-6 home)
Not sure what games I will play...probably see what info on these games comes in from the guys with real skills.
Did anybody get to see Pacquiao get Knocked the F out? Wow, what a shot by a wounded Marquez! +200 for the fight ending in less than 10.5 so it was even sweeter for me to see a knockout.
Anxious to see Angle and the crew destroy the NFL board tomorrow...Ravens line has gone from pk to +3 back to +1. Definitely following Semper on the Chiefs.
Best of luck to all and to all a good night- in my Santa voice!
Did anybody get to see Pacquiao get Knocked the F out? Wow, what a shot by a wounded Marquez! +200 for the fight ending in less than 10.5 so it was even sweeter for me to see a knockout.
Anxious to see Angle and the crew destroy the NFL board tomorrow...Ravens line has gone from pk to +3 back to +1. Definitely following Semper on the Chiefs.
Best of luck to all and to all a good night- in my Santa voice!
Trends are now 26-14-1, 65.0 percent ATS over the last four weeks. As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. Now, two of the angles we had last week have no qualifying plays in Week 14, so we kick thing off with two angles that we have been successful with in the past but have had several weeks off, one of which is 17-4 ATS this season!
All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Also, you will occasionally see angles that refer to Good Teams and/or Bad Teams, such as in our leading angle. We are not using those terms subjectively in those contexts, but rather, Good Teams are strictly defined as teams that have won at least 10 of their last 16 games and Bad Teams are defined as teams that have lost at least 10 of their last 16 games.
It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs, and this angle also adds in the motivation off wanting to bounce back after a loss. This angle is an amazing 17-4 ATS so far in 2012! Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, and Philly +7.5 to 8.
The very definition of being contrarian is betting on teams that the general public wants no part of, and this angle combines three things that the public likes to avoid, as these are teams that are generally bad to begin with, they are on losing streaks and they are on the road. And yet, check out this winning % over a very nice-sized sampling. Qualifiers: Detroit +7, 7.5 to 8 and Tennessee +5 to 6 (buy to 7 if +6).
Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (170-108-5, 61.2% ATS): The logic behind this angle is the same as the previous angle with two exceptions, as it does not matter if the team playing its second straight road game won or lost its previous game, and also it is restricted to conference games only as now facing a familiar foe lessens the travel effect since the team usually knows how to attack that foe and what to expect on defense. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 13. Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, Philadelphia +7.5 to 8 and Houston +3.5 to 4 (Monday).
Angle #4 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (61-42-3, 59.2% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle pushed its only play in Week 13. Qualifier: Houston +3.5 to 4 at New England (Monday).
Angle #5 - Play on any Bad Team on the road that was an underdog in each of its last four games (101-65-2, 60.8% ATS): Playing this angle may take some courage as it often points you to the dregs of the league, and on the road no less! But that is precisely the point as these teams often offer great value with no novice bettors wanting any part of them, as evidenced by the excellent winning % over a nice sampling. This angle split 1-1 in Week 13. Qualifier: Kansas City +7.5 to 8.
McTrendz plays NO, Phi, Det and Ariz.
Double angles for this week Ariz, NO, Philly and Hou. (Probably a parlay there and extra unit on singles especially if you consider Ariz, NO and Philly are McTrendz plays as well!!!)
Believe it or not, Dallas Cryboys +4 to 5 becomes a GM4 of 4 chase play in a system I sometimes play but don't post as they are 4 game chases. (I will hold my nose and go with it as I HATE the Cowboys, but small play and hope Cincy wins by 3). It is supposed to be a strong play, so 2 units max for me. I RARELY bet on the Cowboys, and FOR THE LOVE OF GOD I hate that they are in a system that rarely loses 4 game chase!
Other plays I like Tenn +6 or buy to 7 if one point buy. Jets -2 GM1 of 2 buy down from 3 to at least -2.5.
Trends are now 26-14-1, 65.0 percent ATS over the last four weeks. As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. Now, two of the angles we had last week have no qualifying plays in Week 14, so we kick thing off with two angles that we have been successful with in the past but have had several weeks off, one of which is 17-4 ATS this season!
All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Also, you will occasionally see angles that refer to Good Teams and/or Bad Teams, such as in our leading angle. We are not using those terms subjectively in those contexts, but rather, Good Teams are strictly defined as teams that have won at least 10 of their last 16 games and Bad Teams are defined as teams that have lost at least 10 of their last 16 games.
It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs, and this angle also adds in the motivation off wanting to bounce back after a loss. This angle is an amazing 17-4 ATS so far in 2012! Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, and Philly +7.5 to 8.
The very definition of being contrarian is betting on teams that the general public wants no part of, and this angle combines three things that the public likes to avoid, as these are teams that are generally bad to begin with, they are on losing streaks and they are on the road. And yet, check out this winning % over a very nice-sized sampling. Qualifiers: Detroit +7, 7.5 to 8 and Tennessee +5 to 6 (buy to 7 if +6).
Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (170-108-5, 61.2% ATS): The logic behind this angle is the same as the previous angle with two exceptions, as it does not matter if the team playing its second straight road game won or lost its previous game, and also it is restricted to conference games only as now facing a familiar foe lessens the travel effect since the team usually knows how to attack that foe and what to expect on defense. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 13. Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, Philadelphia +7.5 to 8 and Houston +3.5 to 4 (Monday).
Angle #4 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (61-42-3, 59.2% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle pushed its only play in Week 13. Qualifier: Houston +3.5 to 4 at New England (Monday).
Angle #5 - Play on any Bad Team on the road that was an underdog in each of its last four games (101-65-2, 60.8% ATS): Playing this angle may take some courage as it often points you to the dregs of the league, and on the road no less! But that is precisely the point as these teams often offer great value with no novice bettors wanting any part of them, as evidenced by the excellent winning % over a nice sampling. This angle split 1-1 in Week 13. Qualifier: Kansas City +7.5 to 8.
McTrendz plays NO, Phi, Det and Ariz.
Double angles for this week Ariz, NO, Philly and Hou. (Probably a parlay there and extra unit on singles especially if you consider Ariz, NO and Philly are McTrendz plays as well!!!)
Believe it or not, Dallas Cryboys +4 to 5 becomes a GM4 of 4 chase play in a system I sometimes play but don't post as they are 4 game chases. (I will hold my nose and go with it as I HATE the Cowboys, but small play and hope Cincy wins by 3). It is supposed to be a strong play, so 2 units max for me. I RARELY bet on the Cowboys, and FOR THE LOVE OF GOD I hate that they are in a system that rarely loses 4 game chase!
Other plays I like Tenn +6 or buy to 7 if one point buy. Jets -2 GM1 of 2 buy down from 3 to at least -2.5.
Trends are now 26-14-1, 65.0 percent ATS over the last four weeks. As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. Now, two of the angles we had last week have no qualifying plays in Week 14, so we kick thing off with two angles that we have been successful with in the past but have had several weeks off, one of which is 17-4 ATS this season!
All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Also, you will occasionally see angles that refer to Good Teams and/or Bad Teams, such as in our leading angle. We are not using those terms subjectively in those contexts, but rather, Good Teams are strictly defined as teams that have won at least 10 of their last 16 games and Bad Teams are defined as teams that have lost at least 10 of their last 16 games.
Angle #1 - Play on any road underdog coming off of a road loss (138-73-5, 65.4% ATS): It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs, and this angle also adds in the motivation off wanting to bounce back after a loss. This angle is an amazing 17-4 ATS so far in 2012! Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, and Philly +7.5 to 8.
Angle #2 - Play on any Bad Team in conference road games off of two losses (116-83-4, 58.3% ATS): The very definition of being contrarian is betting on teams that the general public wants no part of, and this angle combines three things that the public likes to avoid, as these are teams that are generally bad to begin with, they are on losing streaks and they are on the road. And yet, check out this winning % over a very nice-sized sampling. Qualifiers: Detroit +7, 7.5 to 8 and Tennessee +5 to 6 (buy to 7 if +6).
Angle #3 - Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (170-108-5, 61.2% ATS): The logic behind this angle is the same as the previous angle with two exceptions, as it does not matter if the team playing its second straight road game won or lost its previous game, and also it is restricted to conference games only as now facing a familiar foe lessens the travel effect since the team usually knows how to attack that foe and what to expect on defense. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 13. Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, Philadelphia +7.5 to 8 and Houston +3.5 to 4 (Monday).
Angle #4 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (61-42-3, 59.2% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle pushed its only play in Week 13. Qualifier: Houston +3.5 to 4 at New England (Monday).
Angle #5 - Play on any Bad Team on the road that was an underdog in each of its last four games (101-65-2, 60.8% ATS): Playing this angle may take some courage as it often points you to the dregs of the league, and on the road no less! But that is precisely the point as these teams often offer great value with no novice bettors wanting any part of them, as evidenced by the excellent winning % over a nice sampling. This angle split 1-1 in Week 13. Qualifier: Kansas City +7.5 to 8.
McTrendz plays NO, Phi, Det and Ariz.
Double angles for this week Ariz, NO, Philly and Hou. (Probably a parlay there and extra unit on singles especially if you consider Ariz, NO and Philly are McTrendz plays as well!!!)
Believe it or not, Dallas Cryboys +4 to 5 becomes a GM4 of 4 chase play in a system I sometimes play but don't post as they are 4 game chases. (I will hold my nose and go with it as I HATE the Cowboys, but small play and hope Cincy wins by 3). It is supposed to be a strong play, so 2 units max for me. I RARELY bet on the Cowboys, and FOR THE LOVE OF GOD I hate that they are in a system that rarely loses 4 game chase!
Other plays I like Tenn +6 or buy to 7 if one point buy. Jets -2 GM1 of 2 buy down from 3 to at least -2.5.
Trends are now 26-14-1, 65.0 percent ATS over the last four weeks. As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. Now, two of the angles we had last week have no qualifying plays in Week 14, so we kick thing off with two angles that we have been successful with in the past but have had several weeks off, one of which is 17-4 ATS this season!
All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Also, you will occasionally see angles that refer to Good Teams and/or Bad Teams, such as in our leading angle. We are not using those terms subjectively in those contexts, but rather, Good Teams are strictly defined as teams that have won at least 10 of their last 16 games and Bad Teams are defined as teams that have lost at least 10 of their last 16 games.
Angle #1 - Play on any road underdog coming off of a road loss (138-73-5, 65.4% ATS): It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs, and this angle also adds in the motivation off wanting to bounce back after a loss. This angle is an amazing 17-4 ATS so far in 2012! Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, and Philly +7.5 to 8.
Angle #2 - Play on any Bad Team in conference road games off of two losses (116-83-4, 58.3% ATS): The very definition of being contrarian is betting on teams that the general public wants no part of, and this angle combines three things that the public likes to avoid, as these are teams that are generally bad to begin with, they are on losing streaks and they are on the road. And yet, check out this winning % over a very nice-sized sampling. Qualifiers: Detroit +7, 7.5 to 8 and Tennessee +5 to 6 (buy to 7 if +6).
Angle #3 - Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (170-108-5, 61.2% ATS): The logic behind this angle is the same as the previous angle with two exceptions, as it does not matter if the team playing its second straight road game won or lost its previous game, and also it is restricted to conference games only as now facing a familiar foe lessens the travel effect since the team usually knows how to attack that foe and what to expect on defense. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 13. Qualifiers: Arizona +10.5 to 11, New Orleans +5 to 6, Philadelphia +7.5 to 8 and Houston +3.5 to 4 (Monday).
Angle #4 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (61-42-3, 59.2% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle pushed its only play in Week 13. Qualifier: Houston +3.5 to 4 at New England (Monday).
Angle #5 - Play on any Bad Team on the road that was an underdog in each of its last four games (101-65-2, 60.8% ATS): Playing this angle may take some courage as it often points you to the dregs of the league, and on the road no less! But that is precisely the point as these teams often offer great value with no novice bettors wanting any part of them, as evidenced by the excellent winning % over a nice sampling. This angle split 1-1 in Week 13. Qualifier: Kansas City +7.5 to 8.
McTrendz plays NO, Phi, Det and Ariz.
Double angles for this week Ariz, NO, Philly and Hou. (Probably a parlay there and extra unit on singles especially if you consider Ariz, NO and Philly are McTrendz plays as well!!!)
Believe it or not, Dallas Cryboys +4 to 5 becomes a GM4 of 4 chase play in a system I sometimes play but don't post as they are 4 game chases. (I will hold my nose and go with it as I HATE the Cowboys, but small play and hope Cincy wins by 3). It is supposed to be a strong play, so 2 units max for me. I RARELY bet on the Cowboys, and FOR THE LOVE OF GOD I hate that they are in a system that rarely loses 4 game chase!
Other plays I like Tenn +6 or buy to 7 if one point buy. Jets -2 GM1 of 2 buy down from 3 to at least -2.5.
I live in the west as you know and every time I wake up the first morning after returning from back east, I'm foggy and I also crash a few hours earlier the first night...but nothing happens when I get there...this is definitely a something to look into in NBA, NHL and MLB...also, do home teams then cover hard in game 2?
NFL thoughts...the league is so close that the only value is with Angle's type trends...if you ask yourself why, you many times have a winner on that team...
Ex: No way SD stays close today, right? Out of the playoffs, coach rumored to be fired and players being asked about it. Pitt pulls huge win on road with QB older than us...well, you watch them suck it up and cover while Pitt takes the foot off the brakes today...and I am a Charger fan and hate the owner for how he's wasted more talent than Dusty Baker...
I live in the west as you know and every time I wake up the first morning after returning from back east, I'm foggy and I also crash a few hours earlier the first night...but nothing happens when I get there...this is definitely a something to look into in NBA, NHL and MLB...also, do home teams then cover hard in game 2?
NFL thoughts...the league is so close that the only value is with Angle's type trends...if you ask yourself why, you many times have a winner on that team...
Ex: No way SD stays close today, right? Out of the playoffs, coach rumored to be fired and players being asked about it. Pitt pulls huge win on road with QB older than us...well, you watch them suck it up and cover while Pitt takes the foot off the brakes today...and I am a Charger fan and hate the owner for how he's wasted more talent than Dusty Baker...
Sunday beatdown games:
LAKERS
LAKERS/ JAZZ OVER
TORONTO (Early game )
CLIPPERS/TOTONTO OVER
All game 1's, one unit each. Lakers coming HOME from mini road trip, so be careful...
Sunday beatdown games:
LAKERS
LAKERS/ JAZZ OVER
TORONTO (Early game )
CLIPPERS/TOTONTO OVER
All game 1's, one unit each. Lakers coming HOME from mini road trip, so be careful...
Hoya, I was all over Sacramento, ML, +points, Under and Parlayed them all. Thanks for ponting that game out, even though it was on my SS!
San Antonio clobbered Chatlotte last night by 32 points.
SS updated. Page 2 detailing jet lag fade...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEpsNzVuQm40N2hwVkxKZlp5Vl9yOVE
Hoya, I was all over Sacramento, ML, +points, Under and Parlayed them all. Thanks for ponting that game out, even though it was on my SS!
San Antonio clobbered Chatlotte last night by 32 points.
SS updated. Page 2 detailing jet lag fade...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArtvW2coXCHsdEpsNzVuQm40N2hwVkxKZlp5Vl9yOVE

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.