All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

Sunday Afternoon - MLB

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3489
Posts: 48
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2011
Posts: 473
Posted: #26
Thanks again Sir, great stuff!  Appreciate the write-ups, don't let the haters get to you!  You are one of the most generous people on here.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 888
Posted: #27
Great stuff as usual! Any thoughts nba tonight? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by whisperman:

Great stuff as usual! Any thoughts nba tonight? 

I'll post the series breakdowns in a little while.  I think the Spurs/Thunder series will go much like the Mavericks/Thunder series just in reverse for OKC.  They'll be able to hang in the games with a higher FTR rate and good outside shooting, but ultimately San Antonio will be too much to overcome.  I like the Spurs to win in 5-6 games.  I think they win tonight, not sure if they cover yet, still crunching numbers.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by eyemtlaw:

Sheets look great with highlights. 

I think so too.  I'll keep it that way for future posts.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 57577
Posted: #30
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #31
Nice second inning for the Rangers.  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9543
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:

Would these sheets be better if I color coordinated the rankings for pitchers (i.e. top 30 rank = green number ; bottom 30 rank = red number)?  I could do the same for hitting ranks for top 5 and bottom 5 ranked teams.

Might make it easier to see the key data points in the match-up.  What do you all think?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #33
1-0 to start the day with the Giants winning 3-2.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1782
Posted: #34
Good stuff!!!! Tonight's seems like your type of game what you thinking????
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by hotshots23:

Good stuff!!!! Tonight's seems like your type of game what you thinking????

Strong lean to the Nats.. very likely that I play them.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1782
Posted: #36
Gio is a beast and the Nats have been hitting everything in sight as of late.  Very good.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #37
In case you missed it from earlier in the thread, here's the breakdown of the Sunday Night game.  The SABRmetrics definitely favor the Nationals.


5/27 - WAS@ATL.pdf
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 1782
Posted: #38
I'm not sure what the deal but, it won't let me read it.  The page moves down after I open it.  Not sure what the deal is
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by hotshots23:

I'm not sure what the deal but, it won't let me read it.  The page moves down after I open it.  Not sure what the deal is

It's hosted on google docs.  The header should still be there even if the page scrolls down.  See if you can download it.  It's just a .pdf file.  Can't harm anything.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #40
1:05 EST - San Francisco Giants (-110)  
3:05 EST - Texas Rangers -1 (-141)  

Did the numbers speak loud enough for all you naysayers?  I don't hear anybody talking shit today?  Leaning on Washington tonight.


'11-12 MLB:  5-2 (71.4%)  +2.43u
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 24212
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:

1:05 EST - San Francisco Giants (-110)  
3:05 EST - Texas Rangers -1 (-141)  

Did the numbers speak loud enough for all you naysayers?  I don't hear anybody talking shit today?  Leaning on Washington tonight.


'11-12 MLB:  5-2 (71.4%)  +2.43u

 Talking shit after winning with a -200

Your writeups don't mean shit to the results of the games

That's all i'm saying.

There is no 100% cappers in the world
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

 Talking shit after winning with a -200

Your writeups don't mean shit to the results of the games

That's all i'm saying.


Yes.  They do.  My SABRmetric analysis of baseball match-ups has resulted in a 111-71 (61.0%) for 43.26 units lifetime posted record on covers.  Who gives a shit what the odds on my wagers are (by the way, -141 on the -1 line is not the same as -200 on the moneyline smartass).  Also, do the math on my record to units relationship - with my success on 2-unit wagers, my average baseball wager was actually at +108 odds.  My record and units speak for themselves.  As do my write-ups.  You think my analysis is just dumb luck?  Fuck no.  I'm good at this shit.  And I've proven so over a sample size of 182 MLB wagers over 15 months.  This will be the last time I respond to your nonsense.  Good luck, I hope you continue to have success this season.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 24212
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:


Yes.  They do.  My SABRmetric analysis of baseball match-ups has resulted in a 111-71 (61.0%) for 43.26 units lifetime posted record on covers.  Who gives a shit what the odds on my wagers are (by the way, -141 on the -1 line is not the same as -200 on the moneyline smartass).  Also, do the math on my record to units relationship - with my success on 2-unit wagers, my average baseball wager was actually at +108 odds.  My record and units speak for themselves.  As do my write-ups.  You think my analysis is just dumb luck?  Fuck no.  I'm good at this shit.  And I've proven so over a sample size of 182 MLB wagers over 15 months.  This will be the last time I respond to your nonsense.  Good luck, I hope you continue to have success this season.

Sabremetrics are promoted by the sportsbooks for a reason.GL

There is no 100% cappers in the world
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 681
Posted: #44

Nice win today si1ly!!! Great comeback. Ignore the haters even me when I say "this one hurt". Keep the rolling in!!!

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by KingScorpio:

Sabremetrics are promoted by the sportsbooks for a reason.GL



Geezus.  Give me a break....


That is about the dumbest thing you've ever said, man.  Come on.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 2357
Posted: #46
3:05 EST - Texas Rangers -1 (-141)  How do es one get a -141 -1 run line? is it  a combo of tradional 1.5 RL and ML?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by drum67:

3:05 EST - Texas Rangers -1 (-141)  How do es one get a -141 -1 run line? is it  a combo of tradional 1.5 RL and ML?


YES.    
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 2357
Posted: #48
All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.