All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

My limits changed to 10 bucks...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3775
Posts: 96
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #51

Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:



you said NO BOOK would do that. Not let's see about the majority or anything. You said NO BOOK. Also 10 difference known books? hahahahahaha Also you know what you typed in that thread. And then you said if you came back and responded in that thread you would pay me $10,000 and then you came back when was fired and responded. I think I might need to check with my lawyer about if there is anything I can do on that. hmmmmm

Yes NO NO NO NO NO NO BOOK would do that. Just to let you know, you cant consider your neighbor as a "book" No book would ever limit a wager to $10. NO BOOK am I fucken STUTTTTTERRRRING?

You know your childish when you laugh over ONE grammer mistake. Ok I said differnce? Why is that so funny? Grow up you brain dead turd.

What the fuck are you talking about?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by Jason316:

 

WRONG

 

i cashed out 7k with 5dimes 3 weeks ago with no problems...PLUS IT WAS FREE




Notice how I said EXCEPT 5 DIMES...   Learn to read
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #53

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Do you wanna bet on me on THIS one? We'll go on conference call and call up the sportsbook that did this and you can see for yourself. Wanna lay me 5-1 on that one?

And are you seriously not willing to admit you said that? You obviously know your threads were deleted and that I'd never find them. But you seriously aren't willing to admit you said that? Seriously? Boy you are making me look better and better with each new post you make. Anyone on the baseball forum who was around during the LeBron decision knows what you said. Chances are though, not many people on this forum saw it. Oh well, you know what you said and if it makes you feel better, lying to an internet forum to save ANY last shred of credibility you may have on here, so be it.

Why the fuck would I bet you that. You might just know the manager. You know a real book would never limit their players to $10. Believe me, you aint no where near a big bettor, so don't act like the book(s) are scared of you.

Show me PROOF that I said Lebron would go to the Knicks. Prove me wrong you retarded monkey

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #54

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:




Notice how I said EXCEPT 5 DIMES...   Learn to read

Looks like your back from REHAB. hahahahaha what a LOSER YOU ARE

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by Jason316:

 

WRONG

 

i cashed out 7k with 5dimes 3 weeks ago with no problems...PLUS IT WAS FREE




you may think you know everything, which is what you do in everyone's thread..  I said 5 dimes, pinnacle, or LOCAl book...  And heres a flashing light bulb for you since you like them
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

Why the fuck would I bet you that. You might just know the manager. You know a real book would never limit their players to $10. Believe me, you aint no where near a big bettor, so don't act like the book(s) are scared of you.

Show me PROOF that I said Lebron would go to the Knicks. Prove me wrong you retarded monkey



Your threads were deleted. You and I both know you were trying to get me to bet you in escrow (as Kapono said) If you want to deny it to save face go right ahead, but me and you both know what you said. Like I said earlier, if you need to lie about it to save face then be my guest. But it is absolutely astonishing that you can't even admit you said it.

You obviously know your threads were deleted and that I'd have no trace of it. But I guess me and Kapono are both making it up. Right? We know you said it, and YOU know you said it. But keep lying if it makes you feel better.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #57
And I don't know how you guys even waste your time with SuperiorInsight, the guy has been a joke since he typed his first word on this forum.. just ignore him
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 5131
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:




Notice how I said EXCEPT 5 DIMES...   Learn to read

 

learn how to write...u never said "EXCEPT"...it was hard to understand what u were trying to say

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:

That's because ONLINE BOOKS suck, they are a joke...  They trap amateurs with sign on bonus'... At any moment you get an email saying your new limit.... Only can cash out 3k at a time bl a bla bla... 5 Dimes or Pinnacle ...other than that local book

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #59

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:

And I don't know how you guys even waste your time with SuperiorInsight, the guy has been a joke since he typed his first word on this forum.. just ignore him

Don't hate because I clearly STUMPED you on Colts ML bet. I straight owned you. You keep saying how stupid/dumb/idiot bet I made for betting the Colts ML. I made up a open challenge to tell me I'm wrong and you had no expliantion

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by Jason316:

 

learn how to write...u never said "EXCEPT"...it was hard to understand what u were trying to say

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:

That's because ONLINE BOOKS suck, they are a joke...  They trap amateurs with sign on bonus'... At any moment you get an email saying your new limit.... Only can cash out 3k at a time bl a bla bla... 5 Dimes or Pinnacle ...other than that local book




Pretty self-explanatory

if you weren't so quick to put someone down you would have been able to comprehend the sentence
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #61

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:

And I don't know how you guys even waste your time with SuperiorInsight, the guy has been a joke since he typed his first word on this forum.. just ignore him

I will tell you this time and time again. You have yet to avoid the point here and make a valid arugment for yourself. For all you folks who question my bet. I beg and I am offically calling out anybody out there to prove me wrong. Anyone and everyone who think this is a bad beat. I beg please show me i'm wrong.

If I hit my ML (anywhere from -120 to -340) favorite wagers at a 77% rate. How is betting the Colts ML for -340 a bad bet? Just because I might possibly lose this bet, all you folks think it's a bad bet? What about all the other 77% of the winners I have? Why did for some odd reason you guys dont consider that as well. You folks seriously need to get your head out of gutters and see the picture.

I'd like to hear ONE REAL LEGIT ANSWER to say I'm wrong about what I just stated. I beg all you folks who think my bet is dumb to tell me otherwise. Thank you and this case is closed.

STAIGHT OWNED URISS

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 13715
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

I will tell you this time and time again. You have yet to avoid the point here and make a valid arugment for yourself. For all you folks who question my bet. I beg and I am offically calling out anybody out there to prove me wrong. Anyone and everyone who think this is a bad beat. I beg please show me i'm wrong.

If I hit my ML (anywhere from -120 to -340) favorite wagers at a 77% rate. How is betting the Colts ML for -340 a bad bet? Just because I might possibly lose this bet, all you folks think it's a bad bet? What about all the other 77% of the winners I have? Why did for some odd reason you guys dont consider that as well. You folks seriously need to get your head out of gutters and see the picture.

I'd like to hear ONE REAL LEGIT ANSWER to say I'm wrong about what I just stated. I beg all you folks who think my bet is dumb to tell me otherwise. Thank you and this case is closed.

STAIGHT OWNED URISS



At -340 even if you hit at 75%... you are losing money 40 cents to the dollar to be exact
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 5131
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:




Pretty self-explanatory

if you weren't so quick to put someone down you would have been able to comprehend the sentence

 

Fine

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #64

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Your threads were deleted. You and I both know you were trying to get me to bet you in escrow (as Kapono said) If you want to deny it to save face go right ahead, but me and you both know what you said. Like I said earlier, if you need to lie about it to save face then be my guest. But it is absolutely astonishing that you can't even admit you said it.

You obviously know your threads were deleted and that I'd have no trace of it. But I guess me and Kapono are both making it up. Right? We know you said it, and YOU know you said it. But keep lying if it makes you feel better.

Lets see here, please I ask just for one minute of STAIGHT FOCUS.

Think about it, your claiming I said Lebron is going to the Knicks. Yet when I ask you when/where I said that, you have NO PROOF I SAID THAT.

Think about it, for a second here. By the looks for it, it appears I'm owning you in this disscussion. Don't you think?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 5131
Posted: #65

anybody that bets anything over -200 is an idiot

cut down the juice & take -1

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #66

Quote Originally Posted by URISS2302:



At -340 even if you hit at 75%... you are losing money 40 cents to the dollar to be exact

If I hit my ML (anywhere from -120 to -340) favorite wagers at a 77% rate. How is betting the Colts ML for -340 a bad bet? Just because I might possibly lose this bet, all you folks think it's a bad bet? What about all the other 77% of the winners I have? Why did for some odd reason you guys dont consider that as well. You folks seriously need to get your head out of gutters and see the picture.

My ML wagers anywhere from (-120 to -340) When did I say all my wagers are -340. Your cleary owned here uriss.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

Lets see here, please I ask just for one minute of STAIGHT FOCUS.

Think about it, your claiming I said Lebron is going to the Knicks. Yet when I ask you when/where I said that, you have NO PROOF I SAID THAT.

Think about it, for a second here. By the looks for it, it appears I'm owning you in this disscussion. Don't you think?



This is so laughable it's ridiculous. Me and Kap BOTH claim you were willing to give me 5-1 on LeBron not going to the Knicks. A bet you wanted us to make in escrow. Do you think we are MAKING THIS STORY UP OUT OF THIN AIR? Like I said, your threads were deleted. You have no threads from July 8-10th which is when we had that discussion. I want you to answer a very simple question...

Did you comment in the nba forum AT ALL on where LeBron was going to go days before the announcement? Yes, or no? When you answer no, I will continue to do these...


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 35430
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

Lets see here, please I ask just for one minute of STAIGHT FOCUS.

Think about it, your claiming I said Lebron is going to the Knicks. Yet when I ask you when/where I said that, you have NO PROOF I SAID THAT.

Think about it, for a second here. By the looks for it, it appears I'm owning you in this disscussion. Don't you think?



I'd be willing to testify under oath in a court of law that you you wanted rangerz to wire money into an escrow account and you would give him 5-1 odds that LeBron was going to the Knicks. Chances are the thread was boxed and/or deleted. That being said, I remember it quite clearly, and I know you do too.  But its clear you just like to argue (not very well, I must say).

If anyone is "owning" anyone in here, it sure as hell isn't you owning rangerz. He at least has one person who will vouch for his version of the events. Where's your person? (Hint: Remember to log into one of your other accounts before you post to support your story, wouldn't want to screw that one up, ok?)
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by Jason316:

anybody that bets anything over -200 is an idiot

cut down the juice & take -1



I am NOT siding with Superior here, but this is a ridiculous statement on all fronts.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 5131
Posted: #70

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



I am NOT siding with Superior here, but this is a ridiculous statement on all fronts.


 

how so?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by Jason316:

 

how so?



Because if there is a -200 bet that you feel has a 75% chance of winning, the -200 IS a good bet. By your claim that ANY bet over -200 is a bad bet, you should be taking the +200 EVERY TIME and making money. I am not advising people to lay heavy juice on a daily basis. But doing it once in a while on a bet you feel confident in makes sense.

For example - last year Peyton was -200 to win MVP at my book in week 16. I felt like he had AT LEAST an 80% chance of winning. An 80% chance of winning equates to a -400 moneyline. Therefore, the -200 had a ton of value in my eyes. I don't lay -200 on a game, but in situations like this one it made a ton of sense.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:



I'd be willing to testify under oath in a court of law that you you wanted rangerz to wire money into an escrow account and you would give him 5-1 odds that LeBron was going to the Knicks. Chances are the thread was boxed and/or deleted. That being said, I remember it quite clearly, and I know you do too.  But its clear you just like to argue (not very well, I must say).

If anyone is "owning" anyone in here, it sure as hell isn't you owning rangerz. He at least has one person who will vouch for his version of the events. Where's your person? (Hint: Remember to log into one of your other accounts before you post to support your story, wouldn't want to screw that one up, ok?)




How about a lie detector test?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5365
Posted: #73

Dear Jason,

We are tired of you a$$ raping our book.  I would appreciate it if you would stop winning so much money on ingame bets and halftime props.  Please limit your bets to $10 a wager or there will be a penalty.  Most likely limiting all your bets to a max of $5 per wager and parlay amounts to 2 teamers.

Sincerely,

The Indian mother F**ck** in charge of managing your account

 

 

 

 

I guess that letter would be more appropriate

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3045
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

If I hit my ML (anywhere from -120 to -340) favorite wagers at a 77% rate. How is betting the Colts ML for -340 a bad bet? Just because I might possibly lose this bet, all you folks think it's a bad bet? What about all the other 77% of the winners I have? Why did for some odd reason you guys dont consider that as well. You folks seriously need to get your head out of gutters and see the picture.

My ML wagers anywhere from (-120 to -340) When did I say all my wagers are -340. Your cleary owned here uriss.

I can see why your account never gets limited

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1506
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



This is so laughable it's ridiculous. Me and Kap BOTH claim you were willing to give me 5-1 on LeBron not going to the Knicks. A bet you wanted us to make in escrow. Do you think we are MAKING THIS STORY UP OUT OF THIN AIR? Like I said, your threads were deleted. You have no threads from July 8-10th which is when we had that discussion. I want you to answer a very simple question...

Did you comment in the nba forum AT ALL on where LeBron was going to go days before the announcement? Yes, or no? When you answer no, I will continue to do these...


Yeah I commented in the NBA fourm during that time. Your just making up a good old failry tale. Untill you have evidence do back you up, I'm OBV winning this disscussion.

All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.