W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:
fade system
8-4 sides 140s system 4-3
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
I guess it is profitable with a chasing system as we add a unit for every lost on the next game.
ah, too complicated. This is a simple mickey mouse system that is not proven by any means because it is fruity looking.
Everything you say is true. W-L means nothing. To be profitable, one must not straight bet due to odds of such games being different. Goal is to lose small but when win, win the big money ball.
What has been happening is that these teams with the worst records in the league are pulling an upset. Bad luck for square betters who loves to chalk it up. That's me. ha
X_____________________________
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:
W-L alone may not provide you an accurate measure of success with these systems. As you are playing the big-chalk favorites, the actual return on say, a 5-2 run, wll still likely be a slight loser, money wise. Perhaps focus on units won/lost instead, to get a better idea of which systems are paying dividends and which aren't.
Good luck
I guess it is profitable with a chasing system as we add a unit for every lost on the next game.
ah, too complicated. This is a simple mickey mouse system that is not proven by any means because it is fruity looking.
Everything you say is true. W-L means nothing. To be profitable, one must not straight bet due to odds of such games being different. Goal is to lose small but when win, win the big money ball.
What has been happening is that these teams with the worst records in the league are pulling an upset. Bad luck for square betters who loves to chalk it up. That's me. ha