Posted:
#476
-2.31, -18.21
Rangers 105 (7x)
Angels -139 (7x)
Reds -107 (3x)
Rangers 105 (7x)
Angels -139 (7x)
Reds -107 (3x)
0
MLB picks using Monte Carlo simulation
Posted:
#486
I love the data and the analysis - thank you. I'm with ya on the cardinals and white sox. I agree with ya that on paper - redsox, dodgers, and nationals should win. Not so sure about the braves. I'll ask and will understand if you don't want to answer - In your system - how much credit do you give hitters?
0
Posted:
#493
so im guessing you love the whitesox here with Sale on the mound. the only thing that sort of scares me is KC's play as of late particularly the month of August. They been playing some really tough games and coming put with some W's in unforeseen fashion. they are batting .287 of sale in about a 100ABs....3 hrs 22ks 7rbis 6 bb 31 hits
0
Posted:
#494
nothing to scary considering sale is a FUCKING BEAST !!!
hope this is not one of those games where vegas is going to steal our cash....
i read somewhere that during august in mlb over the past season, the high juice favs are hitting at a pretty good rate, 60% or so (cant remember the exact stat tho)
im liking det chw zona and laa
what are your thoughts on those bro !!!
what are your thoughts on those bro !!!
0
Posted:
#497
-25.62, -49.47
We are approaching a stop. I have gained 100 units on average per year. I will not lose more than 50 in one year. This is to prevent a new trend from fully bankrupting the process. A losing day today of a little over 0.5 units triggers a stop for the year.
Rangers -167 (7x)
Reds 135 (5x)
Pirates -101 (5x)
We are approaching a stop. I have gained 100 units on average per year. I will not lose more than 50 in one year. This is to prevent a new trend from fully bankrupting the process. A losing day today of a little over 0.5 units triggers a stop for the year.
Rangers -167 (7x)
Reds 135 (5x)
Pirates -101 (5x)
0
Hot Forum Topics
