no cg but Lee is really dialing in as of late...
![]()
no cg but Lee is really dialing in as of late...
![]()
Wow - great info - so just to understand you are saying that based on historical data that you have captured - betting yes is an inherently PE bet?
I would be very interested in hearing more about this - this bet is totally off of my radar. Totally. Is yes usually a favorite or underdog - do you know the average line of this bet?
Thanks
![]()
Yes that's exactly right Vanzack. A given game's line is obviously highly correlated with the full game's total. So I've stratified my 1st inning results by posted O/U and calculated historical true MLs. Over 99% of the time, the NO line is a huge negative expectation bet, making the only options YES or no play. There are generally 3-5 overlays a day of varying amounts on the YES.
Wow - great info - so just to understand you are saying that based on historical data that you have captured - betting yes is an inherently PE bet?
I would be very interested in hearing more about this - this bet is totally off of my radar. Totally. Is yes usually a favorite or underdog - do you know the average line of this bet?
Thanks
![]()
Yes that's exactly right Vanzack. A given game's line is obviously highly correlated with the full game's total. So I've stratified my 1st inning results by posted O/U and calculated historical true MLs. Over 99% of the time, the NO line is a huge negative expectation bet, making the only options YES or no play. There are generally 3-5 overlays a day of varying amounts on the YES.
Yes that's exactly right Vanzack. A given game's line is obviously highly correlated with the full game's total. So I've stratified my 1st inning results by posted O/U and calculated historical true MLs. Over 99% of the time, the NO line is a huge negative expectation bet, making the only options YES or no play. There are generally 3-5 overlays a day of varying amounts on the YES.
So you are making a profit doing this?
What is the limit on this bet? Where do you find this bet?
Thanks for answering the questions- Im going to check this out for sure.
![]()
Yes that's exactly right Vanzack. A given game's line is obviously highly correlated with the full game's total. So I've stratified my 1st inning results by posted O/U and calculated historical true MLs. Over 99% of the time, the NO line is a huge negative expectation bet, making the only options YES or no play. There are generally 3-5 overlays a day of varying amounts on the YES.
So you are making a profit doing this?
What is the limit on this bet? Where do you find this bet?
Thanks for answering the questions- Im going to check this out for sure.
![]()
That's what I thought when I got it a couple weeks ago but surprisingly you're the first one to say anything. I think a lot of people are offended. ![]()
That's what I thought when I got it a couple weeks ago but surprisingly you're the first one to say anything. I think a lot of people are offended. ![]()
it was meant by....
having to face C lee...it wont hep the cubbies much![]()
llove the tribe at this price!
it was meant by....
having to face C lee...it wont hep the cubbies much![]()
llove the tribe at this price!
So you are making a profit doing this?
What is the limit on this bet? Where do you find this bet?
Thanks for answering the questions- Im going to check this out for sure.
![]()
Since Neteller went away, my betting activity is almost non-existent. 2006 was my peak running this prop and I bet almost 1300 games that season and increased my bankroll 669% by varying my unit sizes so that my bankroll was always 50 units, never betting more than 1.5 units on a given game. With Neteller, I had 8 books in play and easily moved from one to the other when I saw a bad line or even a middle op when the squares bet the NO too much. Now it's harder unless you have large amounts in each out.
So you are making a profit doing this?
What is the limit on this bet? Where do you find this bet?
Thanks for answering the questions- Im going to check this out for sure.
![]()
Since Neteller went away, my betting activity is almost non-existent. 2006 was my peak running this prop and I bet almost 1300 games that season and increased my bankroll 669% by varying my unit sizes so that my bankroll was always 50 units, never betting more than 1.5 units on a given game. With Neteller, I had 8 books in play and easily moved from one to the other when I saw a bad line or even a middle op when the squares bet the NO too much. Now it's harder unless you have large amounts in each out.
Since Neteller went away, my betting activity is almost non-existent. 2006 was my peak running this prop and I bet almost 1300 games that season and increased my bankroll 669% by varying my unit sizes so that my bankroll was always 50 units, never betting more than 1.5 units on a given game. With Neteller, I had 8 books in play and easily moved from one to the other when I saw a bad line or even a middle op when the squares bet the NO too much. Now it's harder unless you have large amounts in each out.
I hear you with that one. My whole strategy changed for the year after Neteller went away. I have an arrangement now that takes care of things - but I dont think the books I am at have this prop.
Thanks for the heads up. Im going to do some research.
![]()
Since Neteller went away, my betting activity is almost non-existent. 2006 was my peak running this prop and I bet almost 1300 games that season and increased my bankroll 669% by varying my unit sizes so that my bankroll was always 50 units, never betting more than 1.5 units on a given game. With Neteller, I had 8 books in play and easily moved from one to the other when I saw a bad line or even a middle op when the squares bet the NO too much. Now it's harder unless you have large amounts in each out.
I hear you with that one. My whole strategy changed for the year after Neteller went away. I have an arrangement now that takes care of things - but I dont think the books I am at have this prop.
Thanks for the heads up. Im going to do some research.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.