All Forums | MLB Betting Forum

GiLz Thread'ers ((Mon. 8/29))

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5924
Posts: 105
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4929
Posted: #51

On the Rockies also... let's cash it, Gil.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 19355
Posted: #52
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:

  TODAY$ PLAY$      (Mon. 8/29)


  Royals ML @ +162  [4U/$100]
  Royals ALT RL @ +230  [4U/$100]
  Tigers/Royals *OVER 8.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]



WHY?  I like the Royals today...

 

First off, I love these plays.  My confidence level is high today after crunching this game for most of the morning  -  all 3 plays, and I hope to pick up the "trifecta" here with the ML, ALT RL, & *OVER*. I see Sad Max's struggles continuing, 4-Scherzer. Hochevar's been pitching alot better this 2nd half then he did the first half. Haven't played an *OVER* -vs- Luke Hochover in a while. I deemed him Luke Hochover during the 1st half as just about every game he pitched in the 1st half was money to hit the OVER.


Scherzer/Hochevar both got rocked their last meeting -vs- Tigers/Royals.

Expecting the same thing today w/beautiful weather @ Comerica Park.


*WARNING*  If you would like to be steered away, rather then tail, then I'll lead you with the fact that a few of the Tigers in the lineup today have had great success in their careers -vs- Hochevar.

 

But that won't steer me away as I'm rollin' with MOJO today and Max's struggles -vs- opposing teams who are no where in the The Top 10 hitting... pretty much lookin' like a gas can out there -vs- below average hitting teams.

I complied these stats while looking over Max's numbers for this year.  Out of his 7 losses on the year, only 1 of those losses came -vs- a top 10 hitting team which was the Red Sox (#2).  Next in-line is the Royals (#12).  He also has a couple ND's as well -vs- teams outside of the Top 10 in hitting.  Here... have a look for yourselves:


#2 = RED SOX (7ER, 7H over 2IP) Loss
#12 = ROYALS (4ER, 6H over 5IP) Loss
#14 = RAYS (2ER, 4H over 5IP) ND/team lost
#16 = INDIANS (5ER, 6H over 6.2IP) ND/team lost
#21 = WHITE SOX (4ER, 14H over 12IP) Loss, Loss
#23 = PIRATES (3ER, 7H over 5.2IP) Loss
#25 = TWINS (7ER, 9H over 6.2IP) ND/team won
#26 = DODGERS (6ER, 9H over 6IP) Loss
#30 = GIANTS (6ER, 6H over 2IP) Loss

44ER / 50IP x 9  =  7.92 ERA


* Max Scherzer's average run support this year is 5.00 RUNS.
* Luke Hochevar's average run support this year is 5.14 RUNS.

 

Let's GO Royals!   

Let's GO Royals! 

Let's GO Royals!

Let's GO Royals! 

Let's GO Royals!  


 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 25135
Posted: #54
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:


WHY?  I like the Royals today...

 

First off, I love these plays.  My confidence level is high today after crunching this game for most of the morning  -  all 3 plays, and I hope to pick up the "trifecta" here with the ML, ALT RL, & *OVER*. I see Sad Max's struggles continuing, 4-Scherzer. Hochevar's been pitching alot better this 2nd half then he did the first half. Haven't played an *OVER* -vs- Luke Hochover in a while. I deemed him Luke Hochover during the 1st half as just about every game he pitched in the 1st half was money to hit the OVER.


Scherzer/Hochevar both got rocked their last meeting -vs- Tigers/Royals.

Expecting the same thing today w/beautiful weather @ Comerica Park.


*WARNING*  If you would like to be steered away, rather then tail, then I'll lead you with the fact that a few of the Tigers in the lineup today have had great success in their careers -vs- Hochevar.

 

But that won't steer me away as I'm rollin' with MOJO today and Max's struggles -vs- opposing teams who are no where in the The Top 10 hitting... pretty much lookin' like a gas can out there -vs- below average hitting teams.

I complied these stats while looking over Max's numbers for this year.  Out of his 7 losses on the year, only 1 of those losses came -vs- a top 10 hitting team which was the Red Sox (#2).  Next in-line is the Royals (#12).  He also has a couple ND's as well -vs- teams outside of the Top 10 in hitting.  Here... have a look for yourselves:


#2 = RED SOX (7ER, 7H over 2IP) Loss
#12 = ROYALS (4ER, 6H over 5IP) Loss
#14 = RAYS (2ER, 4H over 5IP) ND/team lost
#16 = INDIANS (5ER, 6H over 6.2IP) ND/team lost
#21 = WHITE SOX (4ER, 14H over 12IP) Loss, Loss
#23 = PIRATES (3ER, 7H over 5.2IP) Loss
#25 = TWINS (7ER, 9H over 6.2IP) ND/team won
#26 = DODGERS (6ER, 9H over 6IP) Loss
#30 = GIANTS (6ER, 6H over 2IP) Loss

44ER / 50IP x 9  =  7.92 ERA


* Max Scherzer's average run support this year is 5.00 RUNS.
* Luke Hochevar's average run support this year is 5.14 RUNS.

 

Let's GO Royals!   

Let's GO Royals! 

Let's GO Royals!

Let's GO Royals! 

Let's GO Royals!  


 


ADD:


  Tigers *TT OVER 3.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6703
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:


ADD:


  Tigers *TT OVER 3.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]

 

Wouldn't the over 8.5 on the game an automatic bet for you then?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2337
Posted: #57
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 12557
Posted: #58
Kershaw should hold these asswipes down. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

Wouldn't the over 8.5 on the game an automatic bet for you then?


Already on it buddy.  Check post #54  -  in the quote...


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #60

Good Luck GiLmo !! 

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #61
ADD:
 
 
  Parlay (2teamer)  -  1.) Yankees RL  2.) Phillies RL
[4U to win 11.5U]
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #62

||an_blowhorn.gif' border=0>  ****UPDATED****

 

  TODAY$ PLAY$      (Mon. 8/29)


Astros ML @ -130  [8U/$200]
Astros/Pirates *OVER 8* @ -110  [4U/$100]

Rockies ML @ +147  [8U/$200]

Athletics ML @ +115  [8U/$200]

Padres/Dodgers *UNDER 6* @ -120  [4U/$100]

Marlins (GM #1) ML @ +117  [4U/$100]

Rays ML @ +140  [4U/$100]

Royals ML @ +162  [4U/$100]
 Royals ALT RL @ +230  [4U/$100]
 Royals *TT OVER 3.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]
 Tigers/Royals *OVER 8.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]

Mets (GM #2) RL @ +185  [LEAN]
Mets/Marlins *OVER 8* (GM #2) @ -105  [LEAN]

Parlay (2teamer)  -  1.) Yankees RL 2.) Phillies RL
((4U to win 11.5U))
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 239
Posted: #63
Glad you cleared up that it's the Royals TT over 3.5 and not the Tigers. You might check your original post because somebody could be placing the wrong bets. :)
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by GiLmo574:


ADD:


  Tigers *TT OVER 3.5* @ -110  [4U/$100]


DAMNIT!


Tigers TT is OVER 4.5


Royals TT is OVER 3.5


I'm an idiot.  Sorry for putting the TIGERS down, Thread'ers.   

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 17329
Posted: #65
LIKE THAT CARD BRO.......ASS KICKING GIL MOFO LET'S FUCKING GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

TIDE!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #66

Quote Originally Posted by JoshiQ:

Glad you cleared up that it's the Royals TT over 3.5 and not the Tigers. You might check your original post because somebody could be placing the wrong bets. :)


I didn't even notice it.  Thanks for the catch...


Now I know what bunny651 was tellin' me a couple posts up.  LoL. 


  SORRY THREAD'ERS!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 757
Posted: #67
I'm only a Dodgers fan when Kershaw is pitching.

Ethier might not play according to L.A Times paper.

Lets go under ,hopefully Dodgers win 1- 0 .

Good luck Bro ! 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 18166
Posted: #68

Like the avatar Gil.......and that's from a life-long pack fan!

 

GL this year

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 9160
Posted: #69
GL Gil
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #70

DoublePsycho  

Tin-skeeee!  

T-Locks  

BigTone 

Brent 

HotRoute 

Maniak 

BamaBilly 

Bunny 

416bet 

JoshiQ 

Tide 

Fortmax 

Punkassmutha 

 

    GiLz Thread'ers   

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by dimeplayer68:

GL Gil


Thanx, DP.   


 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 17329
Posted: #72
What is this.....all I get is a .....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 239
Posted: #73
You're the only guy on here that I make sure to read his thread. Great job so far on the year. Anything else you like to cap when baseball season is over?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 2267
Posted: #74
BOL today big guy...
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 21804
Posted: #75

Quote Originally Posted by tidefan07:

What is this.....all I get is a .....

 

Whhhhat?!  Damn... I thought my dance showed up?? 

 

                

All Forums | MLB Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.