CHASE THE UNDER/DOG...VOL.33
Posted:
#128
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
That total is from "a capper who sends out emails claiming to always be 12-4 and hitting 80%" on his paid plays but I find that hard to believe, but however the free play from his website is where I get the total from. The free play is hitting very well, as long as it is a baseball total. When football starts I'm afraid we won't see as many MLB totals. I don't like to give out websites not affiliated with covers but I can give you a hint. His name is Joe and some consider him a Wiz.
The total of the day won again yesterday with Dod/Cubs under 6.5, that is now 4 in a row (I upped my wager to 2 units) and since I started tracking it 61-26, 28-8 (and 18-7 as posted here). Not too shabby! I parlayed it yesterday with Yankees under.
Today's total on the website is Oak/Tor under 8, but I see it opened at 7.5 and has dropped to 7, so the official total of the day is Oak/Tor under 7 (which is also a McShady Oakland home under play on his spreadsheet.)
I had another winning day up 6 units but would have been much better if the fricking Braves hadn't stunk and ruined my ATL-1.5 straight bet and killed a 3-teamer with STL-1.5 and Dod-1.5. Luckily I bet them all as straight plays also. How on earth does a winning team lose at home to the Astros? THAT'S HOW BASEBALL GO! (Ranger fans will recognize that as a famous Ron Washington quote).
I may do a jump-in home "non-dog" one game chase with Boston to avoid home sweep but the juice is high and they are not a winning team. I might try the RL-1.5. I'll update later.
Nice wins Semper with Balt and Seattle. Pulling hard for Pitt with the red-hot Burnett today. Let's get that one!
McShady, I missed your series plays but I saw you split. I see you have Angels F5 under. Are you going to play game 3 of the Giants F5 under?
I may make a 3-teamer out of the Oakland under plus the 2 total trends yet to hit with Phillies over and Angels under.
Quote Originally Posted by hi2ak:
for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
for the total of the night on the chc and lad under how do you folks come to that result? is it on the spreadsheet?
That total is from "a capper who sends out emails claiming to always be 12-4 and hitting 80%" on his paid plays but I find that hard to believe, but however the free play from his website is where I get the total from. The free play is hitting very well, as long as it is a baseball total. When football starts I'm afraid we won't see as many MLB totals. I don't like to give out websites not affiliated with covers but I can give you a hint. His name is Joe and some consider him a Wiz.
The total of the day won again yesterday with Dod/Cubs under 6.5, that is now 4 in a row (I upped my wager to 2 units) and since I started tracking it 61-26, 28-8 (and 18-7 as posted here). Not too shabby! I parlayed it yesterday with Yankees under.
Today's total on the website is Oak/Tor under 8, but I see it opened at 7.5 and has dropped to 7, so the official total of the day is Oak/Tor under 7 (which is also a McShady Oakland home under play on his spreadsheet.)
I had another winning day up 6 units but would have been much better if the fricking Braves hadn't stunk and ruined my ATL-1.5 straight bet and killed a 3-teamer with STL-1.5 and Dod-1.5. Luckily I bet them all as straight plays also. How on earth does a winning team lose at home to the Astros? THAT'S HOW BASEBALL GO! (Ranger fans will recognize that as a famous Ron Washington quote).
I may do a jump-in home "non-dog" one game chase with Boston to avoid home sweep but the juice is high and they are not a winning team. I might try the RL-1.5. I'll update later.
Nice wins Semper with Balt and Seattle. Pulling hard for Pitt with the red-hot Burnett today. Let's get that one!
McShady, I missed your series plays but I saw you split. I see you have Angels F5 under. Are you going to play game 3 of the Giants F5 under?
I may make a 3-teamer out of the Oakland under plus the 2 total trends yet to hit with Phillies over and Angels under.
Posted:
#131
Those trends are for informational purposes. They are not "official plays". However, I am playing them both today. It worked last Sunday when there were two left on the sheet.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
Those trends are for informational purposes. They are not "official plays". However, I am playing them both today. It worked last Sunday when there were two left on the sheet.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
Look under the "Series" tab to see McShady's official chase plays. Today's play is Angels under First 5 innings.
Also under the "Home Unders 2H" tab. He is currently chasing Oak, SF and Pitt under when they are at home. Today that would be Oakland under.
Look under the "Phils/Yanks 2H" tab. He is finished going against the Phillies when favored but he always chases a prop bet on "Will there be a score in the 1st inning" YES on every Yankees game.
Posted:
#134
Angel, thanks for explaining the Chase trends! Finally see the tabs and where Mc makes his plays...isn't the Angels under first 5 a play today?
Angel, thanks for explaining the Chase trends! Finally see the tabs and where Mc makes his plays...isn't the Angels under first 5 a play today?
Posted:
#136
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
I meant Angels Full game under in play today? Do you guys always make these plays if they line up on the main spreadsheet?
Thanks
If I understood correctly, that isn't exactly the play. It is a trend but the official play for that is Angels Under F5 5.5.
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
I meant Angels Full game under in play today? Do you guys always make these plays if they line up on the main spreadsheet?
Thanks
If I understood correctly, that isn't exactly the play. It is a trend but the official play for that is Angels Under F5 5.5.
Posted:
#138
Hoyasaxa, those trend are just that trends...you can bet them if you want to, they are for info only.
If you like it, bet it but the official play is Angels First 5 under.
If you like it, bet it but the official play is Angels First 5 under.
Hoyasaxa, those trend are just that trends...you can bet them if you want to, they are for info only.
If you like it, bet it but the official play is Angels First 5 under.
If you like it, bet it but the official play is Angels First 5 under.
Posted:
#139
You could bet them both, I am.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
You could bet them both, I am.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
McShady's official series plays and home under plays are the plays that are listed with the dollars won and lost. The trends are there for people like us to take advantage of. Don't try to make it too complicated.
He may have a series play that goes AGAINST a trend!
Today he likes the First 5 under on the Angels. The trend is out there and apparently he likes the F5 better! He's got a reason and his track record is awesome. The trends are great but some of them have lost before. Keep that in mind.
Posted:
#142
Hoyasaxa, to answer what I believe is confusing you is the Y next to the trend under the column that say IN PLAY.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
I hope this helps.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
I hope this helps.
Hoyasaxa, to answer what I believe is confusing you is the Y next to the trend under the column that say IN PLAY.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
I hope this helps.
That doesn't mean McShady is PLAYING it, what it means is that today the trend hasn't yet been hit in any game of the series and therefore the trend is still "IN PLAY" or waiting to hit. The other series trends have already been won for at least one game and they are not in play.
Today, the Phillies have not yet gone over in any game of their current series and the Angels have not yet gone under in any game of their current series.
I hope this helps.
Posted:
#143
Quote Originally Posted by 72DAVE:
with u on the angels full Angle
with u on the angels full Angle
Always nice to hear from you Mr. McMurphy, I mean 72Dave! Is Nurse Ratchett going to let you watch the games today?
Quote Originally Posted by 72DAVE:
with u on the angels full Angle
with u on the angels full Angle
Always nice to hear from you Mr. McMurphy, I mean 72Dave! Is Nurse Ratchett going to let you watch the games today?
Posted:
#145
How much does anyone want to bet that McShady is NOT at the lake or wherever the boat is today?
Angle's Sunday prop bet of the day. Is McShady boating/fishing/at the lake? YES -200 NO+160
Wow, that's awfully juicy but if you chased it? I believe you would be up except for maybe when he was on vacation!!!
Angle's Sunday prop bet of the day. Is McShady boating/fishing/at the lake? YES -200 NO+160
Wow, that's awfully juicy but if you chased it? I believe you would be up except for maybe when he was on vacation!!!
How much does anyone want to bet that McShady is NOT at the lake or wherever the boat is today?
Angle's Sunday prop bet of the day. Is McShady boating/fishing/at the lake? YES -200 NO+160
Wow, that's awfully juicy but if you chased it? I believe you would be up except for maybe when he was on vacation!!!
Angle's Sunday prop bet of the day. Is McShady boating/fishing/at the lake? YES -200 NO+160
Wow, that's awfully juicy but if you chased it? I believe you would be up except for maybe when he was on vacation!!!
Posted:
#147
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
Posted:
#148
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
I know what you mean. You never know when a trend will take a loss, but overall I always play them if they are still "in play" on the LAST game of a series. I sometimes make a parlay with them! I did that today and right now the Phillies are over 7.5 and the Angels game is tied 2-1 in bottom 7th. I hope it holds up. Of course McShady won on the Yankees prop
and the F5 under on the Angels!
I forgot to mention earlier as I was busy before the Boston game started that I did jump-in but only went 4 units as juice was around -195. I usually bet more on my one game jump-ins but the Red Sox have sucked. I started to bet the RL-1.5 but did not. I hope it wins as it was my highest amount played today.
I believe the only team not yet swept is the Reds. Be aware of that if they are avoiding sweep on last game of series.
I can remember when there were 3 unswept teams, Texas/WhiSox/Reds. McShady had Texas vs Whi Sox first 2 games and changed to Whi Sox on game 3 because he believed after the first 2 games that Texas would get swept. I bit my lip and changed with him to WhiSox and they swept Texas!
From your avatar there, I gather you may be a Dallas Cowboys fan. I am local to Dallas area. I have been cleaning up fading the Cowboys for the last several years. They had a long streak of not winning any games by more than 4 points and my friends who were fans were simply amazed whenever I bet against them if the line was Dallas -4 or higher. They really love their Cowboys here and many are not that informed on point spreads.
Now getting to what I really wanted to say when I saw your avatar.
My book has the Cowboys regular season win total at under 9-130. I have heard about 9.5 in some places. If you can get action on 9 go with the under. The Cowboys are over-valued almost every year. I look for another 7-9 or at best 9-7 which would push on 9. Don't fall for Jerry Jones hype!
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
Thanks for clarifying this Angle....I been impressed but confused since I took the Mets and Phil's avoiding NL West sweeps like 30-1 trend a few weeks ago...and of course they split...
I know what you mean. You never know when a trend will take a loss, but overall I always play them if they are still "in play" on the LAST game of a series. I sometimes make a parlay with them! I did that today and right now the Phillies are over 7.5 and the Angels game is tied 2-1 in bottom 7th. I hope it holds up. Of course McShady won on the Yankees prop
and the F5 under on the Angels!
I forgot to mention earlier as I was busy before the Boston game started that I did jump-in but only went 4 units as juice was around -195. I usually bet more on my one game jump-ins but the Red Sox have sucked. I started to bet the RL-1.5 but did not. I hope it wins as it was my highest amount played today.
I believe the only team not yet swept is the Reds. Be aware of that if they are avoiding sweep on last game of series.
I can remember when there were 3 unswept teams, Texas/WhiSox/Reds. McShady had Texas vs Whi Sox first 2 games and changed to Whi Sox on game 3 because he believed after the first 2 games that Texas would get swept. I bit my lip and changed with him to WhiSox and they swept Texas!
From your avatar there, I gather you may be a Dallas Cowboys fan. I am local to Dallas area. I have been cleaning up fading the Cowboys for the last several years. They had a long streak of not winning any games by more than 4 points and my friends who were fans were simply amazed whenever I bet against them if the line was Dallas -4 or higher. They really love their Cowboys here and many are not that informed on point spreads.
Now getting to what I really wanted to say when I saw your avatar.
My book has the Cowboys regular season win total at under 9-130. I have heard about 9.5 in some places. If you can get action on 9 go with the under. The Cowboys are over-valued almost every year. I look for another 7-9 or at best 9-7 which would push on 9. Don't fall for Jerry Jones hype!
Posted:
#149
Quote Originally Posted by 72DAVE:
no!
iam sneakin out to golf good luck today buddy! taken the juice on shady. bol all!
You may be on to somethere there, McShady could be at the Phillies game, but it's not like him to not be here on Sunday for the Yankees 1st inning so can post this for his "YES score in the 1st inning prop"!
Quote Originally Posted by 72DAVE:
no!
iam sneakin out to golf good luck today buddy! taken the juice on shady. bol all!
You may be on to somethere there, McShady could be at the Phillies game, but it's not like him to not be here on Sunday for the Yankees 1st inning so can post this for his "YES score in the 1st inning prop"!
Posted:
#150
Oh well, Whi Sox up now 3-2 in bottom of 7th. Hope the Angels have some gas left in the tank of that bullpen or this under 9.5 could get ugly!
I knew I should have parlayed the F5 under instead. It's not over yet.
I knew I should have parlayed the F5 under instead. It's not over yet.
Oh well, Whi Sox up now 3-2 in bottom of 7th. Hope the Angels have some gas left in the tank of that bullpen or this under 9.5 could get ugly!
I knew I should have parlayed the F5 under instead. It's not over yet.
I knew I should have parlayed the F5 under instead. It's not over yet.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,577
-
Friday 09/11/2026
683
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
254,104
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,574
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,841
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,636
-
PART DEUX
164
-
9/11 Fast Cash Five 🤑🤑??
6,392
-
Trump's legacy?
25,321
-
Happening just recently . . .
34,680
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
