Posted: 7/30/2012 1:27:57 PMi was wondering if you like the over with santana and the angels tonight
santana has been very prone to overs in his last 10 starts
i also think that Texas can win this - Angel bats have been silent lately
I am a HUGE Angels fan!!! I have known this team for 40+ years. I sent an email in 2010 which stated they should get rid of certain players and the GM. Abreu, Wood, Mathis, Aybar, Wells and the GM (Reagans) They're all gone except for Aybar, whose doing better because the pressure of leadoff hitter is gone, and Wells, who was on the DL, until NOW.
That was all done in late May and the Angels started winning (Trout took the pace of Abreu). Yesterday and the day before, Wells played for the 1st time in over a month and the Angels were shut out BOTH games at HOME! Trout played on Sat. Today, Wells is out and Trout is in. I would not bet on Texas with Oswalt. He's scarier than Santana! The best bet would be Angels with Trout or NO bet!
0
Posted: 7/30/2012 1:27:57 PMi was wondering if you like the over with santana and the angels tonight
santana has been very prone to overs in his last 10 starts
i also think that Texas can win this - Angel bats have been silent lately
I am a HUGE Angels fan!!! I have known this team for 40+ years. I sent an email in 2010 which stated they should get rid of certain players and the GM. Abreu, Wood, Mathis, Aybar, Wells and the GM (Reagans) They're all gone except for Aybar, whose doing better because the pressure of leadoff hitter is gone, and Wells, who was on the DL, until NOW.
That was all done in late May and the Angels started winning (Trout took the pace of Abreu). Yesterday and the day before, Wells played for the 1st time in over a month and the Angels were shut out BOTH games at HOME! Trout played on Sat. Today, Wells is out and Trout is in. I would not bet on Texas with Oswalt. He's scarier than Santana! The best bet would be Angels with Trout or NO bet!
Hi si1ly I was wondering if you saw my post on the Cubs yesterday when you asked if anyone can give any type of reason not to bet them
you did not respond to it - i posted it kind of late. I was wondering if that was not enough to keep you off st louis, obviously it wasnt but it was a hell of a stat and I was wondering if you gave it any credence
thanks
It wasn't just you, many people came by yesterday with great reasons why I shouldn't fade Maholm. Ultimately I decided that Wainwright could at least match his effort - and I still believe Maholm will hit a decline any start now. After that, it was clear that St. Louis had a much better offense and advantage in bullpen so there were enough reasons to try and guess which start Maholm's streak would end. I guessed wrong, but not by much. 2-2 after 9 innings tells me that it was St. Louis' offense that was the problem and Maholm/Wainwright did little to factor in the outcome.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gold_Rush:
Hi si1ly I was wondering if you saw my post on the Cubs yesterday when you asked if anyone can give any type of reason not to bet them
you did not respond to it - i posted it kind of late. I was wondering if that was not enough to keep you off st louis, obviously it wasnt but it was a hell of a stat and I was wondering if you gave it any credence
thanks
It wasn't just you, many people came by yesterday with great reasons why I shouldn't fade Maholm. Ultimately I decided that Wainwright could at least match his effort - and I still believe Maholm will hit a decline any start now. After that, it was clear that St. Louis had a much better offense and advantage in bullpen so there were enough reasons to try and guess which start Maholm's streak would end. I guessed wrong, but not by much. 2-2 after 9 innings tells me that it was St. Louis' offense that was the problem and Maholm/Wainwright did little to factor in the outcome.
Posted: 7/30/2012 1:27:57 PMi was wondering if you like the over with santana and the angels tonight
santana has been very prone to overs in his last 10 starts
i also think that Texas can win this - Angel bats have been silent lately
I am a HUGE Angels fan!!! I have known this team for 40+ years. I sent an email in 2010 which stated they should get rid of certain players and the GM. Abreu, Wood, Mathis, Aybar, Wells and the GM (Reagans) They're all gone except for Aybar, whose doing better because the pressure of leadoff hitter is gone, and Wells, who was on the DL, until NOW.
That was all done in late May and the Angels started winning (Trout took the pace of Abreu). Yesterday and the day before, Wells played for the 1st time in over a month and the Angels were shut out BOTH games at HOME! Trout played on Sat. Today, Wells is out and Trout is in. I would not bet on Texas with Oswalt. He's scarier than Santana! The best bet would be Angels with Trout or NO bet!
I am very confused by your statements. Maybe I've read this wrong?
0
Quote Originally Posted by gbpackman:
Posted: 7/30/2012 1:27:57 PMi was wondering if you like the over with santana and the angels tonight
santana has been very prone to overs in his last 10 starts
i also think that Texas can win this - Angel bats have been silent lately
I am a HUGE Angels fan!!! I have known this team for 40+ years. I sent an email in 2010 which stated they should get rid of certain players and the GM. Abreu, Wood, Mathis, Aybar, Wells and the GM (Reagans) They're all gone except for Aybar, whose doing better because the pressure of leadoff hitter is gone, and Wells, who was on the DL, until NOW.
That was all done in late May and the Angels started winning (Trout took the pace of Abreu). Yesterday and the day before, Wells played for the 1st time in over a month and the Angels were shut out BOTH games at HOME! Trout played on Sat. Today, Wells is out and Trout is in. I would not bet on Texas with Oswalt. He's scarier than Santana! The best bet would be Angels with Trout or NO bet!
I am very confused by your statements. Maybe I've read this wrong?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.