2014 Spring Training
here's what i got , help me out guys make sure i understand stevo
last 2 games i have nationals + 7 cards - 3= nats +10
phillies +9, tigers - 13 = phillies +22
angels +10, oakland 0 = angels +10
padres + 10, royals - 9 = padres +22
rockies +9, giants -6 = rockies +15
help me out guys is this right , come on stevo thanks
here's what i got , help me out guys make sure i understand stevo
last 2 games i have nationals + 7 cards - 3= nats +10
phillies +9, tigers - 13 = phillies +22
angels +10, oakland 0 = angels +10
padres + 10, royals - 9 = padres +22
rockies +9, giants -6 = rockies +15
help me out guys is this right , come on stevo thanks
here's what i got , help me out guys make sure i understand stevo
last 2 games i have nationals + 7 cards - 3= nats +10
phillies +9, tigers - 13 = phillies +22
angels +10, oakland 0 = angels +10
padres + 10, royals - 9 = padres +22
rockies +9, giants -6 = rockies +15
help me out guys is this right , come on stevo thanks
I believe that in some situations you have to ignore the system. For example, the Tigers have started crappy pitchers. Therefore the numbers will be skewed against them. Verlander has yet to give up a run in ST. He has averaged 4 innings pitched per start. With this being his last start of preseason the question I have is will he go the same or will he go longer (possibly 6 or 7). Lee has good number also and has averaged 4 innings pitched per start. Regardless of the differential of the previous 2 games played, the Tigers should be the logical play. The Royals also start a pitcher who has an ERA half of what the Padres starter has today. Also, ignoring the Pirates because they put up three touchdowns yesterday and skew the system, they start Cumpton (2.93 ERA) vs Nolasco (7.07 ERA). The logical play is Pittsburgh IMHO. Just my 2 cents worth.
here's what i got , help me out guys make sure i understand stevo
last 2 games i have nationals + 7 cards - 3= nats +10
phillies +9, tigers - 13 = phillies +22
angels +10, oakland 0 = angels +10
padres + 10, royals - 9 = padres +22
rockies +9, giants -6 = rockies +15
help me out guys is this right , come on stevo thanks
I believe that in some situations you have to ignore the system. For example, the Tigers have started crappy pitchers. Therefore the numbers will be skewed against them. Verlander has yet to give up a run in ST. He has averaged 4 innings pitched per start. With this being his last start of preseason the question I have is will he go the same or will he go longer (possibly 6 or 7). Lee has good number also and has averaged 4 innings pitched per start. Regardless of the differential of the previous 2 games played, the Tigers should be the logical play. The Royals also start a pitcher who has an ERA half of what the Padres starter has today. Also, ignoring the Pirates because they put up three touchdowns yesterday and skew the system, they start Cumpton (2.93 ERA) vs Nolasco (7.07 ERA). The logical play is Pittsburgh IMHO. Just my 2 cents worth.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,077
- Friday 10/30/2026 633
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,632
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 287,639
- PART DEUX 251
- BEAT Your book 125,884
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 6,675
- NFL LOCKED IN! 111,068
- Philadelphia 76ers +1.5 2,306
- Week 9 Money 9,690
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
