Tough trading long this market..not much to be positive about, I am close to selling a few speculative positions..
February 2008 Stock Talk I
Tough trading long this market..not much to be positive about, I am close to selling a few speculative positions..
Tough trading long this market..not much to be positive about, I am close to selling a few speculative positions..
Are they outperforming the SPX for a large cap fund?
Compare the fund to the S&P and see if the fees and load make it worth it..remember that most mutual funds have loads and yearly fees, somtimes these costs and illiquidity make it not worth the while.
Illiquidity meaning many funds have trading restrictions..if you sell before a certain date you get dinged with a fee.
Are they outperforming the SPX for a large cap fund?
Compare the fund to the S&P and see if the fees and load make it worth it..remember that most mutual funds have loads and yearly fees, somtimes these costs and illiquidity make it not worth the while.
Illiquidity meaning many funds have trading restrictions..if you sell before a certain date you get dinged with a fee.
Is that 50 bucks a load credit that can be carried to another family fund?
Meaning usually when you are charged a load, if you trade it from one fund to another, you dont pay the load again if it is to another member of the mutual fund family.
Is that 50 bucks a load credit that can be carried to another family fund?
Meaning usually when you are charged a load, if you trade it from one fund to another, you dont pay the load again if it is to another member of the mutual fund family.
CSCO burped, down 7% in after hours..more NAZ selling tomorrow.
Yep.......
My timing is impeccable.
CSCO burped, down 7% in after hours..more NAZ selling tomorrow.
Yep.......
My timing is impeccable.
I think it is probably wise to keep in mind that there is no evidence that the essential problem that started this mess will be significantly addressed much less cured any time soon.
When I think of the proposed $600/person "solution," I laugh. Most of the people I have asked told me they were going to either a.save it b.pay debt off with it. Nobody has said "spend it" much less "pay part of a new mortgage with it." The housing mess is a long long term mess, not suited to ADD addled publics.
And like Samuel Johnson's definition of a patron (one who looks with unconcern on a man struggling for life in the water, and, when he has reached ground, encumbers him with help.), if it ever materializes it will be unnecessary.
I think it is probably wise to keep in mind that there is no evidence that the essential problem that started this mess will be significantly addressed much less cured any time soon.
When I think of the proposed $600/person "solution," I laugh. Most of the people I have asked told me they were going to either a.save it b.pay debt off with it. Nobody has said "spend it" much less "pay part of a new mortgage with it." The housing mess is a long long term mess, not suited to ADD addled publics.
And like Samuel Johnson's definition of a patron (one who looks with unconcern on a man struggling for life in the water, and, when he has reached ground, encumbers him with help.), if it ever materializes it will be unnecessary.
But banks have been preemptively slashing the values on their subprime-linked securities, figuring many of those guarantees won't materialize. And unless the ratings of Ambac and MBIA fall several notches to junk status, the additional losses for big banks would total between $30 billion and $40 billion. It's not an insignificant sum. But it's still far less than the $100 billion in writedowns Wall Street has already taken. As a result, many banks may be calculating that any losses they suffer could be less than the tens of billions Dinallo is demanding to prop up Ambac and MBIA.
Investors, then, may have to brace for more pain, though it's not likely to be crippling. "A bailout is not going to happen," says Robert B. Lamb, a professor at New York University's Stern School of Business. "The downgrades are inevitable, and investors will have to take losses."
But banks have been preemptively slashing the values on their subprime-linked securities, figuring many of those guarantees won't materialize. And unless the ratings of Ambac and MBIA fall several notches to junk status, the additional losses for big banks would total between $30 billion and $40 billion. It's not an insignificant sum. But it's still far less than the $100 billion in writedowns Wall Street has already taken. As a result, many banks may be calculating that any losses they suffer could be less than the tens of billions Dinallo is demanding to prop up Ambac and MBIA.
Investors, then, may have to brace for more pain, though it's not likely to be crippling. "A bailout is not going to happen," says Robert B. Lamb, a professor at New York University's Stern School of Business. "The downgrades are inevitable, and investors will have to take losses."
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- After coming up one vote short on their bill on Wednesday, Senate Democrats agreed Thursday to an economic stimulus bill backed by the Republican minority. The plan is similar to the House-passed measure, but would give tax rebate checks to seniors, veterans and disabled people. The bill also has provisions to prevent undocumented immigrants from receiving rebates. The Republican measure does not include an extension of unemployment benefits that was in the defeated Senate bill, nor does it give tax breaks for energy conservation. A vote on the floor on the Senate could come as soon as Thursday
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- After coming up one vote short on their bill on Wednesday, Senate Democrats agreed Thursday to an economic stimulus bill backed by the Republican minority. The plan is similar to the House-passed measure, but would give tax rebate checks to seniors, veterans and disabled people. The bill also has provisions to prevent undocumented immigrants from receiving rebates. The Republican measure does not include an extension of unemployment benefits that was in the defeated Senate bill, nor does it give tax breaks for energy conservation. A vote on the floor on the Senate could come as soon as Thursday
I think this market is grasping for anything that will take people's minds off reality.Not that fantasy is a bad thing...it made an awful lot of money for a lot of people the past few years.
I think this market is grasping for anything that will take people's minds off reality.Not that fantasy is a bad thing...it made an awful lot of money for a lot of people the past few years.
Big selloff over the last hour or so.
Gunners..me too...thats ok for me, I see promise for what they are doing, and their burn rate is quite slow. I will add tomorrow I am sure.
Big selloff over the last hour or so.
Gunners..me too...thats ok for me, I see promise for what they are doing, and their burn rate is quite slow. I will add tomorrow I am sure.
Hot Forum Topics
- Tuesday 11/10/2026 351
- BEAT Your book 127,560
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 300,743
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 63,592
- $$ALL IN ( 2x5uNIT=1-O,5UnitUNDER=4-2,5Unit over=1-O,5Unit ATS=2-O,2Unit=4-o_ =+ 43 Units 5,876
- Florida Man Tuesday 4,329
- *EdgeHunter Ohio VS Miami Ohio - NEW WEEK, NEW MONEY!* 2,982
- Bags Tuesday LARGE **Michigan State vs Duke** 2,367
- Trump's legacy? 37,170
- PART DEUX 77
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
