I know the FACTS take away the perception that he was targeted and never given any kind of chance to avoid arrest but the FACTS prove he was given multiple chances.
^^ From Randisist
So he was given multiple chances to avoid arrest for something that wasn't against the law.
If someone tells you multliple times to stop doing something when it's not against the law, are you going to stop doing it? I won't. You presented facts, but he wasn't breaking any law. This is a fact. HENCE HE WAS WRONGLY ARRESTED.
1. He had wore the shirt to school and been suspended the day before for the same exact shirt.
I would wear it again too.
2. He KNEW he was not suppose to wear the shirt to school.
Yes he did. He also knew he was doing nothing illegal or against school policy and that he was exercising his freedom of speech and not hurting anyone.
3. He WAS given the opportunity to remove the shirt or leave school.
Wow. Thanks for the choices but I'm doing nothing wrong so... I'm not going to do either and you're in fact in the wrong for harrassing me.
4. He refused to remove the shirt or leave the school grounds.
This is called standing up for your rights that are protected by the Constitution of the United States. I applaud him.
He knew the school had prohibited the shirt when he went to school wearing it.
The school has policies in place so that a student cannot wear a shirt that reads "kill all the white people". This is promoting racism and violence. His shirt does neither. However, there is no school policy that prohibits images of guns on shirts. Hence, and again, he wasn't breaking any school policy. The school can't, on the fly, force a student to take off his shirt if they don't like it. I understand he was pressing his luck and he could have chosen the easy route and agreed to not wear the shirt again. But instead he chose to wear it because he should be able to. It's not violating school policy.
And I would really like for anybody to tell me directly and specifically that they feel the school has no right to tell student that an article of clothing is improper and prohibited.
They don't. The peoples' taxes help pay for the school. They pay for books. They pay so that the kids can play sports and other extra curricular activities. If the school wants to make a policy that no student shall wear any clothing with any messages, then that's their choice. Put it in writing and submit it to parents and students. But they never did that. What if a student wears a shirt that reads "The Browns Suck"? Then we have a teacher that happens to be a big Browns fan and so is the principle. Is going to be given a choice of leaving or taking off the shirt?
There was no policy in place prohibiting a shirt with a gun on it. Hence, they were in the wrong. It's really as simple as that.