September 11, 2001 (long read)

Hutch has yet to show any evidence to prove otherwise.

_____________

I've shown you plenty of evidence....you just ignore it.  Innocent until proven guilty.....which puts the burden of proof on you, me boy.  And all you have is shoddy science, misleading information, and the fact that Johnny in middle school supposedly knew about the plan. 

You and the Duke Blue Devil can go and play in your little dream world.  I've answered question after question after question.....and you only address questions with B.S. googled from some conspiracy site in response.  That's what you types do....it's the shell game....just keep moving the ball around. 

one day in class we all had a good laugh.......

the classic pic of fire fighters were they show them by "Molten Metal"

PIC

see how close the guys face is to the light? do you have any idea how hot it would be!!!!!!

that Pic is fire fighters looking for survivors!!!!!!!

the light is search lighting

also, i love on "lose change" when the kids are like "we called Boeing and they said that these were not from their plans" it's like wow and there was no way you could have recorded this conversation, OK, i guess i will just take your word for it

I posted many other FACTS that you have yet to acknowledge.  It is clear there are people who had foreknowledge of the attacks, otherwise you wouldn't see the insider trading leading up to the event.  You have yet to address the 9-11 Commission members stating their report does not tell the whole truth.  No word from you on Dick and Bush, doing everything they could to impede the investigation. No word on the Commission NOT covering the actual crime scene or evidence.  

___________

These are interesting happenings that might have a LOT of different explanations.  There is no proof of anything....only interesting stories.  Let's say my mother was murdered and I decided to go on a cruise the next day.  Does that make me guilty?  Does that prove anything.  NADA.  Is it peculiar?  Does it maybe make someone ask me some questions?  Probably.

There is a difference, you simpleton. 

They called the plant that didn't even make the engines (probably on purpose) in question....so of course, Boeing says, "we dont' make those here" and those bumbling morons call that evidence. 

Never decided to talk to the guys at the plants that DID make the engines.

What investigative journalism. 

OK, I'll take that challenge.  Go ahead and post a quote from anyone (who was there) that contradicts what the firefighters said about WTC7. 

In other words, one quote....just one (like before) who did NOT say they thought the building was going to collapse. 

You give quotes from bunk scientists (I see you gave up the thermite thing ).  How 'bout some quotes from people actually witnessed it.

And not some jackass who says he saw a missile hit the pentagon...he's already been proven to be wrong. 

More cell phone FACTS if you're interested.  And FYI, cell phones in 2001 were a lot stronger then they are now.  Not all calls got through, but many did.

https://911myths.com/html/mobiles_at_altitude.html

It is clear there are people who had foreknowledge of the attacks, otherwise you wouldn't see the insider trading leading up to the event. 

_____________

You just assume this means the government is involved and quit there.  Perhaps you might try and find an explanation other then just assuming.  But you're not interested in that.  How 'bout you share some facts or some proof for a change.

Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options--investments that pay off only when a stock drops in price--surged in the parent companies of United Airlines on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10--highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. These examples typify the evidence examined by the investigation. The SEC and the FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous. Joseph Cella interview (Sept. 16, 2003; May 7, 2004; May 10-11, 2004); FBI briefing (Aug. 15, 2003); SEC memo, Division of Enforcement to SEC Chair and Commissioners, "Pre-September 11, 2001 Trading Review," May 15, 2002; Ken Breen interview (Apr. 23, 2004); Ed G. interview (Feb. 3, 2004).

and those who said they found parts of plane debris at the pentagon site..uh those parts were added to make it look like a plane.
____________

Yeah, they had a team just throw down thousands of pounds of debris and not a single person noticed.  And they planted the human remains too.

You're the dumbest one yet. 

You're dumb.

Yep, we live in a world where our technology gets WORSE as we move forward in time.  That makes total sense.

You're now becoming more and more disgustingly incredible with every post.  Your eagerness to address our points and instead "laugh them off" makes you look 100% gulity of knowing the truth

Keep it up

This will be easy

https://firefightersfor911truth.org/

https://www.petitiononline.com/fftruth/petition.html

https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_firefighters.html

I didn't have longer than 5 minutes tonight, but I can get many many more, if you wish

Also, why have you stopped talking about WTC7 freefall speed?  You wanted structural engineers to "put their reputations on the line".  You wanted one, just one.  Remember?  I gave you the team that our own government hired to investigate, NIST.  They claim that over 50% of the collapsing time was in freefall speed.  They claim the other 50% was obstructed by the falling debris pilling up below. 

Why do you so quickly want to start debunking Loose Change, when I never mentioned -anything- about that video clip?

The truth hurts, doesn't it Hutch

I don't like the fact that you're trying to get the name of the lady that I've spoken with.  I will NOT give you this information and if you cared about it enough, it is readily available to you.  All you have to do is ask.  But the answer won't come from me.  I promised her to not reveal her or her son's name.