If Christ died on the cross for all of humanity
Also, make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data. And no, you can't use the bible as proof of what the bible says is true. Good luck.
Also, make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data. And no, you can't use the bible as proof of what the bible says is true. Good luck.
You guys are dumb for this blasphemy. I agree, religion is a social thing, however, when you look at the historical facts of our Lord Savior, you would all bite your tongues. He died for us. Be thankful.
You guys are dumb for this blasphemy. I agree, religion is a social thing, however, when you look at the historical facts of our Lord Savior, you would all bite your tongues. He died for us. Be thankful.
1. A statement is not invalid if it contains sarcasm dumb f#$%.
Reply: You just proved my point...lol All you non believers do is use sarcasm, put downs, vulgar language, which are all invalid because it doesn't do anything to disprove the existence of Almighty God.
2. Sarcasm is a literary device.
Reply: No!...really?...lol It's absolutely good for nothing. It is just an emotional outburst designed to ridicule and not give out any pertinent facts.
3. Really, the education level of the "believers" is sooooo prohibitive to debate.
Reply: There you go again...making my point...lol
4. But what would you expect from someone touting their "christian" beliefs on a gambling, soft porn site... ![]()
Reply: I gave you an response way back on pg. 69 #1710 on why we believers are trying to spread the Good News (The Gospel) on this site.
![]()
![]()
1. A statement is not invalid if it contains sarcasm dumb f#$%.
Reply: You just proved my point...lol All you non believers do is use sarcasm, put downs, vulgar language, which are all invalid because it doesn't do anything to disprove the existence of Almighty God.
2. Sarcasm is a literary device.
Reply: No!...really?...lol It's absolutely good for nothing. It is just an emotional outburst designed to ridicule and not give out any pertinent facts.
3. Really, the education level of the "believers" is sooooo prohibitive to debate.
Reply: There you go again...making my point...lol
4. But what would you expect from someone touting their "christian" beliefs on a gambling, soft porn site... ![]()
Reply: I gave you an response way back on pg. 69 #1710 on why we believers are trying to spread the Good News (The Gospel) on this site.
![]()
![]()
So, if you don't believe something you must leave all your reasoning skills at the door, and keep your logical conclusions to yourself?
What a load of rubbish. Because I do not believe in something doesn't mean I lose the ability to critique it. I don't believe people rise from the dead. I don't now not have a seat at the table telling dumb f#$%'s such as yourself that a dead person rising from the grave is, given the best information we humans have been able to gather, not possible.
The problem with a debate with you "believers" is having to start from a first grade level.
More personal insults
So, if you don't believe something you must leave all your reasoning skills at the door, and keep your logical conclusions to yourself?
What a load of rubbish. Because I do not believe in something doesn't mean I lose the ability to critique it. I don't believe people rise from the dead. I don't now not have a seat at the table telling dumb f#$%'s such as yourself that a dead person rising from the grave is, given the best information we humans have been able to gather, not possible.
The problem with a debate with you "believers" is having to start from a first grade level.
More personal insults
You can't use the bible as proof of what the bible says is true. You are another class A dumb f@%^$.
More personal insults.
You can't use the bible as proof of what the bible says is true. You are another class A dumb f@%^$.
More personal insults.
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
Yeah, I know he can't answer any questions he is just confused like the rest of them. Here we are trying to help them but because they are stubborn and too confused they will not listen. They will have to experience some miracle in their lives for them to start believing, talking to them is a difficult task.
If I ask him or any other non believer what evidence do you have that God doesn't exist, they cannot give any valid answer.
Whereas if they ask me or any other believer what evidence do we have that God exist, we can give them an abundance of evidences like nature (the fine tuning of the cosmos which points to an intelligent designer, a Creator), philosophical reasons, archaeological findings (which authenticates many of the passages in the bible), man, the Holy Bible (which is the Word of God), the life and ministry, the miracles and the resurrection of our Lord Savior Jesus Christ but they will not open their hearts and minds to the truth.
They live their lives in the darkness and when the time comes to account for their lives they will be unprepared and totally shocked and dismayed come Judgment Day.
![]()
SJD...
Even my 10 yr old niece knows that when someone resorts to insults instead of answering the question, it means that they have no answer to your question, and furthermore realise it is the truth what you are saying which strikes a raw nerve with them...
Jagefury falls in this category.......
Dont bother replying to him, he wont answer any questions, because he cant, he thereffore will just reply with insults..........
Yeah, I know he can't answer any questions he is just confused like the rest of them. Here we are trying to help them but because they are stubborn and too confused they will not listen. They will have to experience some miracle in their lives for them to start believing, talking to them is a difficult task.
If I ask him or any other non believer what evidence do you have that God doesn't exist, they cannot give any valid answer.
Whereas if they ask me or any other believer what evidence do we have that God exist, we can give them an abundance of evidences like nature (the fine tuning of the cosmos which points to an intelligent designer, a Creator), philosophical reasons, archaeological findings (which authenticates many of the passages in the bible), man, the Holy Bible (which is the Word of God), the life and ministry, the miracles and the resurrection of our Lord Savior Jesus Christ but they will not open their hearts and minds to the truth.
They live their lives in the darkness and when the time comes to account for their lives they will be unprepared and totally shocked and dismayed come Judgment Day.
![]()
Since my atheist friends love science so much. Here is your precious atheism scientifically proven that it's hogwash in 82 seconds.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAY9d-tiO_Y&feature=youtu.be Of course we know the hardcore atheist will denounce this but i just wanted to throw this out there to get your reaction to it. I found it very interesting since it came from a scientist and we all know how you atheist love scientists.
Come on smooth. This does nothing to prove god at all. You're better than that!!
Since my atheist friends love science so much. Here is your precious atheism scientifically proven that it's hogwash in 82 seconds.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAY9d-tiO_Y&feature=youtu.be Of course we know the hardcore atheist will denounce this but i just wanted to throw this out there to get your reaction to it. I found it very interesting since it came from a scientist and we all know how you atheist love scientists.
Come on smooth. This does nothing to prove god at all. You're better than that!!
do you have a son? a daughter?
if you know that your son know people who are drug addicts (sinners)
and he dies for them for some sort of reason. maybe saving them from a fire or whatever
wont it be a big deal to you ?
do you have a son? a daughter?
if you know that your son know people who are drug addicts (sinners)
and he dies for them for some sort of reason. maybe saving them from a fire or whatever
wont it be a big deal to you ?
My intention wasn't too prove God because God is... Scientifically speaking I'm asking atheist to refute his claim. Since you guys love science so much.
Make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data.... And some basic comprehension of basic reasoning skills would be preferred.
I guess it is too much to ask for the believers to discuss anything with some semblance of sense. This is so much gobbly-person. The sad part is the dumb f$%@ thinks he actually makes sense.
Smoothed20 you are talking nonsense out of your ass. You sir, are a dumb f%$@.
My intention wasn't too prove God because God is... Scientifically speaking I'm asking atheist to refute his claim. Since you guys love science so much.
Make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data.... And some basic comprehension of basic reasoning skills would be preferred.
I guess it is too much to ask for the believers to discuss anything with some semblance of sense. This is so much gobbly-person. The sad part is the dumb f$%@ thinks he actually makes sense.
Smoothed20 you are talking nonsense out of your ass. You sir, are a dumb f%$@.
"Consider the simplest statement of scientific fact: Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. This seems as value-free an utterance as human beings ever make.
But what do we do when someone doubts the truth of this proposition? Ok, all we can do is appeal to scientific values. The value of understanding the world. The value of evidence. The value of logical consistency. What if someone says, “Well, that’s not how I choose to think about water. Ok, I’m Biblical chemist, and I read in Genesis 1 that God created water before he created light. So I take that to mean that there were no stars. So there were no stars to fuse hydrogen and helium into heavier elements like oxygen; therefore there was no oxygen to put in the water, so either God created, either water has no oxygen, or God created special oxygen to put in the water—but I don’t think he would do that, because that would be Biblically inelegant.”
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
Sam Harris directly talking to Rostos and his buddies.
"Consider the simplest statement of scientific fact: Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. This seems as value-free an utterance as human beings ever make.
But what do we do when someone doubts the truth of this proposition? Ok, all we can do is appeal to scientific values. The value of understanding the world. The value of evidence. The value of logical consistency. What if someone says, “Well, that’s not how I choose to think about water. Ok, I’m Biblical chemist, and I read in Genesis 1 that God created water before he created light. So I take that to mean that there were no stars. So there were no stars to fuse hydrogen and helium into heavier elements like oxygen; therefore there was no oxygen to put in the water, so either God created, either water has no oxygen, or God created special oxygen to put in the water—but I don’t think he would do that, because that would be Biblically inelegant.”
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
Sam Harris directly talking to Rostos and his buddies.
Make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data.... And some basic comprehension of basic reasoning skills would be preferred.
I guess it is too much to ask for the believers to discuss anything with some semblance of sense. This is so much gobbly-person. The sad part is the dumb f$%@ thinks he actually makes sense.
Smoothed20 you are talking nonsense out of your ass. You sir, are a dumb f%$@.
Make sure you have some comprehension of what counts as scientific proof, and/or data.... And some basic comprehension of basic reasoning skills would be preferred.
I guess it is too much to ask for the believers to discuss anything with some semblance of sense. This is so much gobbly-person. The sad part is the dumb f$%@ thinks he actually makes sense.
Smoothed20 you are talking nonsense out of your ass. You sir, are a dumb f%$@.
-- Thomas Paine
-- Thomas Paine
where in the bible does it say doing drugs is a sin? God put the drugs here for us to use you dumb fuck.
For medical purposes it is ok, however it is not ok for recreational or for the occult uses.
In the holy bible the book of Galatians 5:19-21 says: The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery, idolatry and witchcraft (which includes the use of drugs); hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions, and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
The non-medical recreational use of drugs is considered one of the acts of a sinful nature. Witchcraft or sorcery refers to the use of drugs. The Apostle Paul calls witchcraft associated with drug use a sin. Using drugs to get a high or to tap into the occult are acts of a sinful nature where users demonstrate their depraved and carnal nature.
![]()
where in the bible does it say doing drugs is a sin? God put the drugs here for us to use you dumb fuck.
For medical purposes it is ok, however it is not ok for recreational or for the occult uses.
In the holy bible the book of Galatians 5:19-21 says: The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery, idolatry and witchcraft (which includes the use of drugs); hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions, and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
The non-medical recreational use of drugs is considered one of the acts of a sinful nature. Witchcraft or sorcery refers to the use of drugs. The Apostle Paul calls witchcraft associated with drug use a sin. Using drugs to get a high or to tap into the occult are acts of a sinful nature where users demonstrate their depraved and carnal nature.
![]()
"Consider the simplest statement of scientific fact: Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. This seems as value-free an utterance as human beings ever make.
But what do we do when someone doubts the truth of this proposition? Ok, all we can do is appeal to scientific values. The value of understanding the world. The value of evidence. The value of logical consistency. What if someone says, “Well, that’s not how I choose to think about water. Ok, I’m Biblical chemist, and I read in Genesis 1 that God created water before he created light. So I take that to mean that there were no stars. So there were no stars to fuse hydrogen and helium into heavier elements like oxygen; therefore there was no oxygen to put in the water, so either God created, either water has no oxygen, or God created special oxygen to put in the water—but I don’t think he would do that, because that would be Biblically inelegant.”
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
Sam Harris directly talking to Rostos and his buddies.
The bible isnt a science textbook..Never has claimed to be.
You want to talk about evidence?
What evidence does a blind person have that the sky is blue and the grass is green?
"Consider the simplest statement of scientific fact: Water is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen. This seems as value-free an utterance as human beings ever make.
But what do we do when someone doubts the truth of this proposition? Ok, all we can do is appeal to scientific values. The value of understanding the world. The value of evidence. The value of logical consistency. What if someone says, “Well, that’s not how I choose to think about water. Ok, I’m Biblical chemist, and I read in Genesis 1 that God created water before he created light. So I take that to mean that there were no stars. So there were no stars to fuse hydrogen and helium into heavier elements like oxygen; therefore there was no oxygen to put in the water, so either God created, either water has no oxygen, or God created special oxygen to put in the water—but I don’t think he would do that, because that would be Biblically inelegant.”
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
Sam Harris directly talking to Rostos and his buddies.
The bible isnt a science textbook..Never has claimed to be.
You want to talk about evidence?
What evidence does a blind person have that the sky is blue and the grass is green?
"There is scarcely any part of science, or anything in nature, which those impostors and blasphemers of science, called priests, as well Christians as person, have not, at some time or other, perverted, or sought to pervert to the purpose of superstition and falsehood."
-- Thomas Paine
I am sure Dr Francis Collins OWNER of theworld genome project which is doing wonderful things for cures of diseases would agree with you.......![]()
He wasnt raised a Christian and ONLY became one when he became a DR / Scientist.
"There is scarcely any part of science, or anything in nature, which those impostors and blasphemers of science, called priests, as well Christians as person, have not, at some time or other, perverted, or sought to pervert to the purpose of superstition and falsehood."
-- Thomas Paine
I am sure Dr Francis Collins OWNER of theworld genome project which is doing wonderful things for cures of diseases would agree with you.......![]()
He wasnt raised a Christian and ONLY became one when he became a DR / Scientist.
The bible isnt a science textbook..Never has claimed to be.
You want to talk about evidence?
What evidence does a blind person have that the sky is blue and the grass is green?
And just like I posted originally, a non-logical person trying to create a logical debate. A person who discounts evidence trying to start an evidenciary debate.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Read this again:
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
The bible isnt a science textbook..Never has claimed to be.
You want to talk about evidence?
What evidence does a blind person have that the sky is blue and the grass is green?
And just like I posted originally, a non-logical person trying to create a logical debate. A person who discounts evidence trying to start an evidenciary debate.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Read this again:
Ok, what can we say to such a person? All we can do is appeal to scientific values. And if he doesn’t share those values, the conversation is over. If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?"
Rostos - you are such a silly person.
What it must be like to live in fear every day of the boogey man. How insecure must you be to base your whole life on something that has no basis - simply out of the fear of made up consequences. What must it take to ignore all evidence and facts in favor of superstitions and rituals.
It is really silly.
Rostos - you are such a silly person.
What it must be like to live in fear every day of the boogey man. How insecure must you be to base your whole life on something that has no basis - simply out of the fear of made up consequences. What must it take to ignore all evidence and facts in favor of superstitions and rituals.
It is really silly.
Rostos - you are such a silly person.
What it must be like to live in fear every day of the boogey man. How insecure must you be to base your whole life on something that has no basis - simply out of the fear of made up consequences. What must it take to ignore all evidence and facts in favor of superstitions and rituals.
It is really silly.
Rostos - you are such a silly person.
What it must be like to live in fear every day of the boogey man. How insecure must you be to base your whole life on something that has no basis - simply out of the fear of made up consequences. What must it take to ignore all evidence and facts in favor of superstitions and rituals.
It is really silly.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 461,725
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 278,524
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,460
- Saturday 10/17/2026 691
- All About streak Survivor! 6,030
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 47,653
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,533
- Ohio State Buckeyes @ Indiana Hoosiers 5,095
- Week 7 Money 16,020
- NFL LOCKED IN! 107,712
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
