• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 5
      NFL Week 5
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    After El Chapo will the government ever get serious about war on drugs

    «First Previous 1234
    ClubDirt
    Raiders22
    dl36
    SarasotaSlim
    I_Need_A_Detox
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 5081
    Posts: 98
    «First Previous 1234
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:02 PM ET #76

    You're going to have to show me these stats that you say "overwhelmingly" show the resources are spent going after dealers when the stats posted in this thread from the FBI showed that 82% of drug arrests are possession cases.
    Reply
    You're going to have to show me these stats that you say "overwhelmingly" show the resources are spent going after dealers when the stats posted in this thread from the FBI showed that 82% of drug arrests are possession cases.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:03 PM ET #77

    With about half of those arrests being marijuana possession.
    Reply
    With about half of those arrests being marijuana possession.
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:33 PM ET #78

    You don't seriously think the DEA is tracking down your next door neighbor for smoking weed?
    Reply
    You don't seriously think the DEA is tracking down your next door neighbor for smoking weed?
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:38 PM ET #79

    When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke.  They are not wasting time or money doing his.  They could care less about him. Trust me.  This is common sense. 
    I can send you numbers on this. But you will push them aside as you did with the article.  You are not trying to be convinced or even see both sides.  Numbers will not help you. Your mind is made up. Which is fine.  I just don't get it with the way you are attempting to explain your view is all. 
    Sure lots more marijuana arrests.  Simply more of them to arrest.  Liberals have no problem with weed so this really irks them.  Don't do weed and you don't get arrested.  
    Far, far, far fewer drug lords than marihuana users is all. And they are easier to catch.  
    Do you want drug users of any kind arrested?  Do you want drug dealers of any kind arrested?
    Reply
    When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke.  They are not wasting time or money doing his.  They could care less about him. Trust me.  This is common sense. 
    I can send you numbers on this. But you will push them aside as you did with the article.  You are not trying to be convinced or even see both sides.  Numbers will not help you. Your mind is made up. Which is fine.  I just don't get it with the way you are attempting to explain your view is all. 
    Sure lots more marijuana arrests.  Simply more of them to arrest.  Liberals have no problem with weed so this really irks them.  Don't do weed and you don't get arrested.  
    Far, far, far fewer drug lords than marihuana users is all. And they are easier to catch.  
    Do you want drug users of any kind arrested?  Do you want drug dealers of any kind arrested?
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:56 PM ET #80

    the DEA is a tiny part of the money and resources spent on the war on drugs.  if you want to discuss who is spending time, money and resources on the war on drugs, you'd focus on the thousands of police departments around the country that make the overwhelming majority of drug arrests. 

    if it was just the DEA involved, we wouldn't have this ridiculously liberal waste of money, time, resources and infrastructure.
    Reply
    the DEA is a tiny part of the money and resources spent on the war on drugs.  if you want to discuss who is spending time, money and resources on the war on drugs, you'd focus on the thousands of police departments around the country that make the overwhelming majority of drug arrests. 

    if it was just the DEA involved, we wouldn't have this ridiculously liberal waste of money, time, resources and infrastructure.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 2:58 PM ET #81

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke.  They are not wasting time or money doing his.  They could care less about him. Trust me.  This is common sense. 
    I can send you numbers on this. But you will push them aside as you did with the article.  You are not trying to be convinced or even see both sides.  Numbers will not help you. Your mind is made up. Which is fine.  I just don't get it with the way you are attempting to explain your view is all. 
    Sure lots more marijuana arrests.  Simply more of them to arrest.  Liberals have no problem with weed so this really irks them.  Don't do weed and you don't get arrested.  
    Far, far, far fewer drug lords than marihuana users is all. And they are easier to catch.  
    Do you want drug users of any kind arrested?  Do you want drug dealers of any kind arrested?


    my mind is made up because i know how the system works.  but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke.  They are not wasting time or money doing his.  They could care less about him. Trust me.  This is common sense. 
    I can send you numbers on this. But you will push them aside as you did with the article.  You are not trying to be convinced or even see both sides.  Numbers will not help you. Your mind is made up. Which is fine.  I just don't get it with the way you are attempting to explain your view is all. 
    Sure lots more marijuana arrests.  Simply more of them to arrest.  Liberals have no problem with weed so this really irks them.  Don't do weed and you don't get arrested.  
    Far, far, far fewer drug lords than marihuana users is all. And they are easier to catch.  
    Do you want drug users of any kind arrested?  Do you want drug dealers of any kind arrested?


    my mind is made up because i know how the system works.  but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76. 
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 3:44 PM ET #82

    Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:

    But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.

    The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).

    Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.

    Reply
    Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:

    But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.

    The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).

    Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 3:49 PM ET #83

    Huh?  Of course the 'thousands of local police depts' make more arrests.  There are more of them. But most of the local depts are chasing small time or just happening upon users. They are not tracking down users. 
    By your argument DEA et al need even more money to track down big guys.  
    But you have to try to help rehab and prevent the start of using drugs. So yes, a huge bulk of the money is not directly mainly at tracking down the big guys.  That is not my point.  That is your point.  You don't want to spend money on it at all.  
    I am not an advocate of the adage of not saying something is wrong if you don't have a solution.  I think that is defensive and not correct.  Just because I recognize something is wrong doesn't mean I have to have another/better solution. It just means I recognize the current one is wrong. 
    But I will ask---do you have a better solution?
    Reply
    Huh?  Of course the 'thousands of local police depts' make more arrests.  There are more of them. But most of the local depts are chasing small time or just happening upon users. They are not tracking down users. 
    By your argument DEA et al need even more money to track down big guys.  
    But you have to try to help rehab and prevent the start of using drugs. So yes, a huge bulk of the money is not directly mainly at tracking down the big guys.  That is not my point.  That is your point.  You don't want to spend money on it at all.  
    I am not an advocate of the adage of not saying something is wrong if you don't have a solution.  I think that is defensive and not correct.  Just because I recognize something is wrong doesn't mean I have to have another/better solution. It just means I recognize the current one is wrong. 
    But I will ask---do you have a better solution?
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:00 PM ET #84

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:



    my mind is made up because i know how the system works.  but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76. 
    I am not sure there is a breakdown for money spent on tracking down users versus tracking down dealers. 
    But you can't seriously think much money and time is spent tracking down users?  They are generally just caught, usually doing something else or being involved in other activities and simply charged with possession also. Local sheriff and policeman not spending time trying to find as many users as possible?  They might do that with speeders because they have radar and it is easier. 
    But by definition folks like DEA are tracking down dealers.  The complete budget is spent on that---could care less about users. 
    Now you can say when locals happen on marijuana users they can ignore it. I know this is done---have seen it done.  Maybe you can argue that side of it if you like. 
    But to say you know how the systems works is duplicitous at best.  It works like this: get caught and arrested for drugs and get fine or small time.  Get caught dealing you get solid time.  Be big time and get caught and you get serious time. 
    Just because more users are caught and mostly arrested does NOT mean that the majority of the effort and funds are spent on them. It is just what you see and hear more. Simply a numbers matter. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:



    my mind is made up because i know how the system works.  but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76. 
    I am not sure there is a breakdown for money spent on tracking down users versus tracking down dealers. 
    But you can't seriously think much money and time is spent tracking down users?  They are generally just caught, usually doing something else or being involved in other activities and simply charged with possession also. Local sheriff and policeman not spending time trying to find as many users as possible?  They might do that with speeders because they have radar and it is easier. 
    But by definition folks like DEA are tracking down dealers.  The complete budget is spent on that---could care less about users. 
    Now you can say when locals happen on marijuana users they can ignore it. I know this is done---have seen it done.  Maybe you can argue that side of it if you like. 
    But to say you know how the systems works is duplicitous at best.  It works like this: get caught and arrested for drugs and get fine or small time.  Get caught dealing you get solid time.  Be big time and get caught and you get serious time. 
    Just because more users are caught and mostly arrested does NOT mean that the majority of the effort and funds are spent on them. It is just what you see and hear more. Simply a numbers matter. 
     
    dl36
    dl36
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2003
    Posts: 27850
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:00 PM ET #85

    It's funny how entrenched some people are that their "war" right. My theory Is has more to do with who started it and then politics than the efficacy. Especially when the discussion becomes around numbers and reality
    Reply
    It's funny how entrenched some people are that their "war" right. My theory Is has more to do with who started it and then politics than the efficacy. Especially when the discussion becomes around numbers and reality
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:12 PM ET #86

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:

    But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.

    The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).

    Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.



    of course he is. liberal, big government programs snowball. 

    i guess him saying he's going to spend all that money to target producers and dealers sounds better than spending billions to arrest possessors at an 82% rate.  what a novel idea.

    let us know how this groundbreaking plan works out when the next round of drug arrests numbers come out. 


    as to your post 83, i'm not sure what you're talking about for most of it but as to your last question, i do have a solution.  and i've stated it at least once already.  here it is again.

    1. legalize marijuana.

    2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases

    3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases. 

    4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.

    that would be a start
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:

    But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.

    The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).

    Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.



    of course he is. liberal, big government programs snowball. 

    i guess him saying he's going to spend all that money to target producers and dealers sounds better than spending billions to arrest possessors at an 82% rate.  what a novel idea.

    let us know how this groundbreaking plan works out when the next round of drug arrests numbers come out. 


    as to your post 83, i'm not sure what you're talking about for most of it but as to your last question, i do have a solution.  and i've stated it at least once already.  here it is again.

    1. legalize marijuana.

    2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases

    3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases. 

    4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.

    that would be a start
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:46 PM ET #87

    Ok. Those are fine. 
    Now handle the hard stuff?
    Reply
    Ok. Those are fine. 
    Now handle the hard stuff?
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:50 PM ET #88

    Please don't pretend to not comprehend the post.  It is fairly straight forward as I have said it more than once and more than one way. 
    You can choose to say that you don't like the facts.  But you cannot choose to say they are not the facts.  The why is the part in dispute is all. 
    But your solution to marihuana is the only partial answer the Left has.  They never complete the thought.  I don't dispute that the Right hasn't answered the question completely.  I just think they realize more of the problem is all. 
    Reply
    Please don't pretend to not comprehend the post.  It is fairly straight forward as I have said it more than once and more than one way. 
    You can choose to say that you don't like the facts.  But you cannot choose to say they are not the facts.  The why is the part in dispute is all. 
    But your solution to marihuana is the only partial answer the Left has.  They never complete the thought.  I don't dispute that the Right hasn't answered the question completely.  I just think they realize more of the problem is all. 
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 4:53 PM ET #89

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Ok. Those are fine. 
    Now handle the hard stuff?


    i know i say this a lot, but i have no idea what you are talking about with this question.  what specific question do you have for me now?



    also, i have no idea how you define left and right, liberal and conservative, but i guess that's another matter.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Ok. Those are fine. 
    Now handle the hard stuff?


    i know i say this a lot, but i have no idea what you are talking about with this question.  what specific question do you have for me now?



    also, i have no idea how you define left and right, liberal and conservative, but i guess that's another matter.
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 6:53 PM ET #90

    You say legalize marijuana and and stop mandatory sentencing and stop charging users. And send users to rehab (whether they want it or not?)
    My question is what do you do with the other (harder) drugs?

    In this case Liberal is for stopping War on Drugs and Conservative is not for stopping it.  
    Reply
    You say legalize marijuana and and stop mandatory sentencing and stop charging users. And send users to rehab (whether they want it or not?)
    My question is what do you do with the other (harder) drugs?

    In this case Liberal is for stopping War on Drugs and Conservative is not for stopping it.  
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 7:16 PM ET #91

    oh, i see the misunderstanding.

    my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1.  i would only legalize marijuana. 


    Reply
    oh, i see the misunderstanding.

    my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1.  i would only legalize marijuana. 


     
    SarasotaSlim
    SarasotaSlim
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 35524
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 8:23 PM ET #92

    According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances...   Most not all...
    Reply
    According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances...   Most not all...
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 8:45 PM ET #93

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    oh, i see the misunderstanding.

    my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1.  i would only legalize marijuana. 


    Fair enough. 
    Thoughts on what you would do for the other drugs?  Users and dealers?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    oh, i see the misunderstanding.

    my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1.  i would only legalize marijuana. 


    Fair enough. 
    Thoughts on what you would do for the other drugs?  Users and dealers?
     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34500
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 8:50 PM ET #94

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances...   Most not all...
    Yes this is an example of Conservative propaganda. 
    It is not a gateway drug. In the sense that it does not induce users to try harder stuff.  But I will say this nearly all hard users have tried marijuana.  Haha!  Depends on how you look at it.  Sadly, some folks just have a flat out addictive personality.  Some just wanna chill out.  Don't get either. But oh well. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances...   Most not all...
    Yes this is an example of Conservative propaganda. 
    It is not a gateway drug. In the sense that it does not induce users to try harder stuff.  But I will say this nearly all hard users have tried marijuana.  Haha!  Depends on how you look at it.  Sadly, some folks just have a flat out addictive personality.  Some just wanna chill out.  Don't get either. But oh well. 
     
    I_Need_A_Detox
    I_Need_A_Detox
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2011
    Posts: 27139
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2015 - 9:02 PM ET #95

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Fair enough. 
    Thoughts on what you would do for the other drugs?  Users and dealers?

    2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases

    3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.  

    4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

    Fair enough. 
    Thoughts on what you would do for the other drugs?  Users and dealers?

    2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases

    3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.  

    4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
     
    spocsstocks
    spocsstocks
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 1263
    Posted: Jul. 19, 2015 - 5:59 PM ET #96

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html

    Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape.  You knew it was coming.  More government workers.  If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it.  We might as well just let everyone do what they want. 

    It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff.  That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence.  The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha. 

    It reminds me of stuff like this.  https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/

    A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them.  So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to.  Drugs are insanely dumb.  All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.

    You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi.  Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice.  Drugs lead to violence. 

    You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home.  If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke.  Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.

    Reply

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html

    Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape.  You knew it was coming.  More government workers.  If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it.  We might as well just let everyone do what they want. 

    It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff.  That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence.  The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha. 

    It reminds me of stuff like this.  https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/

    A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them.  So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to.  Drugs are insanely dumb.  All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.

    You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi.  Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice.  Drugs lead to violence. 

    You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home.  If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke.  Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.

     
    Killer_B
    Killer_B
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 6291
    Posted: Jul. 19, 2015 - 7:19 PM ET #97

    What I love about this situation is our infatuation with millions of people coming from this country to bring their corruption with them. The Mexican government is corrupt to it's core, you think when they large numbers get here that it won't be corrupt?

    Is it the land that makes Mexico what it is? Or the people?
    Reply
    What I love about this situation is our infatuation with millions of people coming from this country to bring their corruption with them. The Mexican government is corrupt to it's core, you think when they large numbers get here that it won't be corrupt?

    Is it the land that makes Mexico what it is? Or the people?
     
     
    BET24K
    BET24K
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2015
    Posts: 12
    Posted: Aug. 29, 2015 - 10:45 AM ET #98

    No
    Reply
    No
    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 1234

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 460,355
    • Thursday 10/08/2026 435
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,890
    • PART DEUX 151
    • TB/BOYS live in game comment welcome 842
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,853
    • Week 6 Money 8,394
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 36,249
    • 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,792
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 105,243

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.