After El Chapo will the government ever get serious about war on drugs
if it was just the DEA involved, we wouldn't have this ridiculously liberal waste of money, time, resources and infrastructure.
if it was just the DEA involved, we wouldn't have this ridiculously liberal waste of money, time, resources and infrastructure.
When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke. They are not wasting time or money doing his. They could care less about him. Trust me. This is common sense.
my mind is made up because i know how the system works. but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76.
When was the last time you saw a DEA task force take down a fellow for having pot to smoke. They are not wasting time or money doing his. They could care less about him. Trust me. This is common sense.
my mind is made up because i know how the system works. but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76.
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
my mind is made up because i know how the system works. but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76.
my mind is made up because i know how the system works. but if you have these numbers, you can start by supporting your argument and responding to my request for stats in post 76.
Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
of course he is. liberal, big government programs snowball.
i guess him saying he's going to spend all that money to target producers and dealers sounds better than spending billions to arrest possessors at an 82% rate. what a novel idea.
let us know how this groundbreaking plan works out when the next round of drug arrests numbers come out.
as to your post 83, i'm not sure what you're talking about for most of it but as to your last question, i do have a solution. and i've stated it at least once already. here it is again.
1. legalize marijuana.
2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases
3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.
4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
that would be a start
Also to show even the Liberal BHO is spending more on it:
But although the ratio is shifting, Obama still intends to spend the bulk of U.S. drug war money on efforts to block producers and dealers. His plan to spend a total of $14.4 billion attacking the supply side is $2.5 billion more than would be spent on the demand side.
The $25 billion in funding is spread across at least 10 different agencies, with the bulk of it going to the Health and Human Services Department ($8.7 billion), Justice Department ($7.8 billion) and Homeland Security Department ($4.1 billion).
Meanwhile, direct spending on the war on drugs continues to climb. In 2010, when Obama launched his new anti-drug approach, the country spent $24.6 billion on anti-drug programs. If Obama gets his way, in 2015 it will spend that—plus $740 million more.
of course he is. liberal, big government programs snowball.
i guess him saying he's going to spend all that money to target producers and dealers sounds better than spending billions to arrest possessors at an 82% rate. what a novel idea.
let us know how this groundbreaking plan works out when the next round of drug arrests numbers come out.
as to your post 83, i'm not sure what you're talking about for most of it but as to your last question, i do have a solution. and i've stated it at least once already. here it is again.
1. legalize marijuana.
2. get rid of mandatory minimum sentences for drug cases
3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.
4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
that would be a start
Ok. Those are fine.
i know i say this a lot, but i have no idea what you are talking about with this question. what specific question do you have for me now?
also, i have no idea how you define left and right, liberal and conservative, but i guess that's another matter.
Ok. Those are fine.
i know i say this a lot, but i have no idea what you are talking about with this question. what specific question do you have for me now?
also, i have no idea how you define left and right, liberal and conservative, but i guess that's another matter.
oh, i see the misunderstanding.
my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1. i would only legalize marijuana.
oh, i see the misunderstanding.
my alternatives apply to all illegal drugs with the exception of #1. i would only legalize marijuana.
According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances... Most not all...
According to the National Institute On Drug Abuse marijuana as a "gateway drug." However, most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, "harder" substances... Most not all...
3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.
4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
3. stop spending so much time, money and resources on possession cases.
4. for the possession cases that are made, send them to treatment rather than jail and don't give them criminal convictions just for possession.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html
Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape. You knew it was coming. More government workers. If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it. We might as well just let everyone do what they want.
It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff. That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence. The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha.
It reminds me of stuff like this. https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/
A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them. So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to. Drugs are insanely dumb. All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.
You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi. Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice. Drugs lead to violence.
You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home. If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke. Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-el-chapo-jailbreak-mexico-20150717-story.html
Here it comes today. Seven people arrested either guards or jail employees they did not specify helping him escape. You knew it was coming. More government workers. If they aren't going to enforce the laws why don't they just legalize it. We might as well just let everyone do what they want.
It's funny to me though you guys say drug charges are non violent stuff. That new york guy killed a sheriff that's violence. The guy that got off on cocaine charges killed a cop Omaha.
It reminds me of stuff like this. https://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013/09/feds-slain-dallas-man-had-900000-stashed-in-safes-28-million-in-narcotics-sales-recorded-on-detailed-ledgers.html/
A guy selling drugs gets shot and killed by a guy that watches people working for drug cartels and robs them. So what happens to the guy that robbed him someone shot and killed him to. Drugs are insanely dumb. All they lead to is robberies, murders, and corruption.
You don't see someone say well that guy robbed that house because he drank a pepsi. Or that guy robbed that church because he just smoked a pall mall, or because he just robbed a 7/11 because he was up on orange juice. Drugs lead to violence.
You don't see little Timmy go rob a burger king employee because he has 900,000 dollars of cash in a safe at his home. If they aren't going to enforce the laws then I just say legalize it because what they have going now is honestly a joke. Karma will catch you sooner or later whether it's now or 20 years down the road.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 460,355
- Thursday 10/08/2026 435
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,890
- PART DEUX 151
- TB/BOYS live in game comment welcome 842
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 60,853
- Week 6 Money 8,394
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 36,249
- 🏀😎🥳 NCAA hoops bets hitting over 63% each year for past few seasons!...BUT will this continue? 🤔 ...or regress?? 🤒🤕😧 191,792
- NFL LOCKED IN! 105,243
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
