Posted:
#1
Could your seafood contain toxic chemicals?
Views: 423
Posts: 7
Posted:
#4
I agree wild is the way to go as long as the rivers and lakes are'nt toxic.Alot of the lakes and all the rivers i live around are toxic with pcb's and high levels of mercury.
I agree wild is the way to go as long as the rivers and lakes are'nt toxic.Alot of the lakes and all the rivers i live around are toxic with pcb's and high levels of mercury.
Posted:
#6
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by Nagelan:
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Interesting,i liked orange roughy too.
thanks for the info.
Quote Originally Posted by Nagelan:
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Even wild fish can have high concentrations of chemicals. Typically the older the fish the higher the likelihood of contamination. I read somewhere that fish like orange roughy can have a lifespan of 50+ years.
Your best bet is farm fish with short life spans (trout, tilapia, etc.). Not only is it more sustainable, but it is less toxic.
Interesting,i liked orange roughy too.
thanks for the info.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,077
- Friday 10/30/2026 632
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,628
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 287,559
- BEAT Your book 125,873
- PART DEUX 216
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 6,199
- NFL LOCKED IN! 111,041
- Week 9 Money 9,451
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 24,482
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
