Hawkeye - I tried to help you yesterday with Cal over Afir Force. My point in that post was not the fact you messed up on BYU/Air Force score - but your logic was very flawed. You were basically saying since X beat Y, and since Y beat Z, then X should beat Z. I suggest to you again that is not the way to handicap football, especially college. I see you gfalling into another trap today - nobody has played for a long time at this point. Look at the offenses and defenses and cap those matchup's, look at their health, their QB play, running game, ability to stop the run - those are the things I suggest you start looking at. I cvan tell you are pretty new at thgis, but I see you bet a lot of games so I am trying to help uyou improve ytpour winning percentage. I went 4-1 yesterday for +3200, cashing Cal, Auburn, OK State, the Pisatons, and losing on Orlando by a basket. We plan to keep it rolling today and ended '07 up well over six figiures. Yesterday I suggested to you to take Cal or the Over, both winners. Today I am suggesting take Tennesee here or the Under hawkeye if you must play this game. If I do anything it will probably be a small 2-3 unit play on the Under.
Cal knocked out the QB......then AF missed a 2 point conversion that would have covered by the 1/2 hook toward the end of the game???? They jumped out on that worthless team 21-0........I'm not bitter because I had the over as the larger play........but c'mon.....don't back in the thread with the I told you so on a game like that.........
0
Quote Originally Posted by teabag69:
Hawkeye - I tried to help you yesterday with Cal over Afir Force. My point in that post was not the fact you messed up on BYU/Air Force score - but your logic was very flawed. You were basically saying since X beat Y, and since Y beat Z, then X should beat Z. I suggest to you again that is not the way to handicap football, especially college. I see you gfalling into another trap today - nobody has played for a long time at this point. Look at the offenses and defenses and cap those matchup's, look at their health, their QB play, running game, ability to stop the run - those are the things I suggest you start looking at. I cvan tell you are pretty new at thgis, but I see you bet a lot of games so I am trying to help uyou improve ytpour winning percentage. I went 4-1 yesterday for +3200, cashing Cal, Auburn, OK State, the Pisatons, and losing on Orlando by a basket. We plan to keep it rolling today and ended '07 up well over six figiures. Yesterday I suggested to you to take Cal or the Over, both winners. Today I am suggesting take Tennesee here or the Under hawkeye if you must play this game. If I do anything it will probably be a small 2-3 unit play on the Under.
Cal knocked out the QB......then AF missed a 2 point conversion that would have covered by the 1/2 hook toward the end of the game???? They jumped out on that worthless team 21-0........I'm not bitter because I had the over as the larger play........but c'mon.....don't back in the thread with the I told you so on a game like that.........
Irisheyez, a win is a win baby. I have lost hundreds of gamnes the other way like that - it happens. This is why it is called "gambling", and why I tell people to stop wasting time on bs stats and trends, so much can happen that make them all worthless, and most of them are flawed anyweay because of he conditions and opponents not being identical.
This is not an "I told you so". You atre putting a negative spin on my post. This is simply an attempt to offer advice to a younger, less experienced investor, suggesting he use a more sound and proven handicapping process. I mena really - these people topok Air Force just because of some silly reasoning. They were saying, "well Air Force beat soi and so, and so and so beat Cal, so Air Force must beat Cal." That is not a sound capping approach by any means, I am sure you agree with that. The only reason they were up 21-0 was because Cal didnt give a sh-t, once they did there was no competition. But us sitting here debating that would be a complte waste ofr time - it matters zero, the game is over and Cal won. But again, my focus was not the fact he had a loser, the focus was the process by which he came at the pick - so he does not repeat the same thing again today. You can see the benefit in that I am sure. Your concern is appreciated, mopving forward please try and stay focused on capping the games and not personal comments. All I am doing is offering assistan e, they can take ot or leave it, so I don't know what your commnets accomplish, very little perhaps.
0
Irisheyez, a win is a win baby. I have lost hundreds of gamnes the other way like that - it happens. This is why it is called "gambling", and why I tell people to stop wasting time on bs stats and trends, so much can happen that make them all worthless, and most of them are flawed anyweay because of he conditions and opponents not being identical.
This is not an "I told you so". You atre putting a negative spin on my post. This is simply an attempt to offer advice to a younger, less experienced investor, suggesting he use a more sound and proven handicapping process. I mena really - these people topok Air Force just because of some silly reasoning. They were saying, "well Air Force beat soi and so, and so and so beat Cal, so Air Force must beat Cal." That is not a sound capping approach by any means, I am sure you agree with that. The only reason they were up 21-0 was because Cal didnt give a sh-t, once they did there was no competition. But us sitting here debating that would be a complte waste ofr time - it matters zero, the game is over and Cal won. But again, my focus was not the fact he had a loser, the focus was the process by which he came at the pick - so he does not repeat the same thing again today. You can see the benefit in that I am sure. Your concern is appreciated, mopving forward please try and stay focused on capping the games and not personal comments. All I am doing is offering assistan e, they can take ot or leave it, so I don't know what your commnets accomplish, very little perhaps.
Irisheyez, a win is a win baby. I have lost hundreds of gamnes the other way like that - it happens. This is why it is called "gambling", and why I tell people to stop wasting time on bs stats and trends, so much can happen that make them all worthless, and most of them are flawed anyweay because of he conditions and opponents not being identical.
This is not an "I told you so". You atre putting a negative spin on my post. This is simply an attempt to offer advice to a younger, less experienced investor, suggesting he use a more sound and proven handicapping process. I mena really - these people topok Air Force just because of some silly reasoning. They were saying, "well Air Force beat soi and so, and so and so beat Cal, so Air Force must beat Cal." That is not a sound capping approach by any means, I am sure you agree with that. The only reason they were up 21-0 was because Cal didnt give a sh-t, once they did there was no competition. But us sitting here debating that would be a complte waste ofr time - it matters zero, the game is over and Cal won. But again, my focus was not the fact he had a loser, the focus was the process by which he came at the pick - so he does not repeat the same thing again today. You can see the benefit in that I am sure. Your concern is appreciated, mopving forward please try and stay focused on capping the games and not personal comments. All I am doing is offering assistan e, they can take ot or leave it, so I don't know what your commnets accomplish, very little perhaps.
Alright, I said it in the other thread twice, the so and so, that was me being luppy, and i would never, NEVER, make a pick based off that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by teabag69:
Irisheyez, a win is a win baby. I have lost hundreds of gamnes the other way like that - it happens. This is why it is called "gambling", and why I tell people to stop wasting time on bs stats and trends, so much can happen that make them all worthless, and most of them are flawed anyweay because of he conditions and opponents not being identical.
This is not an "I told you so". You atre putting a negative spin on my post. This is simply an attempt to offer advice to a younger, less experienced investor, suggesting he use a more sound and proven handicapping process. I mena really - these people topok Air Force just because of some silly reasoning. They were saying, "well Air Force beat soi and so, and so and so beat Cal, so Air Force must beat Cal." That is not a sound capping approach by any means, I am sure you agree with that. The only reason they were up 21-0 was because Cal didnt give a sh-t, once they did there was no competition. But us sitting here debating that would be a complte waste ofr time - it matters zero, the game is over and Cal won. But again, my focus was not the fact he had a loser, the focus was the process by which he came at the pick - so he does not repeat the same thing again today. You can see the benefit in that I am sure. Your concern is appreciated, mopving forward please try and stay focused on capping the games and not personal comments. All I am doing is offering assistan e, they can take ot or leave it, so I don't know what your commnets accomplish, very little perhaps.
Alright, I said it in the other thread twice, the so and so, that was me being luppy, and i would never, NEVER, make a pick based off that.
Looks like both defenses have figured out the offenses. The running game may be the winner now. Go Badgers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Looks like both defenses have figured out the offenses. The running game may be the winner now. Go Badgers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can you feel the momentum change? Looks like it's going to be another close one! I love college football!
I am with you 100% CS, I will go into depression next week as CFB completes another season....maybe the best ever. I don't even watch the pros until CFB is over, and then I bet a few times on the playoffs since I only have to study up on a few teams.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CollegeSharp:
Can you feel the momentum change? Looks like it's going to be another close one! I love college football!
I am with you 100% CS, I will go into depression next week as CFB completes another season....maybe the best ever. I don't even watch the pros until CFB is over, and then I bet a few times on the playoffs since I only have to study up on a few teams.
Wisconsin vs. Tennessee -2 (2 units) - no write up for this one, but hey, at least its not the small font right? gotta cater to all those hangovers today
0
Quote Originally Posted by obes728:
Wisconsin vs. Tennessee -2 (2 units) - no write up for this one, but hey, at least its not the small font right? gotta cater to all those hangovers today
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
