All Forums | College Football

Rutgers at Louisville (10/21/2011)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13297
Posts: 81
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 267
Posted: #26
Louisville for the big play

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 41
Posted: #27
rut +2 and under40
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #28
Missed the over on that Zona game.. Hit both on this one Louisville -2 is my play here
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 51
Posted: #29

lou 23               rut 17

lou + under

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 219
Posted: #30

Quote Originally Posted by Ber:

Opening fav that closes as a dog is always the play. Rutgers+2 & ML

Why is that?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 378
Posted: #31

Okay... LLOOONNGGG time covers guy, but I usually stay in the weeds, but this game and line is an absolute joke.  To be honest with you it is kind of similar to last nights game with zona going fron -3 to -5.5 for no reason whatsoever. 

If you see a team that is 1 and whatever going against a team that is 5 and 1 with the public money going on the initial fave and the line reversing????  F"innn light bulbs if I have ever seen em'... 

Going the Ville ML at -130...

Not huge, but big enough... Risking whatever to win a nickel..

When you see spreads move like this for no apparent reason you can not fight against the tape.

Good luck Gentlemen..

 

BTW..  Is that post legit in MLB with the kid who bet whatever on STL at 40000???"??  I would be sh*tting my pants with every pitch...lol

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 348
Posted: #32
I think I'm going with L'Ville here just because the scoring margin in similar games against similar teams:

Both teams played NCar, Rutgers came the closest to beating NCar. I know offensively, the L'Ville was playing with a backup QB which may push me in their favor. But what is pushing me most towards L'Ville the most is their QB and the run game (Pead). Look for a balanced attack vs. Rutgers and to put them off balance. Pead will run for a break away if they try to blitz.

L'ville -2, staying away from O/U due to run and defenses. L'Ville by 5 is my prediction because they're home and they have a balanced attack. Rutger's run game is pretty piss poor IMO.

Running a big parlay:
L'Ville -2
WVU -14
WVU over 59

50 to win 600

BOL all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 348
Posted: #33
300...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 378
Posted: #34
pcz.. stay away from wv..  going to hurt you . Look at their away scoring margin average in the past...  Not very strong whatsoever.   I am an upstate NY guy and they are treating this game like a superbowl..  Going to be a tight disgusting football game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 348
Posted: #35
I just think syr d isn't enough and wvu won't get embarrassed on national television... Too many close games last weekend for ranked teams. Solid wins but I think they win it by 16. Already put in my bet lol.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 4801
Posted: #36
Bridgewater adds a run element that helps Louisville.. I watched that game they had against NC.. I got moosed at the end by that late Louisville TD.. Their defense is better then people think.. After facing Cincy, Rutgers offense should be nothing.. Louisville usually plays pretty good at home, especially on primetime..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 1213
Posted: #37
Louisville it is...simply due to the line movement...and Pead...GLTA

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4491
Posted: #38

F' the side................I'll GAMBLE on the over !!

Both squads are under person 1-5 & 0-5 O/U so far............that being said, the last 5 match-ups between the 2 have all flown over.

OVER 40 for me.................C'mon man!

GL Y'all

-Whale

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16
Posted: #39
But what is pushing me most towards L'Ville the most is their QB and the run game (Pead). Look for a balanced attack vs. Rutgers and to put them off balance. Pead will run for a break away if they try to blitz.  PER PCZ,, NEXT,,,Louisville it is...simply due to the line movement...and Pead...GLTA
PER ,,, RAUCHY76,       DUDES !! PEAD PLAYS FOR CINCY !! PUT DOWN THE WHATEVER IT IS YOUR DRINKING !!      LMAO !   JUST TRYING TO HELP MY BROS OUT A BIT . GLTA
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 362
Posted: #40

RUTGERS + 2

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 45
Posted: #41
why is louisville getting all the love . they only scored 3 offensive tds in the last 12 quarters of play .how are they going to score ? I think this comes down to who can make playes in the passing game and ill go with rutgers +2,
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 65
Posted: #42
louisville defense is much better than rutgers, this is why the line is so low and the over/under as well... NC has a way better run game than RUTGERS and Louy was in it the whole game. Louy will be up for a primetime game in front of home crowd. gonna be a tough one for both.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 2
Posted: #43
too much wierd line movement and non movement for me but im taking the under at 40. only way i see losing is if its 24-17
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 716
Posted: #44

Only home game Louisville has won this season was vs. Murray St. (21-9).

Friday night lights.....so what.  Louisville lost to FIU 17-24 under the lights on 10/9.

Forget all this line movement crap.  Vegas doesn't care about giving you an easy Friday night win.  You'll give it all back and then some tomorrow anyway.

                                       RUTGERS + 1

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 115
Posted: #45
RUTGERS BIG!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 348
Posted: #46
Oh crap lol I was looking at the wrong column/wrong match up. But I think with Stein back, they have a better chance anyway. Their D is pretty tough. BOL Something's fishy, too good to be true to give Rutgers points.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1204
Posted: #47
R +1
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 29
Posted: #48
R +1

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 16293
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by vinmoney:

Okay... LLOOONNGGG time covers guy, but I usually stay in the weeds, but this game and line is an absolute joke.  To be honest with you it is kind of similar to last nights game with zona going fron -3 to -5.5 for no reason whatsoever. 

If you see a team that is 1 and whatever going against a team that is 5 and 1 with the public money going on the initial fave and the line reversing????  F"innn light bulbs if I have ever seen em'... 

Going the Ville ML at -130...

Not huge, but big enough... Risking whatever to win a nickel..

When you see spreads move like this for no apparent reason you can not fight against the tape.

Good luck Gentlemen..

 

BTW..  Is that post legit in MLB with the kid who bet whatever on STL at 40000???"??  I would be sh*tting my pants with every pitch...lol

Good stuff Bucci

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 915
Posted: #50
There is no rational explanation for Louisville to be favored therfore the Ville.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.