All Forums | College Football

Central Michigan at Northern Illinois (11/12/2008)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7199
Posts: 163
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 75
Posted: #51
I'm not a big poster - just a big winner.  I actually don't play over unders - I don't enjoy those types of bets.  I'm more a spread player.

It's all good though - because to the point at hand, I noticed you were bullish on Arizona on MNF as well as Ball St last nite.  Your posts are very "bookie-ish".

Anyways, lets make it a wednesday trifecta on betting against the Fpronk - and no better way to do that than with the Chippi WAZ.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #52

You may not be a big poster but if you have been following my plays since I started posting since the end of September then you have been a BIG LOSER. I ALWAYS post my losses as well...I don't just show my winners...and my posts are my opinion and are in no way bookie-ish...matter of fact your posts are girl-ish...go against me...if I win I wont see or hear from you again...typical AHOLE poster. Apparently you're a Central Michigan fan...especially with that cute little spelling. GOOD LUCK IN LIFE LOSER...YOU NEED IT!

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 75
Posted: #53
Step one: Grow up (stop taking my antics personally)

Step two: Stop following the public and favorites (go against the grain)

Step three (you're not gonna like this, but will hopefully learn from it): Central Michigan (+3.5) tonite

No, I'm not a Central Michigan fan, but a TEXAS fan.  But, big winner all the same.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #54
Missy,
 
Step one:: If you don't like me defending myself the STFU and stop posting crap that is inaccurate! Of course I take it personally you dumb ass, you're attacking me..DOH!
 
Step two:: I don't always bet the CHALK loser...look at the links I just posted up above...NEV..DOG, STEELERS DOG, matter of fact if you even looked at my posts I am more than likely betting the DOG. Damn, you are a empty headed.
 
Step three :: NIU -2.5, UNDER 49.5, and Kent State +1.5
 
 
 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #55

Oh, and most importantly STEP FOUR!!

MAN UP AND MAKE YOUR POSTS PUBLIC...OTHERWISE SEE STEP ONE....and STFU!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22590
Posted: #56
pronk it reminds me of something u say. its guys like him that make you more confident in the plays. 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 75
Posted: #57
Yes - this is very entertaining.  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 8093
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by mbanglaw:

I just do the opposite of what FPronk says and then count my money.

One bad night won't make one worst handicapping to me.....

IMO...Fponk is one of solid around here!

Good luck to all

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 49
Posted: #59

everyone just need to grow up and we need to focus on how we can all make some money tonight...reading these posts reminds me more of a myspace covo betweek 14 year olds than a wagerline convo about sports betting...

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 75
Posted: #60
I just think it's so funny how much analysis you guys put into this with regards to teams playing at night, the weather, etc. - when Vegas has already done all the work for you - you just need to take the bigger risk.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 8330
Posted: #61
 
Oh Well! this thread started off useful and only to end up AFU.
 
Think that's a sign for me to lay off this game.
 
Good luck to everyone on this game
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #62

I think its funny how none of your posts are public but you criticize everyone…Online forums weren’t created for adults who were picked on as kids to come in and try and get back at the world. Covers is here so bettorscan give each other advice and give opinions on games. Either give your opinion on the game or don’t post. Seriously, I am sorry you were picked on a little kid but move on…

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 24
Posted: #63
These MAC games SUCK and are 2nd rate college ball. Will wait until Sat and play some real games.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 75
Posted: #64
Fairly 

Poor 
Retards 
ramble 
On 
Never 
Knowing

and the beat goes on...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #65
How long did that take?
 
Thank you for the kind words...and for showing your own ignorance.
 
Hugs and Kisses mbanglaw.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 149
Posted: #66
All of you tards ripping on Fpronk have no background or proof of winning shit. Put up some numbers or shut up!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 11
Posted: #67
don't think it mattters  who starts tontie lefevour or brunner i think the better team here is getting points        

34- 17     Central Mich
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

I don't care who you play...when you're allowing 9 points a game at home...that's good DEF. However, CM is averaging approx. 27 points a game on the road...downside...they give up about 35 points on the road and NIU scores 30.
 
That's weird.  Isn't that what this gambling business is all about....who a team is playing?  I think you are justifying your bet here.  I'm not saying N Ill isn't capable of playing good defense, but I have a hard time calling a defense good when they just got lit up for 45 points.  Also, C Michigan managed 35 points against this defense last year.  You can argue it was an inflated score from turnovers but don't forget C Michigan went into conservative mode when they got the big lead. 
 
Point being, I'm pretty sure C Michigan's offense is considerably better than any of the teams N Ill has held to such low points.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #69
45 points on the road to a top 15 team is different the getting getting lit up like that at home which they have not done. Again, the game you mention last year was at Central Michigan...and that was last year but if you're bring up historical games why not mention the 2006 team that lit CM for 31 points...its just as relevant or shall I say irrelevant as your comment. I think you are justifying your bet.
 
Yes, those are the stats and scores but its also my OPINION...it doesn't justify my bet its actually what makes me think NIU covers. There is a difference....I don't write stuff to justify my pick..I write to discuss why I am making my pick.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 523
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

 

You've been hot as of late. Nice call in last night's game I sure wish I would have followed. However, I am looking at following tonight.

thanks man GL, don't worry about that crazy fcker in this thread

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #71
I understand the argument that N Ill should play well because they are coming off a loss that they didn't play very well in.  If it were me, I wouldn't try to argue a point that was just proven to be false.  N Ill defense is not good.  They may be capable of playing well, but they aren't good.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1718
Posted: #72
Quote Originally Posted by mbanglaw:

I just do the opposite of what FPronk says and then count my money.

IMO I think he has a clue....Which cannot be said about U
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1718
Posted: #73
Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyhpd:

 
Oh Well! this thread started off useful and only to end up AFU.
 
Think that's a sign for me to lay off this game.
 
Good luck to everyone on this game

BIG D I like your style...I am just going to play a small under parlay in both games and relax...
No stress tonight boys...Blew up an exacta at Aqueduct today to make up for my transgressions. (ZONA, BALL ST)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1509
Posted: #74
even though no. ill qb looked bad vs ball state last out, just no way can i support this cmu D on the road vs a very good running squad in no. ill ... look for back brown to have a big night and qb chandler harnish to move the chains with his mobilty, while no .ill top rated D with NFL  linemen larry english puts a lot of heat on the qbs of cmu .... no ill-  38----20  
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #75
Quote Originally Posted by DtotheP:

I understand the argument that N Ill should play well because they are coming off a loss that they didn't play very well in.  If it were me, I wouldn't try to argue a point that was just proven to be false.  N Ill defense is not good.  They may be capable of playing well, but they aren't good.
 

For the record I was not proven wrong but....

I'll handle you like I handle my wife...Yes, you are a right, you are my hero....I figured you need to hear this in order to stop arguing your opinion with me.

Move on DtotheP. Why went I post my opinion every ahole on covers finds me..its my opinion and its what I like...geez.

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.