let's see I have him figured out yet ![]()
let's see I have him figured out yet ![]()
Glad I wasted my time rationalizing with a Clemson fan..."I make no aplologies for who I am or what I say". Give me a fucking break. That's so cliche'. Good luck with that attitude in the real world.
Anywho, thanks for laying the "truth" on me and treating me the way I should be treated . ![]()
Ugh, man I'm so off subject today...
Thoughts on getting money back on ECU vs Memphis this weekend? Imo, its a good spot to lay road chalk with ECU vs a terrible Memphis squad. Its a sucker line for public backers who just saw Houston destroy ECU on the road. My last rationale for playing ECU (vs Houston, huge fail) was their gauntlet of a schedule with VT, UNC, SC, and Houston as their early slate...Maybe I picked the wrong week. Imo, this is it...
Was leaning SDSU tonight as well, but a short week preparing for that triple option may actually play into AFs card here...Air Force couldnt stop anyone though, may look at the square ass over.
Hope you jump on Cal. Need the feeling that someone else will be on it here. Starting the weekend + money is just the tops...
![]()
Glad I wasted my time rationalizing with a Clemson fan..."I make no aplologies for who I am or what I say". Give me a fucking break. That's so cliche'. Good luck with that attitude in the real world.
Anywho, thanks for laying the "truth" on me and treating me the way I should be treated . ![]()
Ugh, man I'm so off subject today...
Thoughts on getting money back on ECU vs Memphis this weekend? Imo, its a good spot to lay road chalk with ECU vs a terrible Memphis squad. Its a sucker line for public backers who just saw Houston destroy ECU on the road. My last rationale for playing ECU (vs Houston, huge fail) was their gauntlet of a schedule with VT, UNC, SC, and Houston as their early slate...Maybe I picked the wrong week. Imo, this is it...
Was leaning SDSU tonight as well, but a short week preparing for that triple option may actually play into AFs card here...Air Force couldnt stop anyone though, may look at the square ass over.
Hope you jump on Cal. Need the feeling that someone else will be on it here. Starting the weekend + money is just the tops...
![]()
Ugh, it was a bit of an asshole comment by me. I'll shut the fuck up in a minute; right after I talk about your plays. Bitch. J/k man, I'm over it.
Took a peak at your plays. I like em all but Clemson, and will steer clear of the VT/Wake game. Had Wake lost in a squeeker to FSU I would be on Wake here with prolly a better line than the 7 offered. Just feel like the secret is out on Wake, you may be on the right side here. No play imo..
Love Texas. OSUs defense is atrocious. You cant beat getting Texas being over a TD dog at home after they were embarrased in their rivalry game. Principle alone makes me bet this. Every sqaurish bettor in the universe is gonna hit OSU...
Agreed w/ yall on UCF.
Was leaning Ville at +17, but I feel like they were lucky to not have been beat by more by the Heels. Rumor has it Louiville's defense caught onto UNCs signal/play calling first half, hence the lack of progress by UNC the first half. Once this was noticed by half, the Heels coulda/shoulda pulled away by more 2nd half. That garbage TD was simply due to UNCs lame ass prevent defense which as BURNED them many times in the past...That said, I was still impressed vy Villes defense, maybe they keep it close here...
Baylors gonna be a shoot out. No opinion on your totals. Im not a totals guy...
There, a discussion w/out Clemson or bickering. Just to make 7774 happy as he is an integral part of discussion in this thread ![]()
![]()
Ugh, it was a bit of an asshole comment by me. I'll shut the fuck up in a minute; right after I talk about your plays. Bitch. J/k man, I'm over it.
Took a peak at your plays. I like em all but Clemson, and will steer clear of the VT/Wake game. Had Wake lost in a squeeker to FSU I would be on Wake here with prolly a better line than the 7 offered. Just feel like the secret is out on Wake, you may be on the right side here. No play imo..
Love Texas. OSUs defense is atrocious. You cant beat getting Texas being over a TD dog at home after they were embarrased in their rivalry game. Principle alone makes me bet this. Every sqaurish bettor in the universe is gonna hit OSU...
Agreed w/ yall on UCF.
Was leaning Ville at +17, but I feel like they were lucky to not have been beat by more by the Heels. Rumor has it Louiville's defense caught onto UNCs signal/play calling first half, hence the lack of progress by UNC the first half. Once this was noticed by half, the Heels coulda/shoulda pulled away by more 2nd half. That garbage TD was simply due to UNCs lame ass prevent defense which as BURNED them many times in the past...That said, I was still impressed vy Villes defense, maybe they keep it close here...
Baylors gonna be a shoot out. No opinion on your totals. Im not a totals guy...
There, a discussion w/out Clemson or bickering. Just to make 7774 happy as he is an integral part of discussion in this thread ![]()
![]()
Thoughts on getting money back on ECU vs Memphis this weekend? Imo, its a good spot to lay road chalk with ECU vs a terrible Memphis squad. Its a sucker line for public backers who just saw Houston destroy ECU on the road. My last rationale for playing ECU (vs Houston, huge fail) was their gauntlet of a schedule with VT, UNC, SC, and Houston as their early slate...Maybe I picked the wrong week. Imo, this is it...
ECU has covered 14 of the last 15 vs. Memphis, FWIW
![]()
Thoughts on getting money back on ECU vs Memphis this weekend? Imo, its a good spot to lay road chalk with ECU vs a terrible Memphis squad. Its a sucker line for public backers who just saw Houston destroy ECU on the road. My last rationale for playing ECU (vs Houston, huge fail) was their gauntlet of a schedule with VT, UNC, SC, and Houston as their early slate...Maybe I picked the wrong week. Imo, this is it...
ECU has covered 14 of the last 15 vs. Memphis, FWIW
![]()
Me too, but realistically 2 dogs aren't covering on a Thursday night doubleheader. Thinking Cali may be a bit undervalued against the Lame Kiffin crew, but AFA will likely run their way to a high-scoring cover over a very disappointing SDSU team.
AFA/SDSU should hit the 60's and over is the right play.
It's now or never for Cal to get that elusive win vs. USC and I believe they'll do it.
Me too, but realistically 2 dogs aren't covering on a Thursday night doubleheader. Thinking Cali may be a bit undervalued against the Lame Kiffin crew, but AFA will likely run their way to a high-scoring cover over a very disappointing SDSU team.
AFA/SDSU should hit the 60's and over is the right play.
It's now or never for Cal to get that elusive win vs. USC and I believe they'll do it.
Me too, but realistically 2 dogs aren't covering on a Thursday night doubleheader. Thinking Cali may be a bit undervalued against the Lame Kiffin crew, but AFA will likely run their way to a high-scoring cover over a very disappointing SDSU team.
AFA/SDSU should hit the 60's and over is the right play.
It's now or never for Cal to get that elusive win vs. USC and I believe they'll do it.
Me too, but realistically 2 dogs aren't covering on a Thursday night doubleheader. Thinking Cali may be a bit undervalued against the Lame Kiffin crew, but AFA will likely run their way to a high-scoring cover over a very disappointing SDSU team.
AFA/SDSU should hit the 60's and over is the right play.
It's now or never for Cal to get that elusive win vs. USC and I believe they'll do it.
I wouldn't fear either of these teams' offenses. The series history is chock full of unders and I think that'll continue. Good Luck with whatever you play. I'm only betting the Air Force/San Diego Over 59 tonite.
I wouldn't fear either of these teams' offenses. The series history is chock full of unders and I think that'll continue. Good Luck with whatever you play. I'm only betting the Air Force/San Diego Over 59 tonite.
let's see I have him figured out yet ![]()
let's see I have him figured out yet ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.