Ugh, Sparty sucks. Couldn't have been less impressive in knocking off tOSU two weeks ago. The opportunity to successfully fade Michigan away from the Big House was last week...and hell, even then, they found a way to cover. Big motivation with the new head man after three straight losses to MSU under Rich Rod, and personal revenge for Denard after one of his worst showings of the year in this game last year. Line move is correct here...Wolverines take it.
0
Ugh, Sparty sucks. Couldn't have been less impressive in knocking off tOSU two weeks ago. The opportunity to successfully fade Michigan away from the Big House was last week...and hell, even then, they found a way to cover. Big motivation with the new head man after three straight losses to MSU under Rich Rod, and personal revenge for Denard after one of his worst showings of the year in this game last year. Line move is correct here...Wolverines take it.
RJ... noticed you were big on BC last week.You say Clemson snuck out a cover?? Boyd went down 3 minutes into the 2nd half. Clemson was dominating BC... It wasnt even close, If Boyd stayed in the game Clemson would have won by 40. they did cover the 21 with a back up for the entire 2nd half and pretty much ran the ball the whole time. So I dont think in any way or fashion Clemson Snuck out a cover. BTW..... GL to you if you take Maryland. But in my opinion, Clemson will destroy Maryland
You like Clemson this weekend? Huge shocker. The world must look pretty orange in those shades...
Great call on Clemson last weekend, and the week before, and before, and before...and good luck on them this weekend, and next weekend, and next weekend, and next weekend, " ".....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
RJ... noticed you were big on BC last week.You say Clemson snuck out a cover?? Boyd went down 3 minutes into the 2nd half. Clemson was dominating BC... It wasnt even close, If Boyd stayed in the game Clemson would have won by 40. they did cover the 21 with a back up for the entire 2nd half and pretty much ran the ball the whole time. So I dont think in any way or fashion Clemson Snuck out a cover. BTW..... GL to you if you take Maryland. But in my opinion, Clemson will destroy Maryland
You like Clemson this weekend? Huge shocker. The world must look pretty orange in those shades...
Great call on Clemson last weekend, and the week before, and before, and before...and good luck on them this weekend, and next weekend, and next weekend, and next weekend, " ".....
LOVE UVA this week. @ weeks to prepare. Throw out the 2 weeks option practices and I'm still on UVA...They will grind this game out...Keep GTs offense off the field with long, pounding drives...
Heels. Glad to see you on them. Lackluster game by UNC last weekend, I see the Heels moving the ball pretty good here. HATE the noon start though...Takes a lil atmosphere out of the game..
Clemson is a tough game. Really would like the +8 here. This line should settle back here after that run...
Liking Cal after they sat the bed in Oregon. QB should be healed up OK...
Duke could be a good call. Would have been better if at least FSU had won the Wake game...
Love Tejas at home getting 8 after their huge embarrasment..
GL bud.
0
Solid looking card...
Really like some spots this week...
LOVE UVA this week. @ weeks to prepare. Throw out the 2 weeks option practices and I'm still on UVA...They will grind this game out...Keep GTs offense off the field with long, pounding drives...
Heels. Glad to see you on them. Lackluster game by UNC last weekend, I see the Heels moving the ball pretty good here. HATE the noon start though...Takes a lil atmosphere out of the game..
Clemson is a tough game. Really would like the +8 here. This line should settle back here after that run...
Liking Cal after they sat the bed in Oregon. QB should be healed up OK...
Duke could be a good call. Would have been better if at least FSU had won the Wake game...
Love Tejas at home getting 8 after their huge embarrasment..
Love Cal at home against USC. Think they are going to be able to pass at-will here. - Taking the over!
Dont see how UNC does anything other than lay an ass-whipping on the Canes. No problem laying 3 when I should be laying a TD. - Have been debating on this game all week, you just sold me, let's do it!
Banging Maryland. Clemson snuck a cover out of that BC game and I really think this line is sort of heavy. - On the other side here.
UVA has had plenty of time to prepare for the option. GT cant pass, at all. UVA is worth a look on the ML as well. - Other side here as well... A lot of people are fading Ga tech because of the past few weeks screw ups. I am not one of them. I think they are about to bounce back strong.
I remember when everyone was blowing MSU, then they lose SU at Auburn and shit themselves against LSU. They are off the radar and shouldnt be. They beat South Carolina. - They are off the radar because they suck man. I have watched them week in, and week out. There are no where near SC talent wise right now. And now that Garcia is gone, this team is about to become a vicious two headed monster on offense, and take the east by storm.
Thought I would have to lay 10 with A&M. Will gladly lay anything less. - RG3 enough said... AnM showed how exposed they are to a good passing game against Arkansas. They will make me want to poke my eyes out with a rusty nail before half time, but Baylor will cover the +9 for me in the second half I am feeling. AM first half bet is looking nice here...
Think UF goes into Auburn and wins. - Really tough call here.... Depends on which Auburn team shows up. I am kinda liking the under in this one. Neither team really has a solid identity on offense right now. However, they both have explosive play capabilities, and I am sure both will break off that long run once or twice in the game, but neither team can pass, that it why I think it remains under the total.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RJSizzle:
Love Cal at home against USC. Think they are going to be able to pass at-will here. - Taking the over!
Dont see how UNC does anything other than lay an ass-whipping on the Canes. No problem laying 3 when I should be laying a TD. - Have been debating on this game all week, you just sold me, let's do it!
Banging Maryland. Clemson snuck a cover out of that BC game and I really think this line is sort of heavy. - On the other side here.
UVA has had plenty of time to prepare for the option. GT cant pass, at all. UVA is worth a look on the ML as well. - Other side here as well... A lot of people are fading Ga tech because of the past few weeks screw ups. I am not one of them. I think they are about to bounce back strong.
I remember when everyone was blowing MSU, then they lose SU at Auburn and shit themselves against LSU. They are off the radar and shouldnt be. They beat South Carolina. - They are off the radar because they suck man. I have watched them week in, and week out. There are no where near SC talent wise right now. And now that Garcia is gone, this team is about to become a vicious two headed monster on offense, and take the east by storm.
Thought I would have to lay 10 with A&M. Will gladly lay anything less. - RG3 enough said... AnM showed how exposed they are to a good passing game against Arkansas. They will make me want to poke my eyes out with a rusty nail before half time, but Baylor will cover the +9 for me in the second half I am feeling. AM first half bet is looking nice here...
Think UF goes into Auburn and wins. - Really tough call here.... Depends on which Auburn team shows up. I am kinda liking the under in this one. Neither team really has a solid identity on offense right now. However, they both have explosive play capabilities, and I am sure both will break off that long run once or twice in the game, but neither team can pass, that it why I think it remains under the total.
You obviously dont know me our my betting style when oit comes to clemson. I rarely through the years bet on clemson. But I'm really accurate when I do.this season clemson has been a money printing machine if you havent noticed.
But I guess you think I'm just some dumb fan who only bets on there team every week.wrong!!!!
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
0
Lucrative......
You obviously dont know me our my betting style when oit comes to clemson. I rarely through the years bet on clemson. But I'm really accurate when I do.this season clemson has been a money printing machine if you havent noticed.
But I guess you think I'm just some dumb fan who only bets on there team every week.wrong!!!!
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
You obviously dont know me our my betting style when oit comes to clemson. I rarely through the years bet on clemson. But I'm really accurate when I do.this season clemson has been a money printing machine if you havent noticed.
But I guess you think I'm just some dumb fan who only bets on there team every week.wrong!!!!
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
Calm down Boom Boom. Take a breath. I'll try to word this delicately because you seem like you're about to fly off the handle...
Maybe I am clueless, but yes, the way you came into the thread it appears that YOU took offense to RJs comment that Clemson snuck in a cover. This came across homerish and that you took it as an insult vs beloved Clemson...After losing 10 units I doubt he wants to hear you tell him he's wrong about how Clemson covered.
Do I think they snuck in the cover? Maybe, maybe not. With Boyd in the game BC was most likely toast on the +21 line. Without him, BC scored and then Clemson scored to cover by ONE point. So (not speaking for RJ), it appeared that Clemson "snuck" in with a cover. That's my take. Luckily, my local had +22, and I consider it a lucky push.
In the later comment, you didnt offer insight that Clemson would cover against Maryland. You just assured that Clemson would "destroy" Maryland followed with a handshake. Again, appeared a lil homerish.
You may have your reasons why Clemson will cover against Maryland. But coming into threads with CLEMSON painted all over you and then getting heated when someone questions you only adds to people not taking your opinion seriously...I saw a past thread of yours where you were pretty animated in backing Clemson. It seemed personal.
Either way, good luck with your Clemson play this weekend. Arguments can be made for either side, thats why we are here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
Lucrative......
You obviously dont know me our my betting style when oit comes to clemson. I rarely through the years bet on clemson. But I'm really accurate when I do.this season clemson has been a money printing machine if you havent noticed.
But I guess you think I'm just some dumb fan who only bets on there team every week.wrong!!!!
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
Calm down Boom Boom. Take a breath. I'll try to word this delicately because you seem like you're about to fly off the handle...
Maybe I am clueless, but yes, the way you came into the thread it appears that YOU took offense to RJs comment that Clemson snuck in a cover. This came across homerish and that you took it as an insult vs beloved Clemson...After losing 10 units I doubt he wants to hear you tell him he's wrong about how Clemson covered.
Do I think they snuck in the cover? Maybe, maybe not. With Boyd in the game BC was most likely toast on the +21 line. Without him, BC scored and then Clemson scored to cover by ONE point. So (not speaking for RJ), it appeared that Clemson "snuck" in with a cover. That's my take. Luckily, my local had +22, and I consider it a lucky push.
In the later comment, you didnt offer insight that Clemson would cover against Maryland. You just assured that Clemson would "destroy" Maryland followed with a handshake. Again, appeared a lil homerish.
You may have your reasons why Clemson will cover against Maryland. But coming into threads with CLEMSON painted all over you and then getting heated when someone questions you only adds to people not taking your opinion seriously...I saw a past thread of yours where you were pretty animated in backing Clemson. It seemed personal.
Either way, good luck with your Clemson play this weekend. Arguments can be made for either side, thats why we are here.
The problem Boom is Clemson is 5-0 ATS. The Clemson train is about to die, just like most after a 5-0 run. Clemson will not go 12-0 ATS.
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
I promised Dabo would lose a game for Clemson that no one sees coming---wouldn't be surprised to see this being it. Tough to raw raw a mediocre opponent on the road with UNC and GaTech on deck.
0
The problem Boom is Clemson is 5-0 ATS. The Clemson train is about to die, just like most after a 5-0 run. Clemson will not go 12-0 ATS.
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
I promised Dabo would lose a game for Clemson that no one sees coming---wouldn't be surprised to see this being it. Tough to raw raw a mediocre opponent on the road with UNC and GaTech on deck.
The problem Boom is Clemson is 5-0 ATS. The Clemson train is about to die, just like most after a 5-0 run. Clemson will not go 12-0 ATS.
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
I promised Dabo would lose a game for Clemson that no one sees coming---wouldn't be surprised to see this being it. Tough to raw raw a mediocre opponent on the road with UNC and GaTech on deck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kroch:
The problem Boom is Clemson is 5-0 ATS. The Clemson train is about to die, just like most after a 5-0 run. Clemson will not go 12-0 ATS.
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
I promised Dabo would lose a game for Clemson that no one sees coming---wouldn't be surprised to see this being it. Tough to raw raw a mediocre opponent on the road with UNC and GaTech on deck.
You may have your reasons why Clemson will cover against Maryland. But coming into threads with CLEMSON painted all over you and then getting heated when someone questions you only adds to people not taking your opinion seriously...I saw a past thread of yours where you were pretty animated in backing Clemson. It seemed personal.
yea Boom... people around here don't take your opinion seriously...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lucrative:
You may have your reasons why Clemson will cover against Maryland. But coming into threads with CLEMSON painted all over you and then getting heated when someone questions you only adds to people not taking your opinion seriously...I saw a past thread of yours where you were pretty animated in backing Clemson. It seemed personal.
yea Boom... people around here don't take your opinion seriously...
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
Please elaborate. Do road faves cover less in conference play? Is there any statistical proof that says laying 8 on the road in October and November is unprofitable?
0
Quote Originally Posted by kroch:
And laying 8 on the road in conference is a recipe to stop that run.
Please elaborate. Do road faves cover less in conference play? Is there any statistical proof that says laying 8 on the road in October and November is unprofitable?
back to RJ's thread---does that Baylor line seem like sucker line of the week or what? People keep remembering that TCU/Baylor game and that was a month ago.
Thoughts on Wazzoo? Homecoming, first time back home for a month. They really should have beat UCLA last week. Line seems a shade low imo.
The other line that strikes me odd is Oregon -14. Against the preseason darkhorse favorite from every ESPN analyst. No James. Hmm. Line must reflect night game in Autzen more than anything.
0
I won't say anymore either either Boom.
back to RJ's thread---does that Baylor line seem like sucker line of the week or what? People keep remembering that TCU/Baylor game and that was a month ago.
Thoughts on Wazzoo? Homecoming, first time back home for a month. They really should have beat UCLA last week. Line seems a shade low imo.
The other line that strikes me odd is Oregon -14. Against the preseason darkhorse favorite from every ESPN analyst. No James. Hmm. Line must reflect night game in Autzen more than anything.
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
Jesus, Boom. The kid comes in, explains his point eloquently and this is how you treat him? Really disappointed.
He clearly comes in respecting you. He speaks well. You still resort to shit you would like you were speaking to some fucking schmuck like ManassaMauler or JavierVasquez. Give someone you might not agree with some respect.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
If you dont like what I have to say, then don't fucking read it.... But most importantly don't act like I'm some sort of idiot.
Trust me when I say this......I'm not the clueless one here. It's you.
Jesus, Boom. The kid comes in, explains his point eloquently and this is how you treat him? Really disappointed.
He clearly comes in respecting you. He speaks well. You still resort to shit you would like you were speaking to some fucking schmuck like ManassaMauler or JavierVasquez. Give someone you might not agree with some respect.
back to RJ's thread---does that Baylor line seem like sucker line of the week or what? People keep remembering that TCU/Baylor game and that was a month ago.
Thoughts on Wazzoo? Homecoming, first time back home for a month. They really should have beat UCLA last week. Line seems a shade low imo.
The other line that strikes me odd is Oregon -14. Against the preseason darkhorse favorite from every ESPN analyst. No James. Hmm. Line must reflect night game in Autzen more than anything.
I would make a bet that anyone who bets Baylor was on either Air Force or Navy last week.
Wazzu probably covers.
Oregon is only -14? I banged ASU @ 16 less than 12 hours ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kroch:
I won't say anymore either either Boom.
back to RJ's thread---does that Baylor line seem like sucker line of the week or what? People keep remembering that TCU/Baylor game and that was a month ago.
Thoughts on Wazzoo? Homecoming, first time back home for a month. They really should have beat UCLA last week. Line seems a shade low imo.
The other line that strikes me odd is Oregon -14. Against the preseason darkhorse favorite from every ESPN analyst. No James. Hmm. Line must reflect night game in Autzen more than anything.
I would make a bet that anyone who bets Baylor was on either Air Force or Navy last week.
Wazzu probably covers.
Oregon is only -14? I banged ASU @ 16 less than 12 hours ago.
Rj knows me, he knew I wasn't here to make a stab at his loss from the BC game. But I wanted to correct you before you got any further.
Never took it as a stab. I just called it a snuck cover because it was a 22pt game forever.
You know I would hose down Clemson. We were the ones betting on them after the Wofford game when nobody else would. I was the one telling people Clemson was National Champion material. You were right there with me telling everyone about Ellington etc. This was fucking weeks ago. We both love this years Clemson team and with you being a homer, sometimes people skew the fact you actually can take those orange glasses off.
BUT, motherfucker, lol. After cashing on Clemson, I vow that I will cash against them. And so will my close fried Lucrative. It will come Saturday night when they lose in Maryland.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
Rj knows me, he knew I wasn't here to make a stab at his loss from the BC game. But I wanted to correct you before you got any further.
Never took it as a stab. I just called it a snuck cover because it was a 22pt game forever.
You know I would hose down Clemson. We were the ones betting on them after the Wofford game when nobody else would. I was the one telling people Clemson was National Champion material. You were right there with me telling everyone about Ellington etc. This was fucking weeks ago. We both love this years Clemson team and with you being a homer, sometimes people skew the fact you actually can take those orange glasses off.
BUT, motherfucker, lol. After cashing on Clemson, I vow that I will cash against them. And so will my close fried Lucrative. It will come Saturday night when they lose in Maryland.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
