ugh... why did i say Dez White... that guy was no good... Dez Bryant of course... i'm sure you knew that...
i was only talking about who is better this year... Dez has the extra year of experience and i think it shows... he is very polished... has been drawing comparisons to Jerry Rice, and you can see why... amazing hands, great route running, and totally fearless over the middle...
as far as their future careers, i think both are sure thing studs in the NFL...
0
ugh... why did i say Dez White... that guy was no good... Dez Bryant of course... i'm sure you knew that...
i was only talking about who is better this year... Dez has the extra year of experience and i think it shows... he is very polished... has been drawing comparisons to Jerry Rice, and you can see why... amazing hands, great route running, and totally fearless over the middle...
as far as their future careers, i think both are sure thing studs in the NFL...
I am a little hesitant about the USC/Ohio St game. The most logical play would be for USC to cover the 7, which is where the number is at on sportsbook. I mean they beat a shitty San Diego St team 56-3 and Ohio St just snuck past Navy at home 31-27. I mean they were a two point conversion away from being tied late in the 4th quarter. So there's no way the Buckeye's can stay with the Trojans right, WRONG!
I am taking Ohio St +7 or better and maybe even ML too. I feel more confident about this pick since St had a scare against Navy. They are going come out firing next week, at HOME, and not let up in the second half.
0
I am a little hesitant about the USC/Ohio St game. The most logical play would be for USC to cover the 7, which is where the number is at on sportsbook. I mean they beat a shitty San Diego St team 56-3 and Ohio St just snuck past Navy at home 31-27. I mean they were a two point conversion away from being tied late in the 4th quarter. So there's no way the Buckeye's can stay with the Trojans right, WRONG!
I am taking Ohio St +7 or better and maybe even ML too. I feel more confident about this pick since St had a scare against Navy. They are going come out firing next week, at HOME, and not let up in the second half.
They beat San Jose State, and yes there is a difference.
Im taking USC for 10 units ML... Im doing it, already in stone. I dont want to hear any opinions otherwise, it is a true life lock. Ice, if u ever wanted to double up do it now with the ML bud....
0
They beat San Jose State, and yes there is a difference.
Im taking USC for 10 units ML... Im doing it, already in stone. I dont want to hear any opinions otherwise, it is a true life lock. Ice, if u ever wanted to double up do it now with the ML bud....
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
i am perfectly happy with (-6)... no ML needed...
0
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
Hey ICE, any thoughts on KU vs UTEP? I just think KU will handle UTEP relatively easily. UTEP just lost by 6 at home to Buffalo! Input always appreciated
0
Hey ICE, any thoughts on KU vs UTEP? I just think KU will handle UTEP relatively easily. UTEP just lost by 6 at home to Buffalo! Input always appreciated
Good Luck on week 2 , liking your USC , Ok St bets Also taking Navy, Utah, and leaning on Bowling Green as well.. What are your thoughts on these game?
0
Good Luck on week 2 , liking your USC , Ok St bets Also taking Navy, Utah, and leaning on Bowling Green as well.. What are your thoughts on these game?
cool! i think So Miss is my favorite... that line is too low...
will have to do a write-up for USC-Ohio St later, since that is a game of such high interest...
anyone have thoughts on which of these games i should considering adding to the card: TCU (-11), Tx Tech (-27), Tulsa (-17.5), Texas (-33.5)... and no i'm not just focusing on the Texas area teams...
Tech and Tulsa the strongest......Horns should work....but look-ahead /altitude....makes it ??.......TCU stay away......weak road favorite under Patterson......Virg under Groh among best at home (16-5 ATS as dog.....32-16 ATS overall) note: as New Mexico perhaps top fade team in country......Tulsa appealing......HUGE rivalry game (for them) with OU on deck so maybe stay away ? * speaking of WR's.......one of best in country might be DeAndre Brown from S Miss (6-6 / 225).......relevant here as he is listed as ?.....going into game with UCF......slow recovery from broken leg LY
It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
cool! i think So Miss is my favorite... that line is too low...
will have to do a write-up for USC-Ohio St later, since that is a game of such high interest...
anyone have thoughts on which of these games i should considering adding to the card: TCU (-11), Tx Tech (-27), Tulsa (-17.5), Texas (-33.5)... and no i'm not just focusing on the Texas area teams...
Tech and Tulsa the strongest......Horns should work....but look-ahead /altitude....makes it ??.......TCU stay away......weak road favorite under Patterson......Virg under Groh among best at home (16-5 ATS as dog.....32-16 ATS overall) note: as New Mexico perhaps top fade team in country......Tulsa appealing......HUGE rivalry game (for them) with OU on deck so maybe stay away ? * speaking of WR's.......one of best in country might be DeAndre Brown from S Miss (6-6 / 225).......relevant here as he is listed as ?.....going into game with UCF......slow recovery from broken leg LY
phan... of the 3, i find Utah to be the least appealing... USC made SJ St look awful, but i am of the opinion is was more a testament to how good USC is... the line is favorable, but i suspect there is a reason for that... i'm still just not sold on Utah... Navy should give teams fits, and La Tech is no exception... and i think Illinois made Missouri look way better than they really are...
bookie... good info as always... the look ahead is the only thing that makes me worry about Tulsa, especially since they now will feel like they have a shot in that one... but maybe that is all the more reason for them to try to put away NM early... hopefully Brown plays in the So Miss game, but i think they can handle UCF regardless... they have good depth at WR... was thinking of a TT/Tulsa 2-teamer, so you sort of confirmed my thoughts...
0
phan... of the 3, i find Utah to be the least appealing... USC made SJ St look awful, but i am of the opinion is was more a testament to how good USC is... the line is favorable, but i suspect there is a reason for that... i'm still just not sold on Utah... Navy should give teams fits, and La Tech is no exception... and i think Illinois made Missouri look way better than they really are...
bookie... good info as always... the look ahead is the only thing that makes me worry about Tulsa, especially since they now will feel like they have a shot in that one... but maybe that is all the more reason for them to try to put away NM early... hopefully Brown plays in the So Miss game, but i think they can handle UCF regardless... they have good depth at WR... was thinking of a TT/Tulsa 2-teamer, so you sort of confirmed my thoughts...
Buddy, you can stop right there, load on those 3 and maybe tie em all in a parlay for a sheckle or two and you will have a great week.... in fact, i am going todo just that
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
got a few bets in early... will add more...
USC (-6)
So Miss (-14)
Okla St (-15)
Buddy, you can stop right there, load on those 3 and maybe tie em all in a parlay for a sheckle or two and you will have a great week.... in fact, i am going todo just that
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
i am perfectly happy with (-6)... no ML needed...
[/Quote
Ice- that is fricking hilareous. Thank you for the humor. My wife looked at me like "what the hell is so funny!"
I am a USC homer and I dont know if I will play that game. I like to watch SC without any added stress. However I am gald you and WahooS feel so strongly about the Outcome!
I like the card buddy. GL this week.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by Ice4Blood]
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
i am perfectly happy with (-6)... no ML needed...
[/Quote
Ice- that is fricking hilareous. Thank you for the humor. My wife looked at me like "what the hell is so funny!"
I am a USC homer and I dont know if I will play that game. I like to watch SC without any added stress. However I am gald you and WahooS feel so strongly about the Outcome!
KCChefs... sorry i missed yours before... i love Kansas... that looks very easy... Kansas was abismally bad on defense last year, but should be much improved... and their offense will be tough for any team to stop... UTEP is clearly bad, as you pointed out... looks like a bargain...
Alt... good points... i already have other plays, but may do a 3 teamer with my 3 favorites... altho right now those 3 would be VT/OkieSt/SoMiss... need to be able to enjoy the USC game without too much stress... VT is gonna put a hurtin' on Marshall... it is so easy to predict a final score on that game... i can almost guarantee it comes within a TD for each team on this score: 45-7 (meaning 38-52 range for VT, 0-14 range for Marshall)... any score in that range covers...
Baja... glad i could provide some entertainment... i think you will be enjoying that game... just don't think the argument about Barkley being a freshman holds water if nobody can touch him... and that seems to be the only thing to worry about... OSU doesn't have the offensive firepower to exploit any possible weaknesses in the "rebuilt" USC defense...
0
KCChefs... sorry i missed yours before... i love Kansas... that looks very easy... Kansas was abismally bad on defense last year, but should be much improved... and their offense will be tough for any team to stop... UTEP is clearly bad, as you pointed out... looks like a bargain...
Alt... good points... i already have other plays, but may do a 3 teamer with my 3 favorites... altho right now those 3 would be VT/OkieSt/SoMiss... need to be able to enjoy the USC game without too much stress... VT is gonna put a hurtin' on Marshall... it is so easy to predict a final score on that game... i can almost guarantee it comes within a TD for each team on this score: 45-7 (meaning 38-52 range for VT, 0-14 range for Marshall)... any score in that range covers...
Baja... glad i could provide some entertainment... i think you will be enjoying that game... just don't think the argument about Barkley being a freshman holds water if nobody can touch him... and that seems to be the only thing to worry about... OSU doesn't have the offensive firepower to exploit any possible weaknesses in the "rebuilt" USC defense...
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
i am perfectly happy with (-6)... no ML needed...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
my card is already set... you know how i roll with money management, but i agree with your play... you'll win it... USC is way too much for Ohio St... it's just not even debatable...
OSU can play as fired up as they want... as you watch that game what you are going to see is a QB building a campfire behind his offensive line... i'm hoping Barkley will invite me over to roast marshmallows...
the over/under on the number of times an OSU defender touches him is 1.5... and it's too high...
Oops. I meant to write something. Although we disagree on the game, I love that quote.....
On a side note, as an OSU fan I have not been impressed with Tressel's game preparations and in-game adjustments. I think the only chance OSU has in this game is to line up 4 wide and Pryor in the spread. THE WHOLE GAME. This could minimize some of their O line struggles, but would completely go against Tressel's conservative calling. Ice, you think we might see something like this or this this bum Tressel gonna line up and line up and run 2 and have Pryor faced with several 3 and 6??
0
Oops. I meant to write something. Although we disagree on the game, I love that quote.....
On a side note, as an OSU fan I have not been impressed with Tressel's game preparations and in-game adjustments. I think the only chance OSU has in this game is to line up 4 wide and Pryor in the spread. THE WHOLE GAME. This could minimize some of their O line struggles, but would completely go against Tressel's conservative calling. Ice, you think we might see something like this or this this bum Tressel gonna line up and line up and run 2 and have Pryor faced with several 3 and 6??
Ice4blood, any thoughts on neb -23, seems to be same situation as last week playing a weak sunbelt team in lincoln, im thinking same result which would cover easy
GL
0
Ice4blood, any thoughts on neb -23, seems to be same situation as last week playing a weak sunbelt team in lincoln, im thinking same result which would cover easy
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Also taking Navy, Utah, and leaning on Bowling Green as well.. What are your thoughts on these game? 
Hot Forum Topics
