Far be it from me to disagree with you, but I kept my mouth shut about disagreeing with Michigan State last week and that didn't go very well. I don't think Pitt wins this game, though an eyelash cover would, I guess, be a possibility. No home field edge - indeed, Pitt typically plays much worse at home. The only "given" that I see if that Pat White will be the best player on the field. I think Pitt will be deflated off of blowing the whole "controlling their destiny" thing, and WVU seems to be playing better. I'm not generally a big "revenge game" guy, but I think that will provide an edge for WVU here. I don't think either team will like the footing (or lack thereof) at Heinz, but I expect this to wind up 27-14 'Neers after a couple game-altering mistakes from the Panthers. I'm probably wrong. I'm wrong a lot, but thought I'd chime in, as I am very seldom on the other side of one of your plays.
Stuff I played:
GT +9
Texas Tech -20 (where does this line come from?; I just love joining 84% of the public )
UCLA +10.5
SYR +22
Cocks +1
Memphrica -13
Auburn +15
Arky +5
Texas -34
Thanks for UT-M on Saturday (as in Tennessee-Martin, and not ATM which would be something else altogehter ). I think that was my first CBB cash in about 10. Damn Delaware. My teams always get me when I go against them.
0
Far be it from me to disagree with you, but I kept my mouth shut about disagreeing with Michigan State last week and that didn't go very well. I don't think Pitt wins this game, though an eyelash cover would, I guess, be a possibility. No home field edge - indeed, Pitt typically plays much worse at home. The only "given" that I see if that Pat White will be the best player on the field. I think Pitt will be deflated off of blowing the whole "controlling their destiny" thing, and WVU seems to be playing better. I'm not generally a big "revenge game" guy, but I think that will provide an edge for WVU here. I don't think either team will like the footing (or lack thereof) at Heinz, but I expect this to wind up 27-14 'Neers after a couple game-altering mistakes from the Panthers. I'm probably wrong. I'm wrong a lot, but thought I'd chime in, as I am very seldom on the other side of one of your plays.
Stuff I played:
GT +9
Texas Tech -20 (where does this line come from?; I just love joining 84% of the public )
UCLA +10.5
SYR +22
Cocks +1
Memphrica -13
Auburn +15
Arky +5
Texas -34
Thanks for UT-M on Saturday (as in Tennessee-Martin, and not ATM which would be something else altogehter ). I think that was my first CBB cash in about 10. Damn Delaware. My teams always get me when I go against them.
Far be it from me to disagree with you, but I kept my mouth shut about disagreeing with Michigan State last week and that didn't go very well. I don't think Pitt wins this game, though an eyelash cover would, I guess, be a possibility. No home field edge - indeed, Pitt typically plays much worse at home. The only "given" that I see if that Pat White will be the best player on the field. I think Pitt will be deflated off of blowing the whole "controlling their destiny" thing, and WVU seems to be playing better. I'm not generally a big "revenge game" guy, but I think that will provide an edge for WVU here. I don't think either team will like the footing (or lack thereof) at Heinz, but I expect this to wind up 27-14 'Neers after a couple game-altering mistakes from the Panthers. I'm probably wrong. I'm wrong a lot, but thought I'd chime in, as I am very seldom on the other side of one of your plays.
Stuff I played:
GT +9
Texas Tech -20 (where does this line come from?; I just love joining 84% of the public )
UCLA +10.5
SYR +22
Cocks +1
Memphrica -13
Auburn +15
Arky +5
Texas -34
Thanks for UT-M on Saturday (as in Tennessee-Martin, and not ATM which would be something else altogehter ). I think that was my first CBB cash in about 10. Damn Delaware. My teams always get me when I go against them.
disagreeing with me is not the end of the world Maineagree to disagree here my friend, I think Pitt knows how to stop the Neers attack and I think they win the game, if I'm wrong I'm wrong, but I'm hardheaded and I always think I'm right until a play loses and proves me wrong, that has happened more lately than not
my least favorite plays last week were Indiana and Michigan St, but I had different lines than what were offered and I bet them, I had a bad feeling about both when I woke up Saturday and sure enough, neither was even close
I'm looking at South Carolina, Georgia Tech and Arkansas, I will most likely add one of those to my card to make it 7 games for the week
you are always welcome to give your opinion in my thread Maine, agree or disagree, I think you know you're football and I respect the honesty
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:
Far be it from me to disagree with you, but I kept my mouth shut about disagreeing with Michigan State last week and that didn't go very well. I don't think Pitt wins this game, though an eyelash cover would, I guess, be a possibility. No home field edge - indeed, Pitt typically plays much worse at home. The only "given" that I see if that Pat White will be the best player on the field. I think Pitt will be deflated off of blowing the whole "controlling their destiny" thing, and WVU seems to be playing better. I'm not generally a big "revenge game" guy, but I think that will provide an edge for WVU here. I don't think either team will like the footing (or lack thereof) at Heinz, but I expect this to wind up 27-14 'Neers after a couple game-altering mistakes from the Panthers. I'm probably wrong. I'm wrong a lot, but thought I'd chime in, as I am very seldom on the other side of one of your plays.
Stuff I played:
GT +9
Texas Tech -20 (where does this line come from?; I just love joining 84% of the public )
UCLA +10.5
SYR +22
Cocks +1
Memphrica -13
Auburn +15
Arky +5
Texas -34
Thanks for UT-M on Saturday (as in Tennessee-Martin, and not ATM which would be something else altogehter ). I think that was my first CBB cash in about 10. Damn Delaware. My teams always get me when I go against them.
disagreeing with me is not the end of the world Maineagree to disagree here my friend, I think Pitt knows how to stop the Neers attack and I think they win the game, if I'm wrong I'm wrong, but I'm hardheaded and I always think I'm right until a play loses and proves me wrong, that has happened more lately than not
my least favorite plays last week were Indiana and Michigan St, but I had different lines than what were offered and I bet them, I had a bad feeling about both when I woke up Saturday and sure enough, neither was even close
I'm looking at South Carolina, Georgia Tech and Arkansas, I will most likely add one of those to my card to make it 7 games for the week
you are always welcome to give your opinion in my thread Maine, agree or disagree, I think you know you're football and I respect the honesty
I always use the word your or you're wrong, have my whole life never made a B in school and yet I can't use the word properly, my mother still laughs at me to this day about that
.
0
typo, should be your not you're
I always use the word your or you're wrong, have my whole life never made a B in school and yet I can't use the word properly, my mother still laughs at me to this day about that
Since we're critiquing Wahoo's picks, I'll join in
I actually am on Pitt as well, and am 80% sure I'll be adding Auburn.
No disagreements on the others, although I am not anxious to lay over 28 with Sarkisian calling plays. That dude scares me. He is the problem with USC.
It's hard to disagree with Florida, but Florida St. is one of the few teams that can match athletes with Florida. However, they are a dumb team, and I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it within 7 or lost by 30.
Where do you keep getting these avatars Wahoo?
0
Since we're critiquing Wahoo's picks, I'll join in
I actually am on Pitt as well, and am 80% sure I'll be adding Auburn.
No disagreements on the others, although I am not anxious to lay over 28 with Sarkisian calling plays. That dude scares me. He is the problem with USC.
It's hard to disagree with Florida, but Florida St. is one of the few teams that can match athletes with Florida. However, they are a dumb team, and I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it within 7 or lost by 30.
Since we're critiquing Wahoo's picks, I'll join in
I actually am on Pitt as well, and am 80% sure I'll be adding Auburn.
No disagreements on the others, although I am not anxious to lay over 28 with Sarkisian calling plays. That dude scares me. He is the problem with USC.
It's hard to disagree with Florida, but Florida St. is one of the few teams that can match athletes with Florida. However, they are a dumb team, and I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it within 7 or lost by 30.
Where do you keep getting these avatars Wahoo?
I layed much less than USC is at now, but I still like them to pound Charlie and Chocolate Factory, however, I agree about Sarkisian, he is a terrible offensive coordinator, I wish Petey would let him go and hire Chow back, if USC still had Norm Chow they would beat every team in the country by double digits
you are right about Florida, I got them at a much better number than is available now as well, but FSU does have the speed to compete, Meyer seems like a coach that tries to cover though doesn't he? I could actually end up dropping Florida as the week goes on, especially if that line hits over 17, then I may just give it a middle try
I hope Maine took my advice on UNC first half and game, that was a free 2-0
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GAM:
Since we're critiquing Wahoo's picks, I'll join in
I actually am on Pitt as well, and am 80% sure I'll be adding Auburn.
No disagreements on the others, although I am not anxious to lay over 28 with Sarkisian calling plays. That dude scares me. He is the problem with USC.
It's hard to disagree with Florida, but Florida St. is one of the few teams that can match athletes with Florida. However, they are a dumb team, and I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it within 7 or lost by 30.
Where do you keep getting these avatars Wahoo?
I layed much less than USC is at now, but I still like them to pound Charlie and Chocolate Factory, however, I agree about Sarkisian, he is a terrible offensive coordinator, I wish Petey would let him go and hire Chow back, if USC still had Norm Chow they would beat every team in the country by double digits
you are right about Florida, I got them at a much better number than is available now as well, but FSU does have the speed to compete, Meyer seems like a coach that tries to cover though doesn't he? I could actually end up dropping Florida as the week goes on, especially if that line hits over 17, then I may just give it a middle try
I hope Maine took my advice on UNC first half and game, that was a free 2-0
Wahoo - I was a dickhair away from buying firestevesarkisian.com in the first half of the Stanford game, but then realized there was no way to monetize it
Dude is horrible. With Norm Chow, it would be over. Lane Kiffin was solid too. I think he could've done something with Sanchez and the more experienced receivers, but Sarkisian can't do shit.
Sarkisian
0
Wahoo - I was a dickhair away from buying firestevesarkisian.com in the first half of the Stanford game, but then realized there was no way to monetize it
Dude is horrible. With Norm Chow, it would be over. Lane Kiffin was solid too. I think he could've done something with Sanchez and the more experienced receivers, but Sarkisian can't do shit.
Disagreeing with you may not be the end of the world, but it's seldom very profitable. My PSU play last week may have been the first time in two and a half seasons that I was actually on the other side of one of your plays. I'm not sure I'll actually play WVU, as my general rule of thumb with Pitt is never to play on or against them,as they are capable of anything.
I didn't see a number on UNC at MB when I left work, and had to go to a youth lax meeting after that. Oh well; I hate free money anyway. Chaminade, of course, never beats anyone who's llike #1 in the country. Never. Well, hardly ever.
I'm sort of a "spot" player, and while I'm not sure there's much sense in playing against UF right now, they're in an awful spot (brains in Atlanta, bodies in Talahassee). Might be worth a flyer on the FSU ML.
0
Disagreeing with you may not be the end of the world, but it's seldom very profitable. My PSU play last week may have been the first time in two and a half seasons that I was actually on the other side of one of your plays. I'm not sure I'll actually play WVU, as my general rule of thumb with Pitt is never to play on or against them,as they are capable of anything.
I didn't see a number on UNC at MB when I left work, and had to go to a youth lax meeting after that. Oh well; I hate free money anyway. Chaminade, of course, never beats anyone who's llike #1 in the country. Never. Well, hardly ever.
I'm sort of a "spot" player, and while I'm not sure there's much sense in playing against UF right now, they're in an awful spot (brains in Atlanta, bodies in Talahassee). Might be worth a flyer on the FSU ML.
Texas up to 35 now, practically begging someone to take A&M. Aggies have played above their heads recently in series, then again Texas probably won't hesitate to pile on the points for BCS purposes given the opportunity
good to see we both locked in Neb at early number, looks to be around 17.5 now
GL wahoo
0
Texas up to 35 now, practically begging someone to take A&M. Aggies have played above their heads recently in series, then again Texas probably won't hesitate to pile on the points for BCS purposes given the opportunity
good to see we both locked in Neb at early number, looks to be around 17.5 now
i unfortunately like WV this weekend....not just because Pat White is healthy and they want payback, but because their defense is actually playing well....i think they focus on mccoy and force stull to beat them...which aint likely.....
the rest look good, although if tex a&m gets to 35.5 i may have to take the bait....
gl my man and i'll check back later and see whats up
0
what up brother!!!
i unfortunately like WV this weekend....not just because Pat White is healthy and they want payback, but because their defense is actually playing well....i think they focus on mccoy and force stull to beat them...which aint likely.....
the rest look good, although if tex a&m gets to 35.5 i may have to take the bait....
gl my man and i'll check back later and see whats up
i unfortunately like WV this weekend....not just because Pat White is healthy and they want payback, but because their defense is actually playing well....i think they focus on mccoy and force stull to beat them...which aint likely.....
the rest look good, although if tex a&m gets to 35.5 i may have to take the bait....
gl my man and i'll check back later and see whats up
Florida and Pitt may get crossed out my friend, the other 4 are set in stone, Nebraska almost made Large Money but didn't quite qualify like Ole Miss last week, Texas and USC will be kills and Auburn will play Bama to the end, best of luck as always bro
.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
what up brother!!!
i unfortunately like WV this weekend....not just because Pat White is healthy and they want payback, but because their defense is actually playing well....i think they focus on mccoy and force stull to beat them...which aint likely.....
the rest look good, although if tex a&m gets to 35.5 i may have to take the bait....
gl my man and i'll check back later and see whats up
Florida and Pitt may get crossed out my friend, the other 4 are set in stone, Nebraska almost made Large Money but didn't quite qualify like Ole Miss last week, Texas and USC will be kills and Auburn will play Bama to the end, best of luck as always bro
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
)
). I think that was my first CBB cash in about 10. Damn Delaware. 
My teams always get me when I go against them. 
agree to disagree here my friend, I think Pitt knows how to stop the Neers attack and I think they win the game, if I'm wrong I'm wrong, but I'm hardheaded and I always think I'm right until a play loses and proves me wrong, that has happened more lately than not
Hot Forum Topics
