Posted:
#76
Horrid UCF Defense* typo
0
Week 11 Large Money
Posted:
#77
Quote Originally Posted by WahooS:
2, maybe 3 of them but will wait just like last week so everyone can get the "public" lines, those are usually plenty good vs the number so I don't mind waiting to post (I've already bet 1 of them so I'm locked & loaded, waiting on other things for other potential large ones)
2, maybe 3 of them but will wait just like last week so everyone can get the "public" lines, those are usually plenty good vs the number so I don't mind waiting to post (I've already bet 1 of them so I'm locked & loaded, waiting on other things for other potential large ones)
hope you are well D 
Sorry if I missed it, but did you post the 1 that you already locked in? Thanks Wahoos..
0
Posted:
#79
Quote Originally Posted by thienhoang68:
Large on USF..???
Large on USF..???
USF is very underrated. Flowers is a very mobile athletic QB, Marlon Mack is one of the best RB's nobody is talking about. Their D has been very solid, held Memphis to 24 points, went toe to toe with Navy until the final minutes of the game where Navy had a late TD to put it to double digits. At home, I would not be shocked if they beat Temple. Have to do more research on the game but as a USF backer last week, this team caught my attention a few weeks with stellar play. Very solid all around football team.
0
Posted:
#87
Cat Man I like Arizona St. Still leaning Stanford but not sure about laying that much wood. Been raining last few days and if that field is soggy not sure which team it will help. But other then that opening game (Stanford looked so bad) since then have looked great. Some of you guys talk about great coaches and I never hear David Shaw. I think he is right up there.
Looking at one other.
0
Posted:
#92
Quote Originally Posted by Kurshka:
Cat Man I like Arizona St. Still leaning Stanford but not sure about laying that much wood. Been raining last few days and if that field is soggy not sure which team it will help. But other then that opening game (Stanford looked so bad) since then have looked great. Some of you guys talk about great coaches and I never hear David Shaw. I think he is right up there.
Cat Man I like Arizona St. Still leaning Stanford but not sure about laying that much wood. Been raining last few days and if that field is soggy not sure which team it will help. But other then that opening game (Stanford looked so bad) since then have looked great. Some of you guys talk about great coaches and I never hear David Shaw. I think he is right up there.
Looking at one other.
Shaw is a great coach. He admits he's too serious though. Not unlike Kobe Bryant. Kobe does not like goofiness, clowning around (like Lebron or Shaquille, or the ex Laker Howard). That seriousness could be an issue in a game bigger than themselves--too tight.
0
Posted:
#95
Quote Originally Posted by composite:
WahooS - How do you feel about VT at 14-0? (no sarcasm). Would you take them at 2H or in-game betting?
WahooS - How do you feel about VT at 14-0? (no sarcasm). Would you take them at 2H or in-game betting?
Virginia tech sucks and is playing a tech team who played a ridiculously tough schedule. I'm sure if wahoo knew vt was spotting tech 14 points he'd stay away from everything. They look conpletely unprepared tonight
0
Posted:
#96
Quote Originally Posted by daneblazer:
Virginia tech sucks and is playing a tech team who played a ridiculously tough schedule. I'm sure if wahoo knew vt was spotting tech 14 points he'd stay away from everything. They look conpletely unprepared tonight
If you're watching the game, it's obvious the refs are helping GA Tech.
It was pretty obvious that the player on Tech was going to fumble. Who runs with the ball like that? He was swinging his arms really high with the ball in hand.
0
Hot Forum Topics
