I thought this line would be at least 14........now that it's @ 10 I took USC. The Trojans might be flakey this year but it's hard to imagine they won't get better as the season goes on. They have the Huskies outmanned in just about every spot.........& they have the revenge factor. But more than that, I'll bet monkeyboy would love to lay a beatdown on Sark & his team. The Dawgs have stunk OTR & this isn't the spot I would pick for them to break a bad streak..................which of you will be the 1st to mention USC looking ahead?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I thought this line would be at least 14........now that it's @ 10 I took USC. The Trojans might be flakey this year but it's hard to imagine they won't get better as the season goes on. They have the Huskies outmanned in just about every spot.........& they have the revenge factor. But more than that, I'll bet monkeyboy would love to lay a beatdown on Sark & his team. The Dawgs have stunk OTR & this isn't the spot I would pick for them to break a bad streak..................which of you will be the 1st to mention USC looking ahead?
Tough one for me MUGG. Too many x-factors on both sides. I wouldn't be shocked if Wash won outright, or if USC won by 20+. I wouldn't even feel safe putting this game in a teaser.
I agree with your angle. I've just been beat up before by USC in spots like this where all logical factors point to the Trojans.
BOL here and this week!!
0
Tough one for me MUGG. Too many x-factors on both sides. I wouldn't be shocked if Wash won outright, or if USC won by 20+. I wouldn't even feel safe putting this game in a teaser.
I agree with your angle. I've just been beat up before by USC in spots like this where all logical factors point to the Trojans.
One positive for Washington is Sark is familiar with the surroundings..........& they will get Dennison, JJohnson, & Fogerson back. They have had two weeks to prep. Still, had USC not come outta the chute stumbling this line would be 17-20. Unless the Huskies have corrected a bunch of shit in the L2 weeks they have little chance of being in the game in the 4th qtr.
0
One positive for Washington is Sark is familiar with the surroundings..........& they will get Dennison, JJohnson, & Fogerson back. They have had two weeks to prep. Still, had USC not come outta the chute stumbling this line would be 17-20. Unless the Huskies have corrected a bunch of shit in the L2 weeks they have little chance of being in the game in the 4th qtr.
My initial lean was Wash, simply because of how bad USC has played, but Wash is dog shit. USC should have their way on the ground and shut down overrated Locker. I like the play. GL
0
My initial lean was Wash, simply because of how bad USC has played, but Wash is dog shit. USC should have their way on the ground and shut down overrated Locker. I like the play. GL
Sadly, I am backing the Dawgs this week....not even sure I can explain why....just a gut feeling....prolly the same feeling that had me backing them at BYU and laying off them against Cuse...lol
GL this week Mugg......
0
Sadly, I am backing the Dawgs this week....not even sure I can explain why....just a gut feeling....prolly the same feeling that had me backing them at BYU and laying off them against Cuse...lol
I cant get over the fact that Wash will have the better qb and coach in this game. They are also the ones waaaay under the radar after early season woes. Hmmm
0
Respect your thoughts Mugg
I cant get over the fact that Wash will have the better qb and coach in this game. They are also the ones waaaay under the radar after early season woes. Hmmm
Not sure they have the better qb..........Locker hasn't figured out progressions on a consistent basis & the runs they call for him aren't fooling anyone. After watching USC a couple times now I'm convinced they still have better & deeper talent. Kiffen may be a moron but if he can just get outta the way his team will perform. I'm not overreacting to the Nebraska debacle........I just know what I see on the field.........& USC has similar talent to Nebraska (save qb), even if they aren't as well coached.
jimmy........I'm not giving up on the Dawgs.........this is just a biz decision. They may hang around for 2-3 qtrs but the lack of depth is still an issue. Of course it wouldn't upset me too much if they happen to pull the upset.
0
Not sure they have the better qb..........Locker hasn't figured out progressions on a consistent basis & the runs they call for him aren't fooling anyone. After watching USC a couple times now I'm convinced they still have better & deeper talent. Kiffen may be a moron but if he can just get outta the way his team will perform. I'm not overreacting to the Nebraska debacle........I just know what I see on the field.........& USC has similar talent to Nebraska (save qb), even if they aren't as well coached.
jimmy........I'm not giving up on the Dawgs.........this is just a biz decision. They may hang around for 2-3 qtrs but the lack of depth is still an issue. Of course it wouldn't upset me too much if they happen to pull the upset.
USC got off to a slow start this year, but they'll get better as the season goes on, and this is a great game for them to handle some business. Washington is no better than anybody USC has played, and at some point we all know the Trojans are gonna totally let loose on somebody at home. I have a feeling this is gonna be that game.
0
USC got off to a slow start this year, but they'll get better as the season goes on, and this is a great game for them to handle some business. Washington is no better than anybody USC has played, and at some point we all know the Trojans are gonna totally let loose on somebody at home. I have a feeling this is gonna be that game.
.... POD for me on Wash and the Under.1st Hlf,game,and possibly a big 2nd hlf. I think this game will be one sided later in the day...and that means trouble. why not a deja vu?
last week 1-3 lol..
0
.... POD for me on Wash and the Under.1st Hlf,game,and possibly a big 2nd hlf. I think this game will be one sided later in the day...and that means trouble. why not a deja vu?
was expecting around 12-13 for that line, glad to get some USC money back last week after Minny fiasco, imagine they want a piece of both UW and Stanford obviously...USC not blowing people out at home lately 2-5 ATS and surprising lack of playmakers at WR, still UW on shaky ground and not sure how Locker can be confident after 4-for-20
GL this week mugg
0
good to see your thoughts, especially P10
was expecting around 12-13 for that line, glad to get some USC money back last week after Minny fiasco, imagine they want a piece of both UW and Stanford obviously...USC not blowing people out at home lately 2-5 ATS and surprising lack of playmakers at WR, still UW on shaky ground and not sure how Locker can be confident after 4-for-20
Yeah I like USC covering this number since they are the better team on paper. Not going to play it though since UW coming off a bad loss and a bye so I think they will be more competitive in this game.
0
Yeah I like USC covering this number since they are the better team on paper. Not going to play it though since UW coming off a bad loss and a bye so I think they will be more competitive in this game.
I like Washington getting the points here. We have Washington with 2 weeks to prepare for this game. Washington shit the bed against Nebraska but the defense for the Huskers is lightyears ahead of USC's... USC has had a very soft schedule and their secondary is inexperienced. USC is ranked 110th in pass yds allowed/game. Washington's defensive stats are not good either, but they have played a tougher schedule so far. The fact is USC has struggled to beat some very average opponents, and I don't think they deserve to be double digit favorites against any Pac-10 opponent except Wash St. Washington has 18 starters back from last year, and think the team and Locker in particular is going to be very well prepared with the 2 weeks to get ready for this game. Motivation will no doubt be there to make a statement after a poor showing vs Nebraska. I think this is a very close game decided by a FG
0
I like Washington getting the points here. We have Washington with 2 weeks to prepare for this game. Washington shit the bed against Nebraska but the defense for the Huskers is lightyears ahead of USC's... USC has had a very soft schedule and their secondary is inexperienced. USC is ranked 110th in pass yds allowed/game. Washington's defensive stats are not good either, but they have played a tougher schedule so far. The fact is USC has struggled to beat some very average opponents, and I don't think they deserve to be double digit favorites against any Pac-10 opponent except Wash St. Washington has 18 starters back from last year, and think the team and Locker in particular is going to be very well prepared with the 2 weeks to get ready for this game. Motivation will no doubt be there to make a statement after a poor showing vs Nebraska. I think this is a very close game decided by a FG
I like Washington getting the points here. We have Washington with 2 weeks to prepare for this game. Washington shit the bed against Nebraska but the defense for the Huskers is lightyears ahead of USC's... USC has had a very soft schedule and their secondary is inexperienced. USC is ranked 110th in pass yds allowed/game. Washington's defensive stats are not good either, but they have played a tougher schedule so far. The fact is USC has struggled to beat some very average opponents, and I don't think they deserve to be double digit favorites against any Pac-10 opponent except Wash St. Washington has 18 starters back from last year, and think the team and Locker in particular is going to be very well prepared with the 2 weeks to get ready for this game. Motivation will no doubt be there to make a statement after a poor showing vs Nebraska. I think this is a very close game decided by a FG
well said you are on the right side!
0
Quote Originally Posted by HOOPS4LIFE:
I like Washington getting the points here. We have Washington with 2 weeks to prepare for this game. Washington shit the bed against Nebraska but the defense for the Huskers is lightyears ahead of USC's... USC has had a very soft schedule and their secondary is inexperienced. USC is ranked 110th in pass yds allowed/game. Washington's defensive stats are not good either, but they have played a tougher schedule so far. The fact is USC has struggled to beat some very average opponents, and I don't think they deserve to be double digit favorites against any Pac-10 opponent except Wash St. Washington has 18 starters back from last year, and think the team and Locker in particular is going to be very well prepared with the 2 weeks to get ready for this game. Motivation will no doubt be there to make a statement after a poor showing vs Nebraska. I think this is a very close game decided by a FG
I like getting points on this one as well. When the season started, I thought we would be able to get some very good lines for USC. Turns out Vegas had the right idea. USC is a slightly above average team. They certainly are not a very disciplined team. Against BCS schools, I will be taking the points. Washington cannot be as bad as they looked against Nebraska. Locker will certainly be better than he was last time out.
Then again, maybe Im still just a little bitter about letting Minnesota of all teams cover against them late in the fourth quarter :)
0
I like getting points on this one as well. When the season started, I thought we would be able to get some very good lines for USC. Turns out Vegas had the right idea. USC is a slightly above average team. They certainly are not a very disciplined team. Against BCS schools, I will be taking the points. Washington cannot be as bad as they looked against Nebraska. Locker will certainly be better than he was last time out.
Then again, maybe Im still just a little bitter about letting Minnesota of all teams cover against them late in the fourth quarter :)
This would be a good spot for Wash if they didnt beat USC last year.
I dont know where SC is mentally with Kiffen. They might just takl a lot of smack and then end up getting shown up.
If USC kills them it will be they are putting in a great performance. This wont be the Washington that got destroyed by Nebraska I guarantee you that.
Im good on Washington I might have made a mistake in the Nebraska game but I took BYU and I rode Washington HARD against my alma mater Cuse. I think the 10 holds up. Maybe not there are better games.
0
This would be a good spot for Wash if they didnt beat USC last year.
I dont know where SC is mentally with Kiffen. They might just takl a lot of smack and then end up getting shown up.
If USC kills them it will be they are putting in a great performance. This wont be the Washington that got destroyed by Nebraska I guarantee you that.
Im good on Washington I might have made a mistake in the Nebraska game but I took BYU and I rode Washington HARD against my alma mater Cuse. I think the 10 holds up. Maybe not there are better games.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
lol..
..
Hot Forum Topics
