sucker bets or so-called <traps> 3-0 ytd

-11 ? please, please tell me when and where it opened at -11 ???

lmao

Final trap play for this week in CFB:

WMU +14.5 I will buy a full point.

So, trap plays so far:

Cincinnati +7 @ Cleveland (NFL): SU dog win, ATS cover

Tennessee +5.5 vs Baltimore (NFL): SU dog win, ATS cover

Clemson -3.5 vs Auburn (NCAA): SU win, ATS cover

Nevada +21 @ TxTech (NCAA): ??????????????????????

Rice +21 @ Baylor (NCAA): ??????????????????????

Western Michigan +14.5 @ Illinois (NCAA): ?????????????

ok so you're reasoning behind the nevada bet is that a team that has turned the ball over 7 TIMES in 2 games will win the turnover battle against a team that has turned it over 2 TIMES. Great logic. Will you be applying this reverse strategy to any of your other picks this wknd? Also what makes games that are getting almost no public attention traps. If anything these are traps for you as you assume they are garnering a lot of public attention just because its one big name school vs a no name school.

Also all the lines you took were bet up to that line when they opened, since then they have dropped off, if anything you're getting the number after the early birds are done with it and it has been evened out by all comers. GL with your sucker bets but I see nothing suckerish about them.

Also I hate to give you a real sucker bet, but with all your talk of traps and sucker bets you missed one.

Wyoming. If you don't know why nebraska could possibly not care about this game as much as they should, you need to do more homework.

4-0 so far on trap games...

Nice call on nevada althoguh there was no turnover battle to win so that part of your capping was off. Although when you turn the ball over 7 times in 2 games i guess 0 times is a win.