A bit of value was conveyed here last week (5-2, .714). Over eleven weeks, just three losers; albeit with an overall that is little better than flipping a coin (73-65-1, .529). Turning the crank on every game, the box likes all of these: 1) USC(-6.5)/Iowa 2) LSU(-6)/Arkansas 3) GeorgiaSt (+7)/Marshall 4) LA-Monroe(+4)/SoAlabama 5) Alabama(-6.5)/Oklahoma 6) Louisville (-3)/Clemson 7) OhioState(-31.5)/UCLA 8) Washington(-16.5)/Purdue 9) NewMexico(-14)/ColoradoSt 10) FloridaSt(-13)/ VirginiaTech 11) MiamiFlorida(-14.5)/ NorthCarSt 12) WestKentucky(-13.5)/MiddleTenn
The algorithm’s first pick continues to hold strong (8-3, .727). However, a good statistician would correctly advise......beware the small sample size.
I don’t always include a Boring Info Segment, but it’s sometimes unavoidable (geeky nature). Logging final scores last week (as tech cappers always do), I noticed how very-competitive the line seemed to be. As we entered week 10/11, my post spoke to the concept of SpreadMargin (SM) and how The Man was setting a 2025 tougher number in comparison to my past-years database (2013-24, 7583 games). Respectively, those long and short average SMs were 12.23 and 11.51 points. A NG reduction of six percent.....
So, has the 2025 overall average moved; growing even tougher? Taking a quick look; the average SM currently stands at 11.97. So, for the record, and contrary to my anecdotal perception, it has recently moved in a direction reflecting ‘less’ linemaker strength.
We have a seasonal opportunity high-point with 58 on the board this week. To your better fortunes, jump on it..... Good luck, TheKingfish
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A bit of value was conveyed here last week (5-2, .714). Over eleven weeks, just three losers; albeit with an overall that is little better than flipping a coin (73-65-1, .529). Turning the crank on every game, the box likes all of these: 1) USC(-6.5)/Iowa 2) LSU(-6)/Arkansas 3) GeorgiaSt (+7)/Marshall 4) LA-Monroe(+4)/SoAlabama 5) Alabama(-6.5)/Oklahoma 6) Louisville (-3)/Clemson 7) OhioState(-31.5)/UCLA 8) Washington(-16.5)/Purdue 9) NewMexico(-14)/ColoradoSt 10) FloridaSt(-13)/ VirginiaTech 11) MiamiFlorida(-14.5)/ NorthCarSt 12) WestKentucky(-13.5)/MiddleTenn
The algorithm’s first pick continues to hold strong (8-3, .727). However, a good statistician would correctly advise......beware the small sample size.
I don’t always include a Boring Info Segment, but it’s sometimes unavoidable (geeky nature). Logging final scores last week (as tech cappers always do), I noticed how very-competitive the line seemed to be. As we entered week 10/11, my post spoke to the concept of SpreadMargin (SM) and how The Man was setting a 2025 tougher number in comparison to my past-years database (2013-24, 7583 games). Respectively, those long and short average SMs were 12.23 and 11.51 points. A NG reduction of six percent.....
So, has the 2025 overall average moved; growing even tougher? Taking a quick look; the average SM currently stands at 11.97. So, for the record, and contrary to my anecdotal perception, it has recently moved in a direction reflecting ‘less’ linemaker strength.
We have a seasonal opportunity high-point with 58 on the board this week. To your better fortunes, jump on it..... Good luck, TheKingfish
I placed both the Cardinals and the Hurricanes this morning, so got the slightly more-advantageous number on each. Plus, the box had been waiting patiently on a better-number for two more (Tulsa & Ball State; both added). Good luck, TheKingfish
I placed both the Cardinals and the Hurricanes this morning, so got the slightly more-advantageous number on each. Plus, the box had been waiting patiently on a better-number for two more (Tulsa & Ball State; both added). Good luck, TheKingfish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.