All Forums | College Football

NCAA FOOTBALL WK 2

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10826
Posts: 89
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #26
and the Pitt line is +3.5

Vegas agrees with me that the game will be close...

pitt is a NO PLAY
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 2590
Posted: #27
With you, money. Would've strongly considered Pitt at a touchdown. Like Louisiana Tech and NC State, but was hoping for under a FG for each. Also like UCF, Penn State, and Michigan, but not sure whether it's enough for a play. 

Will be against you on UTEP. Ole Miss may not be good, but they're good enough to cover seven when not playing a "WTF HOUSTON NUTT" game. Which they should be done playing this year. 

I'd be careful with Tulane. Tulsa has housed them about seven years in a row. That inflates the line by 10 points or so, but it's also bad business to bet against that kind of trend. No play for me unless it drops back under three touchdowns (fat chance). 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #28
Tulsa is garbage this year...this will be 30-20 or so
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #29
Bol arid, I respect ur opinion greatly 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 413
Posted: #30
I love the nc st play uconn is doo doo on offense their qb is nothing special at all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 413
Posted: #31
Jd what you think about the duke Stanford game I like 14 might be to much but that trip is a bitch
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 27577
Posted: #32
good luck this week!  had smu last night also, how does a team have 40 minutes of possesion time and lose by that many points  crazy shit
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16429
Posted: #33

good  stuff as  usual

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #34
Kenny gamble   I like Stanford -14

potvin    SMU is garbage as usual

sportschat     Bol buddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 27694
Posted: #35
I like your tulane pick 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #36
HOUSTON offensive coordinator Mike Nesbitt resigns today



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #37
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=33&sub=101409656

will update wk 1 record accordingly
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #38
#1
UPDATED WK 1 RESULTS
SEASON RECORD YTD:   7-4-1 (63.64%) 
FUTURES RECORD YTD:  0-0-0          
ATS RECORD YTD:      5-4-1  (55.56%)
O/U RECORD YTD:      2-0     (100%)  
MONSTER PLAYS YTD:   1-0                         
UNITS YTD:                     +3.78                
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WEEK 1 RECAP   7-4-1  : 1-0 on MONSTER PLAYS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARK ST vs OREGON OVER 65     MONSTER PLAY   3 UNITS
Marshall +22 (-120)
Washington St +13
UCF -21
Oklahoma State -63
Oklahoma -30 
SMU +13
USC -39                                                 PUSH
North Texas +45.5
San Jose St +26
UCLA v Rice over 55.5
GT +7.5
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #39
***LOCKED IN***

NC ST -4
UNC -6.5
La Tech -3.5
Penn st +10
Ball state (1.5u)
Tulane +25
MONSTER PLAY: FRESNO STATE v OREGON OVER 73  4UNITS
Air Force vs Michigan over 61.5
FAU vs Mid Tenn State under 48

TEASER: Wisconsin -1 + UNC -1 + Penn St +17 (0.4u to win 1.0u)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #40
                 MONEYLINE LOTTERY PARLAY

AGAIN: NOT AGAINST THE RECORD, JUST FOR FUN

                          Penn State +300
                          Kent State + 230
                          FAU + 255
                   
                          0.1u to win 4.637u
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 13758
Posted: #41
jd Im lovin that teaser. I currently have wisky in a tease myself but what do you think about laying the 7.5? Oregon St is terible in the pac 12 so how will they be able to stick with it vs Wisky? I really cant see this game being too close
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 4583
Posted: #42

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9120
Posted: #43
i think Wisconsin will figure a lot out after week 1. We know they looked bad, and i think this line is overreaction due to wisc. playing a close game vs. UNI, who is a very good D-1AA team.

i think oregon state is really hindered here by not having played a game in wk 1. their game vs. Nichols state was postponed, and so after all the mental preparation of week 1, to not play a game can be demoralizing.

How will OSU react and change if things arent working properly? What adjustments will be made on the fly? They havent had the chance to go over any tape on THEMSELVES, so they will be making week 1 mistakes and have wk 1 jitters.

Personally i think this game will be close throughout the 3rd quarter, but i think wisconsin is in a great spot to cover this number and win by at least 14 points.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 1442
Posted: #44

Trey, The Whisky game won't be close. OSU cannot stop the run.  BLOWOUT. Ball three td's, White 2 td's and Gordon one for the road.   42- 17.

 

Da Pun

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 13758
Posted: #45

JT i totally agree that OSU not playing a week 1 game will definately stimie them. Facing Wisky week 2 with first game jitters and mistakes in gonna be very tough for them. If they make mistakes early and often which I think they will, this could get out of hand quick IMO. May go large on Wisky.

Pun I agree I see a blowout too. Lovin Wisky week1 and it may be my only play. Considering going large  perfect situational play for them in week 2 IMO against a very subpar Pac 12 squad who has trouble stepping up in class

Didnt mean to clog up your thread JT but I like the Wisky ML  a lot

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 2437
Posted: #46
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3072
Posted: #47
No I disagree with Wisky. They don't play well in the beginning of the season. Look at all the problems they have with UNLV when they travel there. UNLV blows every year but Wisky is just a bad road team. No play for me.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12254
Posted: #48

We are very much on the same page this week. 

Not only is UVa not ten points better than Duke, but the Devils will beat the Hoos in Durham in the middle of the season.  PSU probably has talent that is equal to or better than that of Virginia.

I think you're right about Tulsa, but I'm not sure Tulane even has middle-of-the-road 1-AA talent. 

Laying two TD's with Indiana might be evidence of a serious gambling problem.   They're lucky they got past the Sycamores (picked 5th in the Valley). 

I have a 50-1 parlay of Kent, PSU and Rice.  Maybe we'll both get rich. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12254
Posted: #49

I'm also sort of torn on Pitt.  Yes, I think the world will over-react to the Panthers' loss to a very good YSU team, but I also think Pitt kind of is what it is.  The lines got killed.  The QB is terrible.  I suspect they'll offer some value at some point, but I'm not sure this is the week to try and find it (though that line really is begging for Cincy money, no?). 

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1999
Posted: #50
Best of luck this week 

AP
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.