[Quote: Originally Posted by Win12345] This is all good fodder. It really all comes down to 3 criteria:
1.) Where are you ranked to start the season.
2.) When you lose.
3.) And if you lose it better be to really good team.
--to have a shot at the crown.
As much as Nick Saban is a fuck-stick liar at best; is he a great coach?
Without debate.Is Alabama one of the top shelf team this year?
Without debate.Ice4blood, you hit it right on the head--we're splitting hairs and that is why this thread is still alive and kicking.
In
all honesty, Okie St. could beat OU by 35 Saturday in Stillwater
and
make OU look like a high school team and it still wouldn't matter
because they lost to a scum like ISU as a 28 point favorite. They blew
it. Stanford got run by the Ducks like Tuggy would in an Auburn, Alabama
tavern.
If the Cowboys or the Cardinal would have taken care of
business in their iffy Conferences we wouldn't be here in this thread
for the most part.
They gave Roll Shit a window to still their fat ass heads through and they have.
There
are more SEC dicksucker voters than any other football Conference
and I
know the Big 10 gets some good head. But, not like the SEC.
I
guess in the grand scheme of things if LSU wins the Crystal Ball after
the dust settles...the College Football world will be back on it's
correct axis.
But, if Roll-Shit wins
..........Let the shit fly and the Playoffs talk will spread like wild fire.
By far away your best POST in this controversial Tide hattin' thread.U ask for civility but u antagonize Tide backers, that woud piss me off too. but, onto topic.
If a playoff system could result from a Bama win in BCSNCG that would be AWESOME
I am a BIG SUPPORTER of playoffs that could net NCAA some serious
PLAYOFF SYSTEM
that is why we can end all this drama BS and settle it on the field