killing the books...here is the mother of all traps (sucker goy)

How are we gonna TELL this guy what his GOY is?  Whether he's right or wrong, value is in the eye of the beholder, and value is found where the public thinks there is no value.  Obviously his writeup suggests both are true with this play.  There absolutely is more value for me in other games, but where do we get off telling this dude what HE'S thinking?

Those of us worth talking to on this site are in the minority.  I come for opinions, but half the threads i find are arguments over discussions, people talking shit after games are over about how wrong others were and fixes.  He provided a thorough writeup, if he's wrong explain to him further why he's wrong instead of just saying he's wrong.

where it is said that a goy must be on oklahoma, stanford, notre dame, lsu, alabama....i havent seen that rule anywhere in my 30+ years betting...when i say a goy, i am not saying that i am betting my house on it. my regular play is 3% of my bankroll. this one is barely 4% of my bakroll. i am calling it a goy because all of my plays so far were from 2.5%-3.5% and this is the first one and probably the last one this season where i am betting 4% on a single game. if it loses, i will not bankrupt. heck, i can lose many plays in a row and stil have a bankrol to work with. good luck

i already hear people capping this game the old fashioned sucker way...wake beat fsu, fsu rolled duke, duke has no chance. loving it ! some people are just too lazy to look deeper before placing a wager or before posting a play here. but thats why vegas is so beautifull.

wake won against fsu by 5...thats great...but they won the turnover battle 5-0 in that game, and when you win your turnover battle 5-0, you should win by at least double digits, especially at home. so that win is a bad win in my book.

Is there such thing as a bad win for a wake team that doesnt have the same talent level as FSU.? A bad win? thats just the most retarded thing ive heard, a WIN is WIN. I'm on Wake -2