All Forums | College Football

Has Anyone Watched Stanford or Washington Closely This Season?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6399
Posts: 70
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20656
Posted: #51
LY Stan/Luck only threw for 169 but Rushed for 446! averaging 10.1 per carry! I see a huge night for Stephan
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 34171
Posted: #52
Zoot, Vi is showing Stanford -7 at MGM/Mirage currently.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20656
Posted: #53
I saw that Wise
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 2573
Posted: #54
its gonna bounce from 6 to 6.5 to 7 until tip off..just get the best line fellahs
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38175
Posted: #55
zoot,

 my 1st thought on this line was stanford -14.5 although 17 wouldn't have surprised me. I was just gonna lay off & root for the Dawgs. When I saw 7 I was shocked...........having watched both teams this year I've seen a lot of similarities..........Tree still runs a power game & the Huskies still can't stop it, nor can they open holes very often vs a bigger DL.
 The Huskies have one chance........hit some big plays passing & they can hang. It may be close for a while but the lack of any depth on either line for the Huskies will eventually be their demise.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 71024
Posted: #56
Trust mugg on that one.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20656
Posted: #57
Mugg, I completely agree
I too was a bit shocked by the 7, I was expecting at the least 10 or 11
Good points 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 34171
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

zoot,

 my 1st thought on this line was stanford -14.5 although 17 wouldn't have surprised me. I was just gonna lay off & root for the Dawgs. When I saw 7 I was shocked...........having watched both teams this year I've seen a lot of similarities..........Tree still runs a power game & the Huskies still can't stop it, nor can they open holes very often vs a bigger DL.
 The Huskies have one chance........hit some big plays passing & they can hang. It may be close for a while but the lack of any depth on either line for the Huskies will eventually be their demise.



Mugg, Good insight. Thanks for your perspective.This is my only
play this week.

Best of Luck this Week. 
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 33734
Posted: #59
Played Stanford , thanks for the Info  Good Read
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 7833
Posted: #60
well I will make this real fast you will see speed vs slow. if you don't have a QB then I can't bet you. stanford QB is very bad. 1 game on the road never ever look at stanford last game and say oh stanford beat usc so they should beat WASHINGTON. wrong way to look at this game the game was 2 weeks ago but stanford most likely  is still partying. stanford will be in for a real big surprise when they face WASHINGTON. I new the wise guys would be all over this game because this money coming in is not public money. but remember nothing is for sure but death bet at your owe risk. because sooner or later i'm going to get it real hard I really don't want to think that way but it's going to happen. but lets hope much later gl p.s. when the public is on a team like there on stanford you no what the saying is if its to good to be true it is. just like last week with OREGON STATE that was to be an easy game wrong the wise guys hit that game two goodnight I hope you make the right bet gl to the bank
Dilaudid8
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 3347
Posted: #61
Stanford 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 176
Posted: #62
The Husky offensive line is a mess due to injuries. Their senior center will be surrounded by frosh and soph guards and tackles with no significant playing time before this season. While I usually play the home dog on Weekday night games, I have to lay the points and go with Stanford, particularly after watching what their front 7 did to the Trojan O line.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 1106
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:



Mugg,

#1. That game was at home and IMO Washington's defense was much worse than it is now with the new coordinator. #2. They had Luck. A big part of Stanford's run game success the last few years was Luck. Teams were scared of this guy and had to cover the pass so there were miles of room to run. Plus Tree is missing two high NFL picks on the line. So far Stanford has run for 3.5 YPC and 3.8 YPC against the likes of SJSU and Duke. They looked to get better against USC but take out one breakaway 59 yard run and they were under 4.0 YPC again. When your QB stinks teams will stuff the box to contain the run and try to make the kid beat them. That's exactly what Washington will do IMO.

Agreed.  Should be interesting to see how it plays out. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3083
Posted: #64

What it seems like is everyone is sorta confused as to why the line is what it is... I'm just as confused but have my thoughts....

Anyone watch MNF? Aaron Rodgers couldn't talk to himself let alone anyone else. It will be the same tonight in that building only with a terrible "just don't fuck the game up" young as can be quarterback on the rd for the 1st time trying to lead his tm. Stanford isn't exactly running the ball very well this yr and might have to ask more of it's qb and his arm (yikes). The line is moving a half pt up and down like mad after being set at 7/7.5....it's seems pretty obvious to me imo that the books just want as equal action as they can get on this gm. In that case, I will take the tm at home getting pts and sprinkle a little on the ML...That stadium will be rocking tonight on national tv

Wash +7.5 (.5 pt) -120   (still at +& w/ my local)  1unit

Wash ML +215  .5unit

GL to all tonight, should be a fun gm to watch

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 7112
Posted: #65
I know I had Stanford at SJS and they were lucky to win.  I believe they cost me on a teaser.  They may not be that good.  WA put up big numbers in their bowl game last year versus Baylor and u no who.  My book was at -6.5 but now at -7.  I saw earlier posts saying they like the points.  These guys mostly bet by looking at value and money movement.  Some cappers go strictly by money flow not looking into variables 
Iike injuries, home-field, etc.   I know couple seasons ago, USC went up to Oregon St. And got upset on a Thurs. nite.  Also remember way back on Thurs. nights Va. t. Would crush teams and Miami too.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 13951
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by doliver517:

What it seems like is everyone is sorta confused as to why the line is what it is... I'm just as confused but have my thoughts....

Anyone watch MNF? Aaron Rodgers couldn't talk to himself let alone anyone else. It will be the same tonight in that building only with a terrible "just don't fuck the game up" young as can be quarterback on the rd for the 1st time trying to lead his tm. Stanford isn't exactly running the ball very well this yr and might have to ask more of it's qb and his arm (yikes). The line is moving a half pt up and down like mad after being set at 7/7.5....it's seems pretty obvious to me imo that the books just want as equal action as they can get on this gm. In that case, I will take the tm at home getting pts and sprinkle a little on the ML...That stadium will be rocking tonight on national tv

Wash +7.5 (.5 pt) -120   (still at +& w/ my local)  1unit

Wash ML +215  .5unit

GL to all tonight, should be a fun gm to watch



As far as I know, the game is being played at Husky Stadium, not CenturyLink Field.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3083
Posted: #67

@Freak-

I read in post #39 they were playing at CenturyLink, which made me really like the Huskies even more. I didn't exactly look to see where the game was being played as I assumed it was at Husky Stadium to begin with. Kinda a little bummed to not be a ble to see that Field rocking/shaking again. I still like my plays, who are you on?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 1529
Posted: #68
it is being played at CenturyLink...  Great thread, GL guys!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 38175
Posted: #69
jimmy.........all the Husky HG's are @ Seahawks Stadium this year while Husky Stadium gets a much-needed rebuild.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3083
Posted: #70

UW ML

UW +7.5

Congrats to those who were on the right side

This was a good thread imo...a lot of quality information. We need more of em around here.

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.