Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now...
And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors...
LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now...
And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors...
LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now... And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors... LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365
LIVE hedge BET #2 mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -190 *BB @B365
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now... And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors... LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365
LIVE hedge BET #2 mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -190 *BB @B365
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now... And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors... LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365 LIVE hedge BET #2 mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -190 *BB @B365
LIVE hedge BET late-4Q Miss lead 27 -24, Miami drive: Rebs -210 @B365 *BB
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to Rebels on a tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score... ANd now another HUGE LUCKY BREAK goes to the Rebels as #24 Miami DROPS an easy int....so REBS keep their scoring drive alive and I believe, the fates will allow them a score now... LUCKY Rebs do get a FG.... On the game, Miami still DOMINATING the stats despite this recent REB drive for a FG still has them with ONE extra drive advantage ... CHris summarized it perfectly....17 - 16 score BECAUSE of multiple dropped interceptions, false start penalties and an unlucky tipped pass int snuffing out a sure score.....Miami SHOULD be leading by at least 2 TDs right now... And with that I can see the fates changing the tides despite the Miami dominance...just too many UNFORCEDE, self-inflicted errors... LIVE hedge BET mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -150 @B365 LIVE hedge BET #2 mid 4Q 17 - 16, Rebs drive: Rebels -190 *BB @B365
LIVE hedge BET late-4Q Miss lead 27 -24, Miami drive: Rebs -210 @B365 *BB
@fubah2 I had Ole Miss, but congratulations to you, Fubah!
It was a coin-flipper as I predicted....so a bet on either team realistically could have gone either way...Rebels losing their star RB at full strength hurt them, buit they were the recipients of the large majority of breaks.....Still, their passing game and dual-threat are very formidable!
Similar setup for Friday's game.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
@fubah2 I had Ole Miss, but congratulations to you, Fubah!
It was a coin-flipper as I predicted....so a bet on either team realistically could have gone either way...Rebels losing their star RB at full strength hurt them, buit they were the recipients of the large majority of breaks.....Still, their passing game and dual-threat are very formidable!
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: @fubah2 I had Ole Miss, but congratulations to you, Fubah! It was a coin-flipper as I predicted....so a bet on either team realistically could have gone either way...Rebels losing their star RB at full strength hurt them, buit they were the recipients of the large majority of breaks.....Still, their passing game and dual-threat are very formidable! Similar setup for Friday's game.....
Got to appreciate the humble part of you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: @fubah2 I had Ole Miss, but congratulations to you, Fubah! It was a coin-flipper as I predicted....so a bet on either team realistically could have gone either way...Rebels losing their star RB at full strength hurt them, buit they were the recipients of the large majority of breaks.....Still, their passing game and dual-threat are very formidable! Similar setup for Friday's game.....
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PHHHUCK!!! I was typing my bet on Miami on a much lower ML when Beck tosses a TD before I could finish typing.... My pinnacle bet line was -190 during the Miami drive but I obviously can't submit that NOW after the TD. BAD BEAT! So far, no officially posted bet to count.....but of course I am rooting for my Miami bet Anyway, Miami leading 17 - 10 is clearly **DOMINATING** the stats now after even number of drives... I might post a LIVE bet on Miami yet but very risky at much higher ML .... LIVE BET late 1h 17 - 10, Miss driving!: Miami -260 BB @pinnacle
good call
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: PHHHUCK!!! I was typing my bet on Miami on a much lower ML when Beck tosses a TD before I could finish typing.... My pinnacle bet line was -190 during the Miami drive but I obviously can't submit that NOW after the TD. BAD BEAT! So far, no officially posted bet to count.....but of course I am rooting for my Miami bet Anyway, Miami leading 17 - 10 is clearly **DOMINATING** the stats now after even number of drives... I might post a LIVE bet on Miami yet but very risky at much higher ML .... LIVE BET late 1h 17 - 10, Miss driving!: Miami -260 BB @pinnacle
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later Mendoza Over 22.5 Rush, scramble bump DEF tighten coverage good for rush
@Skware
Still on finishing touches of my humble analysis. Back soon.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skware:
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later Mendoza Over 22.5 Rush, scramble bump DEF tighten coverage good for rush
@Skware
Still on finishing touches of my humble analysis. Back soon.
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later Mendoza Over 22.5 Rush, scramble bump DEF tighten coverage good for rush
Ok....on this one, I looked over Mendoza's stats IN GAMES vs non-weak opps...ie, GOOD teams/winning, or at least very tough....I don't play a QB rushing prop myself as I believe SACKS are included as negative yardage!....So with that in mind, in those "meaningful" games his net rush stats were:
4 September
26 September
32 early October
------------------------------
20 Nov 8, Penn St.
-24 Wisc
-3 OSU
16 Bama
So he made the number 22.5 only 2 times out of 7 vs tough opps, due in part to being sacked by those tougher opps.....and perhaps weighted a little more should be on the MOST RECENT games...
1
Quote Originally Posted by Skware:
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later Mendoza Over 22.5 Rush, scramble bump DEF tighten coverage good for rush
Ok....on this one, I looked over Mendoza's stats IN GAMES vs non-weak opps...ie, GOOD teams/winning, or at least very tough....I don't play a QB rushing prop myself as I believe SACKS are included as negative yardage!....So with that in mind, in those "meaningful" games his net rush stats were:
4 September
26 September
32 early October
------------------------------
20 Nov 8, Penn St.
-24 Wisc
-3 OSU
16 Bama
So he made the number 22.5 only 2 times out of 7 vs tough opps, due in part to being sacked by those tougher opps.....and perhaps weighted a little more should be on the MOST RECENT games...
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later
@Skware
OK.....for this other one, personally I really avoid laying -0.5 on the 1stQ in particular since games often do strart off slow during this "feeling each other out" stage of the game *AND* sometimes a Q might only have one possession each, usually meaning a tie when the opps are EVENLY MATCHED!
But statistically, when playing "meaningful" games (ie, the tougher opps) Hoosiers won the 1stQ 5 of 7 times, yes, but that -0.5 1Q prop would have LOST the two most recent - vs arguably the toughest opps (Bama and OSU) Recency is IMPORTANT as the opps are better prepared with more game film at the end of the year!
Likewise, the Mighty Ducks of OREGON, won the 1stQ in 7 of the 10 "meaningful" games they played - including all of the last 6 games vs tough opps since Oct 27...
Of course anything can happen in football but personally I think I would PASS on those two props and look for other opportunities...
Now watch.....right after I type all this, an hour from now I'll be wrong .... LOL
1
Quote Originally Posted by Skware:
Hello fubah2. Your thoughts on Cignetti 1Q -0.5, Ducks DEF has a real tendency to start slow and tighten later
@Skware
OK.....for this other one, personally I really avoid laying -0.5 on the 1stQ in particular since games often do strart off slow during this "feeling each other out" stage of the game *AND* sometimes a Q might only have one possession each, usually meaning a tie when the opps are EVENLY MATCHED!
But statistically, when playing "meaningful" games (ie, the tougher opps) Hoosiers won the 1stQ 5 of 7 times, yes, but that -0.5 1Q prop would have LOST the two most recent - vs arguably the toughest opps (Bama and OSU) Recency is IMPORTANT as the opps are better prepared with more game film at the end of the year!
Likewise, the Mighty Ducks of OREGON, won the 1stQ in 7 of the 10 "meaningful" games they played - including all of the last 6 games vs tough opps since Oct 27...
Of course anything can happen in football but personally I think I would PASS on those two props and look for other opportunities...
Now watch.....right after I type all this, an hour from now I'll be wrong .... LOL
BTW, I am calling tonight's game a virtual coin-flipper...
I agree, 3 points seems very sharp to me either way. I have a feeling the Ducks defense is going to show out tonight. But the Cignetti factor is keeping me from playing the Ducks. I'm liking the 1H under. That's about it. Good luck!
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BTW, I am calling tonight's game a virtual coin-flipper...
I agree, 3 points seems very sharp to me either way. I have a feeling the Ducks defense is going to show out tonight. But the Cignetti factor is keeping me from playing the Ducks. I'm liking the 1H under. That's about it. Good luck!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.