Armed Forces Bowl:
LIVE 2nd BET early 2Q, no score, Bobcats drive off TO: Texas St. -9.5 -220 alt@B365
LEANING to NAVY but SU only in LIVE play...
Cinci will be missing a LOT of players on defense - most of those starters!
And the KEY loss: they lose their excellent DUAL-threat QB (Sorsby) and at least one good RB ....although they do keep their fine starting OL and do have very capable RBs waiting to get their chance. Backup QB (Lichtenberg, SENIOR) is little used but may be a capable dual-threat himself so I expect a heavy dose of the time-consuming run game.
OBVIOUSLY though, we should expect some dropoff at QB (passing? but perhaps not rushing, imo) and a significant step-back by the Cinci defense.
Prior to all the opt-outs, I had 10 - 2 Navy rated in the same vicinity as 7 - 5 Cinci.
I have to DOWNGRADE my rating of Cinci significantly.
Here's the thing: look at Navy's resume very closely! 10 - 2 is misleading - BECAUSE they compiled that record playing many loser teams! And three of those were close!!
They edged very mediocre ARMY by only one point!! Yes, they defeated a decent USF team - but only by 3 pts and that was on homefield. This is a neutral site. NAVY will win SU of course, but even after I downgrade Cinci down to "loser team" rating-status, Cinci would then rate roughly similar to those "loser teams" that NAVY defeated by just one score
Covering more than a full TD (ie, 2 scores) may be a struggle. So much depends on how well Cinci's depleted defense plays and their backup QB (legit dual-threat??) ....making this a "watch & wait" for me, LEANING to NAVY SU... I will not risk a bet pre-game on a team that has not consistently defeated mediocre/weaker teams by 2 scores...
LEANING to NAVY but SU only in LIVE play...
Cinci will be missing a LOT of players on defense - most of those starters!
And the KEY loss: they lose their excellent DUAL-threat QB (Sorsby) and at least one good RB ....although they do keep their fine starting OL and do have very capable RBs waiting to get their chance. Backup QB (Lichtenberg, SENIOR) is little used but may be a capable dual-threat himself so I expect a heavy dose of the time-consuming run game.
OBVIOUSLY though, we should expect some dropoff at QB (passing? but perhaps not rushing, imo) and a significant step-back by the Cinci defense.
Prior to all the opt-outs, I had 10 - 2 Navy rated in the same vicinity as 7 - 5 Cinci.
I have to DOWNGRADE my rating of Cinci significantly.
Here's the thing: look at Navy's resume very closely! 10 - 2 is misleading - BECAUSE they compiled that record playing many loser teams! And three of those were close!!
They edged very mediocre ARMY by only one point!! Yes, they defeated a decent USF team - but only by 3 pts and that was on homefield. This is a neutral site. NAVY will win SU of course, but even after I downgrade Cinci down to "loser team" rating-status, Cinci would then rate roughly similar to those "loser teams" that NAVY defeated by just one score
Covering more than a full TD (ie, 2 scores) may be a struggle. So much depends on how well Cinci's depleted defense plays and their backup QB (legit dual-threat??) ....making this a "watch & wait" for me, LEANING to NAVY SU... I will not risk a bet pre-game on a team that has not consistently defeated mediocre/weaker teams by 2 scores...
LIVE 2nd BET early 2Q, no score, Bobcats drive off TO: Texas St. -9.5 -220 alt@B365
WINNER! ![]()
LIVE 2nd BET early 2Q, no score, Bobcats drive off TO: Texas St. -9.5 -220 alt@B365
WINNER! ![]()
Friday, January 02:
W Texas State -9.5 -330 alt-line@FD *BB
W LIVE 2nd BET early 2Q, no score, Bobcats drive off TO: Tex St. -9.5 -220 alt@B365
2 - 0 so far today
21 - 6 77.7% so far this post-season
Friday, January 02:
W Texas State -9.5 -330 alt-line@FD *BB
W LIVE 2nd BET early 2Q, no score, Bobcats drive off TO: Tex St. -9.5 -220 alt@B365
2 - 0 so far today
21 - 6 77.7% so far this post-season
Another pre-game posted *BB WINNER!
This *BB win brings my post-season *Best bets to: 15 - 4 78.9%
Another pre-game posted *BB WINNER!
This *BB win brings my post-season *Best bets to: 15 - 4 78.9%
@Fester
Not for me, no.....too much uncertainty. Cinci showing some offensive grit! I will stick with my stated belief (above) that NAVY wins SU but it's a coin-flipper to cover the game spread or the 2h spread which I see now at -3.5 ....nah....not me, but BoL if you venture a bet on it
![]()
@Fester
Not for me, no.....too much uncertainty. Cinci showing some offensive grit! I will stick with my stated belief (above) that NAVY wins SU but it's a coin-flipper to cover the game spread or the 2h spread which I see now at -3.5 ....nah....not me, but BoL if you venture a bet on it
![]()
@Bjorn_Borg
Maybe....best I can say at this point.
PASS on the Wake/MSU game for sure! Waaaaaaay too much guessing involved.
For the AZ/SMU game I wrote the following a couple hrs ago in another thread:
" AZ Wildcats are the better team and SHOULD be favored by 2.5 on a neutral field.
I am LEANING to them as well...
But the line shift to SMU is cause for concern, and should give the seasoned capper reason to pause.
I see nothing on injury reports or Opt-outs to account for this so it is likely some as yet UNannounced player(s) issue, and such unexplained line shifts always cause me to HOLD OFF until gametime to see what's up.
There's no obligation to make a bet pre-game. I'd much rather wait to be sure, even if it means a tiny increase in LIVE BET juice on my pick... "
I hope this is of at least some help, gents...BoL with your bets today ![]()
![]()
@Bjorn_Borg
Maybe....best I can say at this point.
PASS on the Wake/MSU game for sure! Waaaaaaay too much guessing involved.
For the AZ/SMU game I wrote the following a couple hrs ago in another thread:
" AZ Wildcats are the better team and SHOULD be favored by 2.5 on a neutral field.
I am LEANING to them as well...
But the line shift to SMU is cause for concern, and should give the seasoned capper reason to pause.
I see nothing on injury reports or Opt-outs to account for this so it is likely some as yet UNannounced player(s) issue, and such unexplained line shifts always cause me to HOLD OFF until gametime to see what's up.
There's no obligation to make a bet pre-game. I'd much rather wait to be sure, even if it means a tiny increase in LIVE BET juice on my pick... "
I hope this is of at least some help, gents...BoL with your bets today ![]()
![]()
Arizona will be without defensive backs Dalton Johnson, Genesis Smith, and Treydan Stukes, who have opted out of the Holiday Bowl. SMU's quarterback Kevin Jennings is confirmed to play, but other potential opt-outs for SMU have not been specified.
That's from AI
Arizona will be without defensive backs Dalton Johnson, Genesis Smith, and Treydan Stukes, who have opted out of the Holiday Bowl. SMU's quarterback Kevin Jennings is confirmed to play, but other potential opt-outs for SMU have not been specified.
That's from AI
@stevebo42
THANKS STEVE!! All news to me! Were not previously listed!
Three secondary starters who are 3 of their top 5 tacklers!![]()
@stevebo42
THANKS STEVE!! All news to me! Were not previously listed!
Three secondary starters who are 3 of their top 5 tacklers!![]()
@stevebo42 THANKS STEVE!! All news to me! Were not previously listed! Three secondary starters who are 3 of their top 5 tacklers!
It's going to make it VERY difficult for AZ to stop SMU!!! ![]()
@stevebo42 THANKS STEVE!! All news to me! Were not previously listed! Three secondary starters who are 3 of their top 5 tacklers!
It's going to make it VERY difficult for AZ to stop SMU!!! ![]()
WOW! I'll say! Opening possession and SMU beats the depleted AZ secondary for a long play, then quickly score! ![]()
WOW! I'll say! Opening possession and SMU beats the depleted AZ secondary for a long play, then quickly score! ![]()
Posted by stevebo42 Arizona will be without defensive backs Dalton Johnson, Genesis Smith, and Treydan Stukes, who have opted out of the Holiday Bowl. SMU's quarterback Kevin Jennings is confirmed to play, but other potential opt-outs for SMU have not been specified. That's from AI...IT IS NICE TO HAVE HELP FROM THE FORUM POSTERS ![]()
Posted by stevebo42 Arizona will be without defensive backs Dalton Johnson, Genesis Smith, and Treydan Stukes, who have opted out of the Holiday Bowl. SMU's quarterback Kevin Jennings is confirmed to play, but other potential opt-outs for SMU have not been specified. That's from AI...IT IS NICE TO HAVE HELP FROM THE FORUM POSTERS ![]()
@Betfusion
YEP! THANKS!
The rumors were true!
3 key AZ defensive backs opted-out but were not widely known/expected.
![]()
Now we know WHY the better team saw their fav status switch to underdog!
Always wise to press the pause button when an otherwise unexplained line change of that magnitude occurs. Sure, AZ can still win, and they may! Losing those previously UNannounced starters doesn't guarantee a loss to SMU. Never know! But imo, it's much wiser to wait and confirm the reasons for the 4 point line swing and THEN make a bet, if still feasible...
Right now (7 - 0 SMU) I am very pleased I held off betting my LEAN to AZ...
@Betfusion
YEP! THANKS!
The rumors were true!
3 key AZ defensive backs opted-out but were not widely known/expected.
![]()
Now we know WHY the better team saw their fav status switch to underdog!
Always wise to press the pause button when an otherwise unexplained line change of that magnitude occurs. Sure, AZ can still win, and they may! Losing those previously UNannounced starters doesn't guarantee a loss to SMU. Never know! But imo, it's much wiser to wait and confirm the reasons for the 4 point line swing and THEN make a bet, if still feasible...
Right now (7 - 0 SMU) I am very pleased I held off betting my LEAN to AZ...

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.