Would you still play on Bama even at -7? That is what my local guy has. Im kinda gunshy on 7
I don't think 7 is a bad number. I mean if you have 6.5 you still need Bama to win by 7. Now it'll be a push instead of a win. To answer your question more directly, yes I still thin it's a great play at 7. I think Bama wins this game by 20 or better.
![]()
FREAK OUT!!!
Would you still play on Bama even at -7? That is what my local guy has. Im kinda gunshy on 7
I don't think 7 is a bad number. I mean if you have 6.5 you still need Bama to win by 7. Now it'll be a push instead of a win. To answer your question more directly, yes I still thin it's a great play at 7. I think Bama wins this game by 20 or better.
![]()
FREAK OUT!!!
See my reply to Koko 2 posts above yours!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
See my reply to Koko 2 posts above yours!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
I watched that game, and from that point on it was obvious that any team that can stop WVU's run offense and force them to use that Pop Warner passing game they have, will have a tremendous advantage. ECU's run-d (or Colorado's) is not even in the same room as Auburn's, so look for WVU to look downright pathetic once they are forced into obvious passing situations early and often.
![]()
I watched that game, and from that point on it was obvious that any team that can stop WVU's run offense and force them to use that Pop Warner passing game they have, will have a tremendous advantage. ECU's run-d (or Colorado's) is not even in the same room as Auburn's, so look for WVU to look downright pathetic once they are forced into obvious passing situations early and often.
![]()
I watched that game, and from that point on it was obvious that any team that can stop WVU's run offense and force them to use that Pop Warner passing game they have, will have a tremendous advantage. ECU's run-d (or Colorado's) is not even in the same room as Auburn's, so look for WVU to look downright pathetic once they are forced into obvious passing situations early and often.
![]()
We are on the same page Mike ![]()
buddy!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
I watched that game, and from that point on it was obvious that any team that can stop WVU's run offense and force them to use that Pop Warner passing game they have, will have a tremendous advantage. ECU's run-d (or Colorado's) is not even in the same room as Auburn's, so look for WVU to look downright pathetic once they are forced into obvious passing situations early and often.
![]()
We are on the same page Mike ![]()
buddy!!!
FREAK OUT!!!
Thanks for the kind words Bamarod. Being on top of the capping world is usually transitory. Just about the time you start reading your own press clippings, the gambling Gods have a way of smacking you back to reality.
I LOVE Bama this week, and will try to post my opinion on this game either late tonight or tomorrow.
As far as Cody is concerned, it would be pretty stupid to pretend that his injury is not a huge blow to Bama's defense. Obviously it is. But I don't think it'll have quite the deleterious effect that many think it will. The reason is man-child Josh Chapman.
Many don't realize that Cody normally plays about 2/3 of the snaps, and Chapman plays the other 1/3. Many times when Chapman does make a big play, most people assume it's Cody. Announcers seem to mess this up frequently. The biggest problem will be who plays behind Chapman. It appears the guy who Chapman will share snaps with Chapman this week will be last year's starter Lorenzo Washington. And while Washington did a decent job of holding down the nose last year despite being way undersized for the position, he is not a prototypical 3-4 nose tackle. Unlike Cody and Chapman, Lo can be moved and, most importantly, he doesn't command a double-team.
As far as last week is concerned, it's a little different when you lose a guy in the middle of the game, and you have to make adjustments on the fly. Many times you have guys playing out of position, or having to play guys who got very few reps in practice. Bama should hold up pretty well this week given that the new rotation will have the benefit of a week of practice. See the difference?
![]()
FREAK OUT!!!
Thanks for the kind words Bamarod. Being on top of the capping world is usually transitory. Just about the time you start reading your own press clippings, the gambling Gods have a way of smacking you back to reality.
I LOVE Bama this week, and will try to post my opinion on this game either late tonight or tomorrow.
As far as Cody is concerned, it would be pretty stupid to pretend that his injury is not a huge blow to Bama's defense. Obviously it is. But I don't think it'll have quite the deleterious effect that many think it will. The reason is man-child Josh Chapman.
Many don't realize that Cody normally plays about 2/3 of the snaps, and Chapman plays the other 1/3. Many times when Chapman does make a big play, most people assume it's Cody. Announcers seem to mess this up frequently. The biggest problem will be who plays behind Chapman. It appears the guy who Chapman will share snaps with Chapman this week will be last year's starter Lorenzo Washington. And while Washington did a decent job of holding down the nose last year despite being way undersized for the position, he is not a prototypical 3-4 nose tackle. Unlike Cody and Chapman, Lo can be moved and, most importantly, he doesn't command a double-team.
As far as last week is concerned, it's a little different when you lose a guy in the middle of the game, and you have to make adjustments on the fly. Many times you have guys playing out of position, or having to play guys who got very few reps in practice. Bama should hold up pretty well this week given that the new rotation will have the benefit of a week of practice. See the difference?
![]()
FREAK OUT!!!

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.